The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: dutch508 on June 06, 2015, 07:36:52 PM

Title: WACO Shootout: Well, that's a weird statement.
Post by: dutch508 on June 06, 2015, 07:36:52 PM
The shootout between Bikers and other Bikers and Police have confused the DUmpmonkies.

Quote
Judi Lynn (93,889 posts) http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141111759

Witnesses: Semi-automatic gunfire dominated biker shootout

You mean they didn't use blot action rifles and flintlocks!? I am so surprised!  ::)

Quote
Duckhunter935 (7,559 posts)
3. No the part that is interesting and you seem to miss

Is this....

Police have identified only one assault weapon, a semi-automatic gun that fires high-powered ammunition, among the firearms confiscated from bikers, and that was found in a locked car after the shooting ended.

So more than likely the semi-auto fire came from the police.

uh... you don't seem to understand that there are semi-automatic pistols... it's not just 'assualt-rifles' that are semi-auto.

Quote
Lizzie Poppet (4,430 posts)
9. I'd be surprised if virtually all the weapons involved weren't semi-automatic.

Not all semi-automatic rifles, mind you...

All Bikers carry single action .45 long colt revolvers.

Quote
Comrade Grumpy (11,373 posts)
4. Will this turn out to be a police massacre?

 ::)

Quote
petronius (23,621 posts)
8. It's a confusingly-written article: they make this point of "semi-automatic," but

I wonder if the distinction they're really trying to draw is between rifles and handguns. In that case, it seems there would be cause for concern, since the police would be more likely to be the ones with rifles and the bikers the ones with the (concealable) handguns. So if it was a "few pistol shots" followed by a 'barrage of rifle fire" then it suggests that it was the police doing the firing. But it sounds like that's the part the police are calling inaccurate, and witnesses--to sounds no less--aren't that reliable.

Hopefully, they kept careful track of all the firearms, and will match them up carefully...

Quote
maindawg (833 posts)
12. It was a set up

The first shot fired was an undercover cop. Then it became a massacre by the police.
There is video.

 ::)

Title: Re: WACO Shootout: Well, that's a weird statement.
Post by: ChuckJ on June 06, 2015, 07:41:30 PM
Most cops are better folks than I am because based on what I've seen on DU if I were a cop called to assist a DUmmie I'd feel the need to stop and get some gas, do a crossword puzzle, count stars, etc before answering the call.
Title: Re: WACO Shootout: Well, that's a weird statement.
Post by: Delmar on June 06, 2015, 07:58:03 PM
Quote
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)Sat Jun 6, 2015, 06:49 PM
Star Member valerief (45,063 posts)
5. Praise the Lord they had their god-given rights to own and use a

semi-automatic gun, as has been granted by the Second Amendment to the Bible. A human life is not worth taking away this sacred right.

Right?


Right?????

Valerie F (for fool) is willing to let the democrat party decide what her rights are.
Title: Re: WACO Shootout: Well, that's a weird statement.
Post by: I_B_Perky on June 06, 2015, 08:35:20 PM
Most cops are better folks than I am because based on what I've seen on DU if I were a cop called to assist a DUmmie I'd feel the need to stop and get some gas, do a crossword puzzle, count stars, etc before answering the call.

I doubt the dummies would call the cops... they would be too afraid the cops would find their street drugs and arrest them.
Title: Re: WACO Shootout: Well, that's a weird statement.
Post by: delilahmused on June 06, 2015, 09:00:36 PM
Quote
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)Sat Jun 6, 2015, 06:49 PM
Star Member valerief (45,063 posts)
5. Praise the Lord they had their god-given rights to own and use a

semi-automatic gun, as has been granted by the Second Amendment to the Bible. A human life is not worth taking away this sacred right.

Right?


Right?????

Pretty sure I've never read "Thou shalt have weapons" in the Bible. If you're referring to the Constitution as the Bible, Val, you need to find another country. Now.

Cindie
Title: Re: WACO Shootout: Well, that's a weird statement.
Post by: SVPete on June 06, 2015, 09:11:18 PM
I suspect that if DU-folk responded honestly, without use of Google or Wikipedia, to a request to define, "semi-automatic," amusement would ensue. If not outright hilarity. And if one of them posted an accurate definition, (s)he would probably get bunches of, "That can't be right!" responses, if not a Post Report.
Title: Re: WACO Shootout: Well, that's a weird statement.
Post by: dutch508 on June 06, 2015, 11:28:02 PM
I doubt the dummies would call the cops... they would be too afraid the cops would find their street drugs and arrest them.

In my experiences the DUmpmonkies are the first to call the Police. Then they bitch about being busted for drugs, resist arrest, or otherwise make a fool out of themselves.
Title: Re: WACO Shootout: Well, that's a weird statement.
Post by: dutch508 on June 06, 2015, 11:36:31 PM
Quote
DallasNE (4,292 POSTS)
28. That Is How Kent State Got Started

An UNDERCOVER FBI agent pulled out a gun and in a struggle it discharged and then the Guard turned and started firing in the direction of the gunshot.

They should have all of the spent shell casings and that would tell them what type of weapon was used. If they had evidence that the bikers did most of the shooting that information would have been released long ago. The fact that nothing has been released points toward the police doing most of the firing, one would suspect.

Yeah... I don't think that's what happened.

Quote
1Greensix (92 POSTS)
33. Autopsy reports

I wonder what the autopsy reports will say when retrieved bullets ARE matched to POLICE weapons. Now that Texas has become an open carry state many of those shooting May have been Defending themselves against rogue, trigger happy cops. If I had been there and charged I certainly would use self-defense as my only defense. Second Amendment.

 :whistling:
Title: Re: WACO Shootout: Well, that's a weird statement.
Post by: Carl on June 07, 2015, 05:04:48 AM
Quote
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)Sat Jun 6, 2015, 06:49 PM
Star Member valerief (45,063 posts)
5. Praise the Lord they had their god-given rights to own and use a

semi-automatic gun, as has been granted by the Second Amendment to the Bible. A human life is not worth taking away this sacred right.

Right?


Right?????


Quote
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141109346
Response to Cooley Hurd (Original post)Wed Jun 3, 2015, 07:14 PM
Star Member valerief (45,065 posts)
2. You mean the world almost lost Pamela Geller?

This is why you DUmbasses disgust normal people.
Even death is moralized by the prism of your politics.
Title: Re: WACO Shootout: Well, that's a weird statement.
Post by: JohnnyReb on June 07, 2015, 08:18:24 AM
If it's black and ugly, it's an assault weapon.......sheila Jackson-lee, Maxine Waters, Moochelle Obama....all assault weapons.
Title: Re: WACO Shootout: Well, that's a weird statement.
Post by: Movie buff- The Sequel on June 07, 2015, 02:33:30 PM
I doubt the dummies would call the cops... they would be too afraid the cops would find their street drugs and arrest them.
Yep, or the massive caches of child pornography on their computers.
Title: Re: WACO Shootout: Well, that's a weird statement.
Post by: obumazombie on June 07, 2015, 02:51:31 PM
Quote
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)Sat Jun 6, 2015, 06:49 PM
Star Member valerief (45,063 posts)
5. Praise the Lord they had their god-given rights to own and use a

semi-automatic gun, as has been granted by the Second Amendment to the Bible. A human life is not worth taking away this sacred right.

Right?


Right?????

We need a handicapper to offer an over/under for the following scenario...


valerief is at the end of a line of innocent people.
A mass murderer is shooting people in the line dead one by one in order.
valerief has access to a firearm, and is able to shoot the mass murderer at any time.
With each killing, valerief becomes more and more aware that her inevitable death by shooting from the mass murderer is becoming more and more certain.
How many of her fellow innocent human beings will valerief allow to be killed before she puts a stop to the mass murderer by shooting him/her ?
Title: Re: WACO Shootout: Well, that's a weird statement.
Post by: BlueStateSaint on June 07, 2015, 04:19:05 PM
We need a handicapper to offer an over/under for the following scenario...


valerief is at the end of a line of innocent people.
A mass murderer is shooting people in the line dead one by one in order.
valerief has access to a firearm, and is able to shoot the mass murderer at any time.
With each killing, valerief becomes more and more aware that her inevitable death by shooting from the mass murderer is becoming more and more certain.
How many of her fellow innocent human beings will valerief allow to be killed before she puts a stop to the mass murderer by shooting him/her ?

All of them, to include her.
Title: Re: WACO Shootout: Well, that's a weird statement.
Post by: obumazombie on June 07, 2015, 08:09:59 PM
All of them, to include her.

You are probably right but I always expect libs to be hypocrites and liars whenever the rubber meets the road.