The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: GOBUCKS on May 24, 2015, 04:25:37 PM
-
Even after years of exposure to the crazy bald dwarf, her arrogance can be stunning, her ignorant, aggressive condescension breathtaking.
Surely the DUmp has never seen a more hilarious, offensive nut.
Fri May 22, 2015, 08:33 PM
nadinbrzezinski (137,191 posts)
Those emails are indeed a treasure trove
if you want to understand better what happened in Benghazi.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026714073#post52
Sun May 24, 2015, 10:39 AM
nadinbrzezinski (137,191 posts)
102. So we should not complain
when one breaks the law because all do. That standard really is insufficient. But if you are happy with it, who am I to say?
Sun May 24, 2015, 01:36 PM
nadinbrzezinski (137,191 posts)
110. And I am critical of politicians
I am consistent. You are not.
Thanks for playing
Fri May 22, 2015, 10:36 PM
Hekate (29,779 posts)
15. Hot damn, Nadine, this is the kind of intelligent close reading more DUers should be doing
Thanks very much for sharing what you are doing.
Fri May 22, 2015, 10:41 PM
nadinbrzezinski (137,191 posts)
17. I am mostly downloading and then will
curl up to them.
Response to joshcryer (Reply #21Sat May 23, 2015, 12:59 AM
nadinbrzezinski (137,191 posts)
23. I knew history was boring
You would know this if you took the time to go through this crap.
Response to MaggieD (Reply #42)Sat May 23, 2015, 05:15 PM
nadinbrzezinski (137,191 posts)
48. So do tell me what exactly is right wing talking point
about Senate Resolution 212? You are way out of your league. This is a treasure trove. Your comment reveals your disdain for history. Now move along.
Response to MaggieD (Reply #49)Sat May 23, 2015, 08:27 PM
nadinbrzezinski (137,191 posts)
52. Do some in the dump deal with Benghazi?
Yes.
Are you going to scream that RW talking point when this shows up in a history book?
As I said, way out of your league.
Sat May 23, 2015, 08:34 PM
MaggieD (2,492 posts)
54. Sorry - I'm appalled
That this Benghazi stuff is even permitted here.
It's sad what Skinner has let this place turn into. Just sad.
Response to MaggieD (Reply #54)Sat May 23, 2015, 08:54 PM
nadinbrzezinski (137,191 posts)
56. So it is not a valid news item that the Department of State
released over 800 individual pages
You want visa applications? A bunch of them.
As I said, you are a one trick pony. In the USSR they used to remove people from State photos and disappear records. Are you telling me you are a fan of that? Becuase you sure are making it sound like you are.
Alas that is the historian in me asking questions.
And yes, in the best I can say is that you agree with the folks in Moscow that disappeared people, destroyed records, and air brushed people out of official photos.
Response to MaggieD (Reply #72)Sat May 23, 2015, 10:06 PM
nadinbrzezinski (137,191 posts)
74. It matters little under sunshine laws this was going to come out
I know you cannot accept that, but this was going to come out.
And it saddens me, but does not surprise me, that you are unable to comprehend this.
Response to MaggieD (Reply #77)Sat May 23, 2015, 10:18 PM
nadinbrzezinski (137,191 posts)
79. Becauase it is immaterial
it was going to come out. The fact that you cannot comprehend that is not my issue, it is yours.
You are so out of your league it is not even funny
You are unable to comprehend that.
Response to MaggieD (Reply #55)Sat May 23, 2015, 08:56 PM
nadinbrzezinski (137,191 posts)
57. He has been quite open with what he puts out
and yes, he is a US Senator. I suspect he will not fight it, unless... and some of them are classified. they are.
Like any case work with the United States Department of State, but I don't expect you to know this.
And no kid, I am not putting a FOIA, I do not cover US Political races for the most part. Now I cover big money in politics
You are way out of your league. I mean WAY OUT.
Response to bigtree (Reply #63)Sat May 23, 2015, 09:47 PM
nadinbrzezinski (137,191 posts)
65. I s'pose if you were around in the 1970s
you would be ok with the missing minutes of tape from the Nixon White House
Again, you would know this if you actually cared. You don't, but this is what makes this place so damn entertaining.
Response to bigtree (Reply #67)Sat May 23, 2015, 09:59 PM
nadinbrzezinski (137,191 posts)
69. That document is in there
But you lack the interest, and that is sad.
It is a shame you can't
-
I remember when she quit crazy Andrea's place because they referred to Obama as Barry. She's a hypocrite, but hilarious and I love when she talks down to her fellow travelers.
-
Oh noes! a snark!
demtenjeep (22,342 posts)
118. how many readers do you have?
do you get monthly donations?
I am wondering how one can live in one of the most expensive cities in the USA and live off of a blog.
Please tell me more, I would love to be able to retire early
How do you do it?
and the inevitable alert:
Logical (16,532 posts)
120. LOL, someone alerted this. Wow, talk about a silly alert......
On Sun May 24, 2015, 04:42 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
how many readers do you have?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6722436
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
This person is not asking an honest question. She is mostly harassing. She has a history of doing this as well. She is not interested in answers, just plain out harassment.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun May 24, 2015, 04:50 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I'm not seeing it and I'm not getting pulled into one of those intricate DU dramas.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Wow, what a worthless alert
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I suppose this is sarcasm but I can't tell without context.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It is offensive to ask? Wow.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I see nothing wrong with the question.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No violation I can see.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
-
MaggieD (2,492 posts)
54. Sorry - I'm appalled
That this Benghazi stuff is even permitted here.
It's sad what Skinner has let this place turn into. Just sad.
Heh..... :lmao:
-
I'm trying to fathom this ... nads is catching Hades on DU for acknowledging reality? I'm not sure I can prezellate my brain enough to wrap it around that. Beyond that, nads and her DU un-fans richly deserve each other, and I hope they grate on each other for years to come.
-
I'm trying to fathom this ... nads is catching Hades on DU for acknowledging reality? I'm not sure I can prezellate my brain enough to wrap it around that. Beyond that, nads and her DU un-fans richly deserve each other, and I hope they grate on each other for years to come.
You're not the only one. H5 given.
-
You're not the only one.
The funny aspect of nads and other non-fans of The Chill bringing up Benghazi is that it's a near certainty, IMO - that some or all of them in 2012-2014 were denying that Benghazi was of any great significance beyond several people being dead (assuming they acknowledged even that much significance ... I wonder how many DU-folk rejoiced at the deaths of those security people!).
-
When it comes to talking down, cousin nadin steps up.
-
I'm trying to fathom this ... nads is catching Hades on DU for acknowledging reality? I'm not sure I can prezellate my brain enough to wrap it around that. Beyond that, nads and her DU un-fans richly deserve each other, and I hope they grate on each other for years to come.
Yep. Among my own list of 'When Hell freezes over' items I've ever pondered, Nadin actually being sort of right about something was right up there.
-
Standby
Nadin Brzezinski
7 hrs ·
Well that was a nice return to that short story. For the first time I am not doing any pre writing, Doing this from the seat of my pants.
-
Standby
:runaway: :runaway: :runaway:
:panic: :panic: :panic:
:bolt: :bolt: :bolt:
-
Doing this from the seat of my pants.
:bolt: That's a (very) mental image I could have forgone for another century or two! :bolt:
-
Oh my word, cousin gNads raises condesendance to a condesening level which is unreachable by the hildabeasts. Nothing can stop teh grate omni-impotent crazy bald dwarf now.
It's a shame it doesn't have the goNads to sign up here and school us lowly Cavers.