The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: GOBUCKS on May 20, 2015, 07:08:33 PM
-
Wed May 20, 2015, 02:38 PM
nadinbrzezinski (137,047 posts)
Well in developing news....re Jim Webb
I think Jim Webb will make it official and throw his hat in the ring.
Here, Email that just came to my box...for those of us following the games and not endorsing anybody, the more the merrier.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026701678
Wed May 20, 2015, 02:45 PM
nadinbrzezinski (137,047 posts)
2. Hey, the only one that will get my endorsement in this is big money
that is the big winner here.
Yes, I am that cynical anymore.
Wed May 20, 2015, 03:06 PM
nadinbrzezinski (137,047 posts)
But when all is said and done, those of us who will endorse money in the end... the big winner in this race
(My level of cynicism really has gone to the roof)
Wed May 20, 2015, 03:19 PM
nadinbrzezinski (137,047 posts)
7. I have had a few conversations with former staffers...
Ah the sausage making and how it really works...
Wed May 20, 2015, 03:42 PM
nadinbrzezinski (137,047 posts)
11. I am talking nuts and bolts here
not what pols stand for.
Wed May 20, 2015, 03:59 PM
nadinbrzezinski (137,047 posts)
14. Well I run a non partisan media outlet
I do not work to elect pols. I do not endorse pols I just watch.
Though on a comedic side, I think I will be endorsing big money. It really does not matter who wins, big money is the big winner here.
Wed May 20, 2015, 05:35 PM
nadinbrzezinski (137,047 posts)
18. Look I am only endorsing big money
the obvious winner of this farse...
I just report in this case.
Oh, no!! It's a "farse"!
This just in - nutcase nadin is endorsing big money.
-
gNads says, "I farse in your general direction!"
-
Response to sabrina 1 (Reply #15)Wed May 20, 2015, 06:39 PM
nadinbrzezinski (137,055 posts)
26. You misunderstand
we endorsing big money is part of our coverage of big money and it's role in politics. We no longer cover the race perse, but we cover the effects of big money in politics. Last cycle we interviewed a local expert. This year I think I will endorse big money as the obvious winner and distorter of whatever passes for democracy any more.
You see when my local congressman and his competitor spent, with the PACs, 17 million for a seat in Congress,... well what can I say? Money is the big winner there.
I expect my local congressman and his challenger to outdo each other this year, and spend at least 20, perhaps double it. that be 34 million. Have you checked how much a US Congressman gets paid a year?
That be 34 million? I thought that be retardant.
Can you tell I'm cynical? What if I say that I'm cynical again? Can you tell it now?
You think you know stuff, but you really don't. You think at election time every just climbs out the grave and pulls the "D" lever, but there's more to it than that. There's sausage and stuff involved. I know about it. You don't.
-----------
By the way, I thought her blog was a "newspaper", but now it seems to be a non partisan media outlet. When did that happen?
-
I expect my local congressman and his challenger to outdo each other this year, and spend at least 20, perhaps double it. that be 34 million. Have you checked how much a US Congressman gets paid a year?
2X20=34
liberal math!
-
2X20=34
liberal math!
my local congressman and his competitor spent, with the PACs, 17 million for a seat in Congress
That be last election. 34 million be double that, and be retardant, and also be big money which nadin endorses.
-
Crazy insufferable scrunt.
Imagine any campaign getting a call for an interview from its broken and mumbling Ruskie dialect.
The laughter will be epic.
-
I am beginning to wonder if cousin nadin has been spending time with the Boston Drunkard.
edit+n
-
I am beginning to wonder if cousin nadin has bee spending time with the Boston Drunkard.
Yes, and here is proof:
Wed May 20, 2015, 03:19 PM
nadinbrzezinski (137,047 posts)
7. I have had a few conversations with former staffers...
Ah the sausage making and how it really works...
-
Yes, and here is proof:
Thanks for the opportunity to edit my post.
I wrote "bee", and it should have been "been"
-
Pam is trying to stir the pot but nadin is iggy'ing her. I think Pam is jealous of the nads DOTY wins.
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Original post)
Wed May 20, 2015, 09:44 PM
demtenjeep (22,332 posts)
30. I actually think that the D should rally behind one overwhelming candidate from the start
let the idiots in the republican clown short bus take each other out while our candidate gets stronger and doesn't have to spend "BIG MONEY" battling.
wouldn't endorsing "big money" be a farce in itself?
-
2X20=34
liberal math!
As you probably recall, 60cm=1m
Simple gNads math.
-
As you probably recall, 60cm=1m
Simple gNads math.
You're getting good at that.
Don't get too close to the fire.
You will singe your eyebrows.
-
You're getting good at that.
Don't get too close to the fire.
You will singe your eyebrows.
Or as Nadin might say & type, "sing" your eyebrows.
-
^Heh.
-
Or as Nadin might say & type, "sing" your eyebrows.
:lmao:
Imagine her saying that. It would sound like Donald Duck dubbed to Yiddish, "zink yoor eyebrowss".
-
:lmao:
Imagine her saying that. It would sound like Donald Duck dubbed to Yiddish, "zink yoor eyebrowss".
You should do a bit like that on your Radio show.
-
You should do a bit like that on your Radio show.
I'm sure I can come up with something!
I am writing a bit- a 30 second commercial that starts with Hillary Clinton's voice in a campaign ad, then has 25 seconds of side effects, like a pharmaceutical commercial.