The Conservative Cave
Current Events => Politics => Topic started by: txradioguy on April 24, 2015, 08:23:12 AM
-
On Thursday, the New York Times verified and confirmed facts presented in the forthcoming book Clinton Cash which reveals that in October 2010, then-Sec. of State Hillary Rodham Clinton approved the Russian government’s takeover of a company named Uranium One—a decision that gave away half of U.S. uranium output to the Russian government, resulted in the deal’s investors giving the Clinton Foundation $145 million, and occurred while Bill Clinton made hundreds of thousands of dollars in speaking fees paid for by Kremlin-connected businesses.
Breitbart News has also learned the names of several additional Clinton Foundation donors who were the beneficiaries of Hillary Clinton’s State Department policies beyond those revealed by other sources that have reported on Clinton Cash.
Included in the Clinton Foundation donations were $2.35 million in hidden contributions from Canadian executive Ian Telfer that the Clintons never disclosed—a striking and direct violation of the Clintons’ agreement with the Obama administration that all foreign Clinton foundation donations would be publicly disclosed.
Clinton Cash, which contains 57 pages of endnotes totaling over 600 primary sources and contains no off-the-record interviews, establishes the first reported instance of an undisclosed donation by a foreign individual with business before Hillary Clinton during her tenure as Sec. of State.
Alarmingly, until February 2015, Ian Telfer was the chairman of the Russian-controlled Uranium One—the company Hillary Clinton approved as Sec. of State for the Russian takeover of half of U.S. uranium output.
Most shockingly of all: According to the New York Times, despite assurances to the contrary, the transfer of U.S. uranium to Russian control lacked safeguards to prevent uranium dug out of U.S. soil from being exported.
In a 4,000-word, front-page New York Times exposé, Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative reporter Jo Becker and Mike McIntire reported on and confirmed the accuracy of the uranium revelations, one of many featured in the new bombshell book, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Made Bill and Hillary Rich by three-time New York Times bestselling author, Breitbart News Senior Editor-at-Large, and Government Accountability Institute (GAI) President Peter Schweizer.
According to the Times and Schweizer’s book, former President Bill Clinton and Clinton Foundation mega donor and Canadian mining executive Frank Giustra flew to Kazakhstan in September 2005 and met with Kazakh dictator Nursultan Nazarbeyev. Giustra wanted lucrative uranium mining concessions, and within 48 hours of Clinton and Giustra’s trip, Giustra’s company, then-named UrAsia Energy, signed memos of understanding outlining the transfer of uranium mining assets.
Months after the trip, Giustra transferred $31.1 million to the Clinton Foundation and announced a multi-year commitment to donate $100 million to the Clinton’s family foundation, as well as half of his future profits.
“All of my chips, almost, are on Bill Clinton,†said Giustra. “He can do things and ask for things no one else can.â€
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/04/23/clinton-cash-more-names-revealed-of-foundation-donors-who-benefited-from-hillarys-state-department/
-
At what point does this regime face criminal charges?
-
Not everyone involved in the Hitlery corruption has the criminal chops Hitlery does.
She is able to stand fast under the most intense law enforcement pressure.
But so many names are coming up that at least one of them will crack under the pressure.
-
Not everyone involved in the Hitlery corruption has the criminal chops Hitlery does.
She is able to stand fast under the most intense law enforcement pressure.
But so many names are coming up that at least one of them will crack under the pressure.
They may "crack" under pressure; but perhaps it would become their word against hers.
-
What I find the most alarming is the Clinton's ownership of a uranium business and their sale of uranium to Putin who in turn would very likely (if he hasn't already) in turn sell to Iran. What I find even more alarming is the "nuke deal" that Obama and Kerry have offered Iran. I now can't help but question the real reason for the "deal" and would kind of financial kick back are they getting? I wonder also their involvement with the Clinton Foundation?
This is also on the heels of the new attorney general being approved.
Not looking good at all for our country at all...we've been sold out.
-
What I find the most alarming is the Clinton's ownership of a uranium business and their sale of uranium to Putin who in turn would very likely (if he hasn't already) in turn sell to Iran. What I find even more alarming is the "nuke deal" that Obama and Kerry have offered Iran. I now can't help but question the real reason for the "deal" and would kind of financial kick back are they getting? I wonder also their involvement with the Clinton Foundation?
This is also on the heels of the new attorney general being approved.
Not looking good at all for our country at all...we've been sold out.
As long as the Clintons profit, what difference at this point does it make ?
All the more reason it's so hazardous for Hitlery to win the presidency.
There is no limit to the amount of influence she and Bill could sell.
-
Watched the Fox News interview of Schwiezer. Simply amazing. Extremely troubling. 30,000 of her e-mails have been deleted. The Clinton's own the uranium company. How can people (including liberals) not connect the dots now? Even more troubling are the "nuke talks" with Iran right now with Kerry and Obama. The very last thing we as a country need is to allow Iran nuclear capabilities and then Hillary take office. See the writing on the wall anyone? It is fairly obvious.
-
They may "crack" under pressure; but perhaps it would become their word against hers.
Rumor has it that Vince Foster "cracked under pressure".
CMD
-
Watched the Fox News interview of Schwiezer. Simply amazing. Extremely troubling. 30,000 of her e-mails have been deleted. The Clinton's own the uranium company. How can people (including liberals) not connect the dots now? Even more troubling are the "nuke talks" with Iran right now with Kerry and Obama. The very last thing we as a country need is to allow Iran nuclear capabilities and then Hillary take office. See the writing on the wall anyone? It is fairly obvious.
I haven't seen any references to the Clintons owning the uranium company.
Notice that Clintons is plural.
That would mean both of them, or it could even mean both and Chelsea.
But it would certainly mean more than one Clinton.
And if I add an apostrophe, I make Clinton's a whole new meaning.
The apostrophe makes Clintons possessive.
As in something belonging to one or more Clintons.
Back to the reference.
Do you have one for your claim that the Clintons (no apostrophe) own the uranium company ?