The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: dutch508 on April 24, 2015, 07:11:37 AM
-
Uh-oh.... trouble brewing in DUmplandistan!
mgcgulfcoast (945 posts) http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251404694
Should Hillary step aside?
To be brutally honest she isnt the most ethical and forthright candidate. We need someone younger and someone that isnt a walkin ethical nightmare.
Cant Elizabeth Warren be persuaded to run?
:fuelfire:
But no worries... the cliton brownshirts jump in to beat down disorder...
babylonsister (149,347 posts)
1. HAHAHAHAHAHA!
Ask your friends, and let us know!
hrmjustin (55,046 posts)
6. No one is forcing anything on you.
hrmjustin (55,046 posts)
4. You do get that Warren is only two years younger?
wait for it..
mgcgulfcoast (945 posts)
7. but far more ethical.
:fuelfire:
SKIPPY TO THE RESCUE!!!
NYC_SKP (66,762 posts)
8. 8. "Hillary and her campaign are a large balloon floating around in search of a pin."
Here are four reasons Warren will run, a total of 20 reasons in the full article:
The Democratic race: Why Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) will run in 2016 against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
1. Warren is the only national politician today from either party who conveys a sense of outrage over our current — deteriorating — national situation. Her passion is her signature calling card in a time when all the other candidates for president seem to have passion only for themselves and their candidacies.
2. At a recent 12-person in-depth focus group in Denver conducted by Peter Hart and reported in The Washington Post by Dan Balz, the only national politician who was viewed favorably was Warren — even by some of the Republican voters in the focus group.
3. Why? Because she is the only politician who is even talking about the powerlessness of the average person — and the seemingly too powerful corporate and Wall Street entities.
4. This issue cuts across all political lines. It is the issue that catapulted President Teddy Roosevelt into the political hall of fame. His trust busting led to today's anti-trust regulations and the belief that the federal government's role is to act as a neutral referee to ensure a fair playing field. But no one today believes the feds are neutral — or fair. Instead, big government is seen as corrupt and as "rigged" as big business.
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/231599-why-warren-will-run-against-clinton-in-2016
still_one (35,646 posts)
13. Really? The article is from 3 months ago, and Senator Warren has repeatedly said she would not run in 2016.
If it turns out that she does NOT run do you think the Hill will come out and say, hmmm, I guess we got that one wrong, or rather they will kinda brush under the rug like 90% of the blowhard stock analysts on the financial networks do when their predictions are wrong, which they usually are
RBInMaine (11,055 posts)
24. Warren is NOT running. Please stop this insanity. It is delusional nuttery.
You almost gotta wonder what the Clintons have on Warren to make her not run...
still_one (35,646 posts)
10. What a dumb post. If you are so pumped for Elizabeth Warren then join Move-on.org who wants to start a draft Warren movement
As for your first point why would any candidate who is polling well step aside. As far as your assumption that she is unethical and not forthright then you obviously have your own bias, and most likely this post is just typical flame bait
okaawhatever (6,917 posts)
15. This smells of push polling. Clinton isn't an ethical nightmare, and I think you know that. Any viable candidate will be torn apart by the GOP and their media machine. What's funny is that despite all the investigations (for 8 yrs when Bill was President) and every document examined, there wasn't ONE unethical thing they could find that Hillary had done.
If you actually believe the tripe that is coming from the discredited reporter/Koch hack who wrote Clinton Cash you need to ask yourself why.
world wide wally (2,336 posts)
20. I think someone is drinking too much Republican Kool Aid
RBInMaine (11,055 posts)
23. Warren is NOT running. Enough of this nonsense, please. It's getting OLD.
-
I for one hope that Hillary's overly inflated ego doens't allow her to step aside and she gets the nomination.
It greatly increases the chances of a Republican being sworn in if she decides to see this through.
-
I for one hope that Hillary's overly inflated ego doens't allow her to step aside and she gets the nomination.
It greatly increases the chances of a Republican being sworn in if she decides to see this through.
Run, Hillary, run!
(http://sharethe.buzz/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Tom-Hanks-Forrest-Gump-jpg.jpg)
-
I still laugh at how serious these dung heads take any polling now.
A month can be a lifetime in politics much less 18.
-
mgcgulfcoast (945 posts) http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251404694
Should Hillary step aside?
To be brutally honest she isnt the most ethical and forthright candidate. We need someone younger and someone that isnt a walkin ethical nightmare.
Cant Elizabeth Warren be persuaded to run?
Hillary is only 2 years older than Runs-with-unions.
-
We need someone younger and someone that isnt a walkin ethical nightmare.
Cant Elizabeth Warren be persuaded to run?
Might want to rethink the words Elizabeth Warren and "ethical"
Warren appears from outward appearance to be more European than American Indian. However, from 1986 through 1995, she claimed to be American Indian in order to obtain minority status as a Harvard law professor. During that ten year period, the professional law school directory had Warren listed as an American Indian.
http://godfatherpolitics.com/5029/unethical-use-of-minority-status-makes-elizabeth-warren-typical-democrat-candidate/#zX7FFzFtwPf1XO6O.99
Warren represented not just Travelers, but numerous other companies starting in the late 1990s working out of and using her Harvard Law School office in Cambridge, which she listed as her office of record on briefs filed with various courts. Warren, however, never has been licensed to practice law in Massachusetts.
<snip>
Warren refused to disclose the full extent of her private law practice when asked by The Boston Globe. If Warren denies that she has practiced law in Massachusetts without a license, Warren should disclose the full extent of her private law practice. The public has a right to assess whether Warren has failed to comply with the most basic requirement imposed on others, the need to become a member of the Bar of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in order to practice law in and from Massachusetts.
http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09/elizabeth-warrens-law-license-problem/
Judicial Watch uncovered evidence that Elizabeth Warren gave false statements under oath regarding Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) activities when she served as the agency’s interim director. According to the records, Warren and the CFPB were intimately involved in brokering a 50-state settlement underway with the nation’s largest mortgage lenders related to alleged improper foreclosure procedures. This evidence seems to contradict Warren’s statements before Congress suggesting her office responded to requests for advice, but did not seek to push its views.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-announces-list-of-washingtons-ten-most-wanted-corrupt-politicians-for-2012/
-
JustAnotherGen (15,499 posts)
28. Hell to the no!
She's got the Republicans drawers in a twist.
And that's all you traitorous ****s care about. The fact that Russia now has a large supply of Uranium, American uranium, all for a few million dollars given to her shady as hell organization, means nothing. Just that other Americans, Republicans, don't like her. You ****ing assholes are the reason a revolution is right around the corner. You might want to start going to the range to prolong your life. You're HEAVILY outmatched and outgunned currently.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0
-
Should Hillary step aside?
Heck no! Our country needs an Elderly-American in this race to speak up for the rights of all old people.
The man child Barry hasn't uttered the words Liver Spots while in office. Silence = Death!
We don't need an effort to address the challenge of childhood obesity. What we need is an advocate for foods that won't pop your dentures loose.
(http://i1095.photobucket.com/albums/i475/Delmar59/6a00d83451d48a69e200e54fbd33f58834-800wi_zpst8ih0byn.jpg) (http://s1095.photobucket.com/user/Delmar59/media/6a00d83451d48a69e200e54fbd33f58834-800wi_zpst8ih0byn.jpg.html)
-
Hillary is only 2 years older than Runs-with-unions.
But that's in human years. Does the 2 years still hold for their species?
-
I for one hope that Hillary's overly inflated ego doens't allow her to step aside and she gets the nomination.
It greatly increases the chances of a Republican being sworn in if she decides to see this through.
Indeed. And many Dems instinctively know it.
The problem for them is Hillary Clinton is a Clinton. They don't back down when their money and reputations are on the line. If they don't knock her out of contention in the next couple of weeks, she will be their nominee.
Obama won in part because he was an unknown. -And a charismatic unknown can be everything to everyone. The Dems need that in the equation again, or they need the Republican to also be a known quantity.
-Which is why they have gone full-on Brer Rabbit with Jeb Bush.
*Oh NOES !!!! The only wascilly wepublican that can beet Hillary is Jeb Bush !!11! I weely hope they dont nominate him !!111!!!
Yeah, right.. :whatever: - The only reason they want Jeb as the nom is so it can be 2nd Clinton vs 3rd Bush - which gives Hillary a fighting chance. Everybody else on the Republican slate so far is a threat to another Clinton victory, except maybe Chris Christie. And that's only because he cant help but to walk into his own rhetorical land mines.
Well, and Trump.. But.. yeah. -- that ain't happening.
-
But that's in human years. Does the 2 years still hold for their species?
They're both dogs, so, seven is the magic number.
-
our current — deteriorating — national situation.
:bouncingidiot: :bouncingidiot: :bouncingidiot: :bouncingidiot: :bouncingidiot: :bouncingidiot:
What? Is there a problem, Skippy?
-
And that's all you traitorous ****s care about. The fact that Russia now has a large supply of Uranium, American uranium, all for a few million dollars given to her shady as hell organization, means nothing. Just that other Americans, Republicans, don't like her. You ****ing assholes are the reason a revolution is right around the corner. You might want to start going to the range to prolong your life. You're HEAVILY outmatched and outgunned currently.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0
Hitlery sold uranium to Iran.
Excellent link to NYT.
I started a thread about it in the terrorism board.
-
However, from 1986 through 1995, she claimed to be American Indian in order to obtain minority status as a Harvard law professor. During that ten year period, the professional law school directory had Warren listed as an American Indian.
We're told perverts can "self-identify" as women and then hang out in women's locker rooms.
So why can't a crooked democrat self-identify as an Indian, in order to use the democrat reverse discrimination laws?