The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Gina on April 10, 2015, 12:59:47 PM

Title: Abortion Should Have ZERO Restrictions. ‘Period.’
Post by: Gina on April 10, 2015, 12:59:47 PM

Quote

I support letting women and their doctors make this decision without government getting involved. Period. End of story.

Under Wasserman Schultz’s direction, the 2012 Democratic National Convention drafted a party platform that supported the right to an abortion without any qualifications, and opposed “any and all efforts to weaken or undermine that right.”

http://dailycaller.com/2015/04/08/dnc-head-abortion-should-have-zero-restrictions-period/

Do all Dems/Libs support this from the head of the DNC?

Title: Re: Abortion Should Have ZERO Restrictions. ‘Period.’
Post by: SVPete on April 10, 2015, 01:13:20 PM

No government involvement? Really?

So if some nutcase-who-should-be-in-an-asylum murders DW-S and says it was a post-partum abortion? No government involvement? If I weren't a kind and compassionate guy I'd wish that on one of her family members, just to help her learn to think about who the "surplus population" is! What an bovine anus!

Title: Re: Abortion Should Have ZERO Restrictions. ‘Period.’
Post by: docstew on April 10, 2015, 01:22:03 PM

Quote from: SVPete on April 10, 2015, 01:13:20 PM

No government involvement? Really?

So if some nutcase-who-should-be-in-an-asylum murders DW-S and says it was a post-partum abortion? No government involvement? If I weren't a kind and compassionate guy I'd wish that on one of her family members, just to help her learn to think about who the "surplus population" is! What an bovine anus!

I was thinking more like some nutjob opens an abortion clinic without a license. THAT would be no government involvement.

Title: Re: Abortion Should Have ZERO Restrictions. ‘Period.’
Post by: wasp69 on April 10, 2015, 01:25:29 PM

Quote from: Gina on April 10, 2015, 12:59:47 PM

Under Wasserman Schultz’s direction, the 2012 Democratic National Convention drafted a party platform that supported the right to an abortion without any qualifications, and opposed “any and all efforts to weaken or undermine that right.”

http://dailycaller.com/2015/04/08/dnc-head-abortion-should-have-zero-restrictions-period/

Do all Dems/Libs support this from the head of the DNC?

Planned Parenthood does:

Quote

Video: Planned Parenthood Official Argues for Right to Post-Birth Abortion

Alisa LaPolt Snow, the lobbyist representing the Florida Alliance of Planned Parenthood Affiliates, testified that her organization believes the decision to kill an infant who survives a failed abortion should be left up to the woman seeking an abortion and her abortion doctor.

"If a baby is born on a table as a result of a botched abortion, what would Planned Parenthood want to have happen to that child that is struggling for life?”

"We believe that any decision that's made should be left up to the woman, her family, and the physician," said Planned Parenthood lobbyist Snow.

"What happens in a situation where a baby is alive, breathing on a table, moving. What do your physicians do at that point?”

"I do not have that information," Snow replied. "I am not a physician, I am not an abortion provider. So I do not have that information.”

"You stated that a baby born alive on a table as a result of a botched abortion that that decision should be left to the doctor and the family. Is that what you’re saying?”

Again, Snow replied, “That decision should be between the patient and the health care provider.”

“I think that at that point the patient would be the child struggling on the table, wouldn’t you agree?” asked Oliva.

"That’s a very good question. I really don’t know how to answer that," Snow said. "I would be glad to have some more conversations with you about this.”

“What objection could you possibly have to obligate a doctor to transport a child born alive to a hospital where it seems to me they would be most likely to be able to survive?”

Snow said Planned Parenthood was concerned about "those situations where it is in a rural health care setting, the hospital is 45 minutes or an hour away, that’s the closest trauma center or emergency room. You know there’s just some logistical issues involved that we have some concerns about.”

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/video-planned-parenthood-official-argues-right-post-birth-abortion_712198.html

Title: Re: Abortion Should Have ZERO Restrictions. ‘Period.’
Post by: Carl on April 10, 2015, 01:44:35 PM

To feel that the essence of what makes a womans life meaningful is the ability to ruthlessly butcher her unborn baby is as depraved and evil as anything can be.

Title: Re: Abortion Should Have ZERO Restrictions. ‘Period.’
Post by: 67 Rover on April 10, 2015, 01:45:24 PM

So much for "safe, legal, and rare"  ::)

Title: Re: Abortion Should Have ZERO Restrictions. ‘Period.’
Post by: Gina on April 10, 2015, 01:54:00 PM

So are we taking what Debbie said in the wrong way? 

Title: Re: Abortion Should Have ZERO Restrictions. ‘Period.’
Post by: jukin on April 10, 2015, 02:42:26 PM

The current crop of leftists, like all of history's leftists, are evil. Not misguided. Not mistaken. Not ill informed. They are just straight out evil.

E-V-I-L

Title: Re: Abortion Should Have ZERO Restrictions. ‘Period.’
Post by: JohnnyReb on April 10, 2015, 02:48:31 PM

Oh I know, we call cops doctors and claim they're just doing late term abortions their mothers wouldn't do.....solve a lot of problems.

Title: Re: Abortion Should Have ZERO Restrictions.
Post by: SVPete on April 10, 2015, 04:02:10 PM

Quote from: docstew on April 10, 2015, 01:22:03 PM

I was thinking more like some nutjob opens an abortion clinic without a license. THAT would be no government involvement.

License = government involvement.

Health regs (keeping sanitary) = government involvement.

Safety regs = government involvement.

Abortion is an amazing thing, come to think of it. It transforms big-nanny-government people into selective ultra-libertarian near-anarchists!

Or maybe it's just another Lib/Prog spouting ill thought out pseudo-principles.

Title: Re: Abortion Should Have ZERO Restrictions. ‘Period.’
Post by: landofconfusion80 on April 10, 2015, 04:25:42 PM

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DGRt_LUxm4[/youtube]

So she's good with it then.

Title: Re: Abortion Should Have ZERO Restrictions. ‘Period.’
Post by: GOBUCKS on April 10, 2015, 05:56:55 PM

Unrestricted abortion might legalize the 203rd trimester abortion that resulted in the death of Killer Tiller.

Title: Re: Abortion Should Have ZERO Restrictions. ‘Period.’
Post by: JohnnyReb on April 10, 2015, 07:02:06 PM

Your Honor
I did not kill him
I did not murder him
I simply aborted him

Title: Re: Abortion Should Have ZERO Restrictions. ‘Period.’
Post by: redwhit on April 10, 2015, 08:12:48 PM

Poor Debby just isn't all that bright and this is another shining example.  Basically all the republican candidates and wanna-bes have stated their position - 20 weeks is the cutoff date.  DWS and Hillary are far beyond what the vast majority of Americans believe but, for the first time, have been put on the spot. 

Now we'll get to watch the media studiously ignore this fact up to and including abortion not being a hot-button issue this time around. 

Title: Re: Abortion Should Have ZERO Restrictions. ‘Period.’
Post by: FlaGator on April 10, 2015, 08:22:43 PM

I believe in the death penalty for all felonies. No restrictions, period.