Post by: dutch508 on April 05, 2015, 03:34:34 AM
Quote
babylonsister (149,242 posts) http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026460886
Statistics Show The End is Near For Rush Limbaugh
I know, who cares? But I think this is delicious, finally!
::) this? Again?
Sideshow antics aside, the real reason the Rush Limbaugh Show is doomed is simple: businesses don't want to risk alienating customers who will be using their brands for the next 50 years to appease an aging Limbaugh demographic that likely will be dead in the next ten years or so.
So... no real stats... jusy hopes from the wish factory that is the leftist cause? :rotf:
Code: [Select]
FoxNewsSucks (348 posts)
2. [b]Actual commercial advertising is just a way for the Kochs, rightwing organizations, Heritage-type foundations, and PNAC types to get someone else to pay for what they want.[/b] The worst thing for them would be to have to underwrite his show and the rest of the rightwing hate shows themselves.
Thing is, they will. As long as Limpbough and the rest of Hate Radio does their bidding. [u]What has disappeared is liberal talk radio.[/u] [glow=red,2,300]There's no equivalent financial support to underwrite liberal shows. [/glow]
We'll never be rid of the rightwing hatemongers. :rotf:
Quote
project_bluebook (237 posts)
6. He doesn't care
He would just claim the gays ran him out of business and sucker dumbass republicans to donate millions to his cause, kind of like that bigoted pizza shop in Indiana.
The BIG LIE is still in play.
Quote
Populist_Prole (4,422 posts)
9. He's still on? You'd never know it; the "buzz" he once generated being completely gone.
:lol:
Quote
panader0 (11,964 posts)
17. My GF works as station manager for three stations in our town (approx 50,000) Rush has been a fixture for years. I hated it, but the station is basically controlled by the advertisers (they place ads in shows they pick), and she nor I had any say.
Imagine my joy when she told me that Rush and Hannity are finally being dropped (to be replaced by a Classic Country station).
This group of stations (Cherry Creek Radio, a privately owned group) has about 45 stations in small towns in the West.
Goodbye Rush.... At last.
A radio bouncy? Have we ever had one of those before?
Post by: ExGeeEye on April 05, 2015, 04:28:48 AM
What, again?
Poor guy...
I'll take some of that doom for him...I take cash, checks, paypal...
Post by: txradioguy on April 05, 2015, 05:09:32 AM
Post by: obumazombie on April 05, 2015, 10:43:26 AM
Quote
From Dutch...
A radio bouncy? Have we ever had one of those before?
We're going to need radio cops, and radio bushes.
Post by: SVPete on April 05, 2015, 11:38:57 AM
What I don't understand is how, after nearly 3 decades of proclaiming Rush's imminent doom, these whackjobs still get an audience among libs and Progs.
Post by: jukin on April 05, 2015, 11:39:40 AM
Post by: SarasotaRepub on April 05, 2015, 11:50:19 AM
Post by: thundley4 on April 05, 2015, 12:40:26 PM
Quote
panader0 (11,964 posts)
17. My GF works as station manager for three stations in our town (approx 50,000) Rush has been a fixture for years. I hated it, but the station is basically controlled by the advertisers (they place ads in shows they pick), and she nor I had any say.
Why the **** should you have any say in what the station does? You aren't an employee.
Are you implying that you control what your girlfriend thinks and does, even at her job? What kind of controlling anti-equal rights creep are you?
Post by: txradioguy on April 05, 2015, 12:47:53 PM
Why the **** should you have any say in what the station does? You aren't an employee.The DUmmies girlfriend is on the lowest rung of management at a radio station or broadcast group group...the program director. I know cause I've been one. And if she is the PD for the local talker she's really not doing much these days. Local sports in the evenings and the morning show is about all she has control of. And even if she didn't like Rush...her Operations Manager...the General Manager and the Sales Manager...not to mention the audience would all tell her to pound sand.
Are you implying that you control what your girlfriend thinks and does, even at her job? What kind of controlling anti-equal rights creep are you?
Post by: BuzzClik on April 05, 2015, 12:49:23 PM
The degree of success of larger-than-life personalities like Limbaugh, O'Reilly, and Coulter is directly proportional to how much they annoy the left, but the left never gets that. They are under the mistaken impression that extreme outrage will kill these pundits, but that outrage only makes them more attractive to their base -- drug addictions, lies, respectively, and voter fraud notwithstanding.
(EDIT: the word "respectively" was added to make it clear who I was accusing of being a drug addict, liar, and fraud.)
Post by: thundley4 on April 05, 2015, 01:04:38 PM
Limbaugh has proven to be more teflon/bulletproof than Bill Clinton. O'Reilly the same.
The degree of success of larger-than-life personalities like Limbaugh, O'Reilly, and Coulter is directly proportional to how much they annoy the left, but the left never gets that. They are under the mistaken impression that extreme outrage will kill these pundits, but that outrage only makes them more attractive to their base -- drug addictions, lies, and voter fraud notwithstanding.
Voter fraud has been proven and convictions been handed out to several democrats. Lies? Yeah, Obama has told more than his share and conservative commentators call him on them. The left hates that. Drugs? Yep, Obama has that covered too.
Post by: txradioguy on April 05, 2015, 01:08:54 PM
Limbaugh has proven to be more teflon/bulletproof than Bill Clinton. O'Reilly the same.What lies has Limbaugh told specifically?
The degree of success of larger-than-life personalities like Limbaugh, O'Reilly, and Coulter is directly proportional to how much they annoy the left, but the left never gets that. They are under the mistaken impression that extreme outrage will kill these pundits, but that outrage only makes them more attractive to their base -- drug addictions, lies, and voter fraud notwithstanding.
Post by: BuzzClik on April 05, 2015, 01:11:55 PM
I just said that criticizing Limbaugh energizes you guys, and look at you getting all huffy!
QED
Post by: txradioguy on April 05, 2015, 01:14:17 PM
LOL! Please.Yes please LOL.
I just said that criticizing Limbaugh energizes you guys, and look at you getting all huffy!
QED
I'm not huffy...I just asked a simple question.
You threw that in at the end of what I quoted.
So tell me...what lies has Limbaugh told?
Either defend the statement or retract it.
Post by: freedumb2003b on April 05, 2015, 01:14:47 PM
Limbaugh has proven to be more teflon/bulletproof than Bill Clinton. O'Reilly the same.
The degree of success of larger-than-life personalities like Limbaugh, O'Reilly, and Coulter is directly proportional to how much they annoy the left, but the left never gets that. They are under the mistaken impression that extreme outrage will kill these pundits, but that outrage only makes them more attractive to their base -- drug addictions, lies, and voter fraud notwithstanding.
Proof of that outrage and its power can be seen in the nearly million dollars donated to the Memories Pizzaria.
And since dropping Rush, Carbonite has had struggled just to keep even.
Post by: BuzzClik on April 05, 2015, 01:29:00 PM
What lies has Limbaugh told specifically?Asking that question is about as dangerous as asking, "Did Al Gore say anything inaccurate in An Inconvenient Truth?"
http://www.politifact.com/personalities/rush-limbaugh/
Enjoy! It's just the beginning, but I won't go further.
Post by: Delmar on April 05, 2015, 01:33:27 PM
Quote
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 10:00 PM
Star Member babylonsister (149,242 posts)
Statistics Show The End is Near For Rush Limbaugh
Dingy Harry thought that he had el Rushbo on the ropes too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phony_soldiers_controversy
Rush is still riding high behind the golden EIB microphone.
(http://i1095.photobucket.com/albums/i475/Delmar59/1.png_zpsieche1de.jpeg) (http://s1095.photobucket.com/user/Delmar59/media/1.png_zpsieche1de.jpeg.html)
And how's Dingy Harry doing these days?
(http://i1095.photobucket.com/albums/i475/Delmar59/1420853786275.cached_zpsqjkg3xvn.jpg) (http://s1095.photobucket.com/user/Delmar59/media/1420853786275.cached_zpsqjkg3xvn.jpg.html)
Post by: thundley4 on April 05, 2015, 01:37:21 PM
Asking that question is about as dangerous as asking, "Did Al Gore say anything inaccurate in An Inconvenient Truth?"
http://news.heartland.org/newspaper-article/2000/01/01/gores-global-warming-mentor-his-own-words
This guy was one of Al "Global Warming Is Real" Gore's professors. I think Gore skipped class, a lot.
Quote
Revelle: I estimate that the total increase [in CO2] over the past hundred years has been about 21 percent. But whether the increase will lead to a significant rise in global temperature, we can't absolutely say.
Omni: [If it happens], what will the warming of the Earth mean to us?
Revelle: There may be lots of effects. Increased CO2 in the air acts like a fertilizer for plants. . . . you get more plant growth. Increasing CO2 levels also affect water transpiration, causing plants to close their pores and sweat less. That means plants will be able to grow in drier climates.
Omni: Does the increase in CO2 have anything to do with people saying the weather is getting worse?
Revelle: People are always saying the weather's getting worse. Actually, the CO2 increase is predicted to temper weather extremes.
Post by: freedumb2003b on April 05, 2015, 01:40:54 PM
Asking that question is about as dangerous as asking, "Did Al Gore say anything inaccurate in An Inconvenient Truth?"
http://www.politifact.com/personalities/rush-limbaugh/
Enjoy! It's just the beginning, but I won't go further.
Politifact got a LOT of those wrong. For example when he said last names are getting rarer and rarer, he did not say just "rare." It was pointing out a trend.
But we know Politifact breaks left anyway. You better come up with a straight FACT that was an intended lie.
Post by: BuzzClik on April 05, 2015, 01:52:05 PM
Politifact got a LOT of those wrong. For example when he said last names are getting rarer and rarer, he did not say just "rare." It was pointing out a trend.Two things: Limbaugh is a documented lying sack of shit. Books have been written... But, the reality is that I didn't accuse Limbaugh of lying. I accused him of being a drug addict. I accused O'Reilly of lying and Coulter of committing voter fraud.
But we know Politifact breaks left anyway. You better come up with a straight FACT that was an intended lie.
(I'm editing my original post to make that clear. But, don't get me wrong -- Limbaugh's lies are famous. And don't give me the "come up with a straight FACT that was an intended lie" bullshit unless you intend to go on every thread where I've been called a liar and tell these jackasses to back off.)
Post by: Carl on April 05, 2015, 01:59:19 PM
Two things: Limbaugh is a documented lying sack of shit. Books have been written... But, the reality is that I didn't accuse Limbaugh of lying. I accused him of being a drug addict. I accused O'Reilly of lying and Coulter of committing voter fraud.
(I'm editing my original post to make that clear. But, don't get me wrong -- Limbaugh's lies are famous. And don't give me the "come up with a straight FACT that was an intended lie" bullshit unless you intend to go on every thread where I've been called a liar and tell these jackasses to back off.)
Did Obama lie when he said "If you like your healthcare plan,you can keep your healthcare plan'?
A simple yes or no question.
Post by: thundley4 on April 05, 2015, 02:02:00 PM
Did Obama lie ?when he said "If you like your healthcare plan,you can keep your healthcare plan'?
A simple yes or no question.
And the answer would still be yes. :rofl:
Post by: BuzzClik on April 05, 2015, 02:24:47 PM
Did Obama lie when he said "If you like your healthcare plan,you can keep your healthcare plan'?I've got my healthcare plan.
A simple yes or no question.
So, nope.
Post by: Big Dog on April 05, 2015, 02:28:08 PM
Two things: Limbaugh is a documented lying sack of shit. Books have been written... But, the reality is that I didn't accuse Limbaugh of lying. I accused him of being a drug addict. I accused O'Reilly of lying and Coulter of committing voter fraud.
Accused? J'Accuse?
Are you saying that people who are addicted to prescription pain medications are bad?
Untrustworthy?
Evil?
Lowly?
To be despised?
Careful, Cap'n Buzz. There be mines in this water.
(http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/images/attachement/jpg/site1/20120517/0013729e4319111ee58204.jpg)
Your friends on Skins' Island are watching.
Post by: BuzzClik on April 05, 2015, 02:31:44 PM
Accused? J'Accuse?Limbaugh sure as hell said all that.
Are you saying that people who are addicted to prescription pain medications are bad?
Untrustworthy?
Evil?
Lowly?
To be despised?
I will give him credit for eventually admitting his addiction and getting help.
Post by: Carl on April 05, 2015, 02:32:18 PM
I've got my healthcare plan.
So, nope.
So those that didn`t don`t matter to you as long as you got yours?
Post by: Delmar on April 05, 2015, 02:34:52 PM
I've got my healthcare plan.
So, nope.
Quote
LBJDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 10:32 AMhttp://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x986196
Original message
F*** you, Jack; I got mine.
Does anyone know where that quote comes from?
I've seen people say that it represents the GOP. I don't really get it how they reconcile that with the Christian ethics many of them supposedly espouse.
Post by: Big Dog on April 05, 2015, 02:36:34 PM
Limbaugh sure as hell said all that.
Ah, now, this is where you move up to the bigs.
Prove it.
5 quotes by Rush Limbaugh. Direct quotes, dates, and citations, for all of it.
If you can't come up with 5, then I'll settle for 3.
If 3 is too much, I'd call one, just one, sufficient to prove the point that he said it, once in his life.
Post by: Big Dog on April 05, 2015, 02:39:37 PM
Limbaugh sure as hell said all that.
And that was a poor attempt at deflection.
I didn't ask you if Limbaugh said it. I asked if you are saying it.
Once again, a simple question with a simple answer. Yes, or no?
Post by: thundley4 on April 05, 2015, 02:40:10 PM
I will give him credit for eventually admitting his addiction and getting help.
Which is more than your fellow drug addicted DUmmies are willing to do.
Post by: Bad Dog on April 05, 2015, 02:44:55 PM
I've got my healthcare plan.
So, nope.
That is just so...progressive of you.
Post by: Delmar on April 05, 2015, 02:50:42 PM
Asking that question is about as dangerous as asking, "Did Al Gore say anything inaccurate in An Inconvenient Truth?"
http://www.politifact.com/personalities/rush-limbaugh/
Enjoy! It's just the beginning, but I won't go further.
No agenda at politifact dot com.
Quote
Gov. Scott Walker says he bought a sweater for $1 at Kohl'shttp://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2015/apr/03/scott-walker/gov-scott-walker-says-he-bought-sweater-1-kohls/
Post by: Bad Dog on April 05, 2015, 02:52:10 PM
Limbaugh has proven to be more teflon/bulletproof than Bill Clinton. O'Reilly the same.
The degree of success of larger-than-life personalities like Limbaugh, O'Reilly, and Coulter is directly proportional to how much they annoy the left, but the left never gets that. They are under the mistaken impression that extreme outrage will kill these pundits, but that outrage only makes them more attractive to their base -- drug addictions, lies, respectively, and voter fraud notwithstanding.
(EDIT: the word "respectively" was added to make it clear who I was accusing of being a drug addict, liar, and fraud.)
They learned from the master, the mighty and omnipotent President Regan. Envy and rage dribble out of every post you make on this subject.
Post by: txradioguy on April 05, 2015, 03:03:42 PM
Asking that question is about as dangerous as asking, "Did Al Gore say anything inaccurate in An Inconvenient Truth?"
http://www.politifact.com/personalities/rush-limbaugh/
Enjoy! It's just the beginning, but I won't go further.
No really...you should go further.
Politifact is about as credible as citing Wikipedia. Which is to say its not at all.
I've read that link before from one.of your fellow Primitives at the DUmp.
The whole thing has been easily debunked. That's the thing about being able to read the transcript. It tells you what Politifact won't.
The only ones that still believe it are easily fooled uncurious Libs like you.
If you plan on staying here awhile you need to realize that you're in the Big Leagues here and bring your A Game...if.you.have one that is.
Post by: txradioguy on April 05, 2015, 03:06:43 PM
I've got my healthcare plan.
So, nope.
Then please explain how it is that there are more people now than before Obamacare was shoved down our throats?
He also said prices would go down...they didnt...they've skyrocketed.
Post by: txradioguy on April 05, 2015, 03:07:42 PM
Limbaugh sure as hell said all that.
I will give him credit for eventually admitting his addiction and getting help.
He hasn't said that in close to 15 years. Its well doccumented that once Rush developed his addiction he stopped saying anything about addicts or addictions.
You're failing badly here.
Try harder.
Post by: SVPete on April 05, 2015, 03:20:31 PM
Quote
panader0 (11,964 posts)
17. My GF works as station manager for three stations in our town (approx 50,000) Rush has been a fixture for years. I hated it, but the station is basically controlled by the advertisers (they place ads in shows they pick), and she nor I had any say.
Imagine my joy when she told me that Rush and Hannity are finally being dropped (to be replaced by a Classic Country station).
This group of stations (Cherry Creek Radio, a privately owned group) has about 45 stations in small towns in the West.
Goodbye Rush.... At last.
Hmmmmm ... Butte, MT? Montrose, CO? Williston, ND? Sierra Vista, AZ?
Butte and Montrose are too small - ~33K and ~20K people, respectively. Williston is ~21K. Sierra Vista is ~44K, the closest to the 50K he claimed. KTAN AM is described on Cherry Creek Radio's website (http://www.cherrycreekradio.com/Stations/5118372) as "News Talk", but the station doesn't have a website, and I've not found a program listing for the station. The closest I've come is this webpage, whose last comment, May 2014, gives the heart of the line-up as, "Beck to Rush to Hannity". Sounds like this dude's post is either at least a partial bouncy, or he's over-estimated his town's population by 50%-100%.
As to his whine, here's how commercial radio works. Radio stations make money by selling advertising (and sometimes air time to programs). Sounds like this particular station sells ad time, not air time. Advertisers pick the station, time slot, and program in which the most potential customers they want are likely to be listening. IOW, if those advertisers place ads on Rush, it's because he gets listeners. If those advertisers place ads on Rachel Madcow, it's because she gets listeners - or more appropriately and accurately, they did't place ads on Rachel Madcow's radio show because she didn't get listeners. So it comes down to stations carrying - or not carrying - Rush because people want to hear him.
As a related aside, Err America was such an utter failure that it couldn't make it in the SF Bay Area - SF, Berserkeley, and Oakland being in its listening area! And the one ProgTalk station that tried to rise out Err America's ashes is now gone, replaced by more urbane, less wacky liberals. Meantime, KSFO 560 has been solid ConservaTalk for 20 years and 3 months. (http://www.radiolineup.com/stations/KTAN-AM)
Post by: SVPete on April 05, 2015, 03:26:54 PM
He hasn't said that in close to 15 years. Its well doccumented that once Rush developed his addiction he stopped saying anything about addicts or addictions.
You're failing badly here.
Try harder.
Rush Limbaugh - Prescription drug addiction (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rush_Limbaugh#Prescription_drug_addiction)
Wikipedia
Quote
On October 3, 2003, the National Enquirer reported that Limbaugh was being investigated for illegally obtaining the prescription drugs oxycodone and hydrocodone. Other news outlets quickly confirmed the investigation.[138] He admitted to listeners on his radio show on October 10, 2003, that he was addicted to prescription painkillers and stated that he would enter inpatient treatment for 30 days, immediately after the broadcast.[139] Limbaugh stated his addiction to painkillers resulted from several years of severe back pain heightened by a botched surgery intended to correct those problems.
A subsequent investigation into whether Limbaugh had violated Florida's doctor shopping laws was launched by the Palm Beach State Attorney, which raised privacy issues when investigators seized Limbaugh's private medical records looking for evidence of crimes. Roy Black, one of Limbaugh's attorneys, stated that "Rush Limbaugh was singled out for prosecution because of who he is. We believe the state attorney's office is applying a double standard."[140] On November 9, 2005, following two years of investigations, Assistant State Attorney James L. Martz requested that the court set aside Limbaugh's doctor–patient confidentiality rights and allow the state to question his physicians.[141] Limbaugh's attorney opposed the prosecutor's efforts to interview his doctors on the basis of patient privacy rights, and argued that the prosecutor had violated Limbaugh's Fourth Amendment rights by illegally seizing his medical records. The American Civil Liberties Union issued a statement in agreement and filed an amicus curiae brief in support of Limbaugh.[142][143] On December 12, 2005, Judge David F. Crow delivered a ruling prohibiting the State of Florida from questioning Limbaugh's physicians about "the medical condition of the patient and any information disclosed to the health care practitioner by the patient in the course of the care and treatment of the patient."[144]
Just for the info.
Post by: obumazombie on April 05, 2015, 04:00:46 PM
I've got my healthcare plan.
So, nope.
That's not going to be good enough.
Your messiah said "if you like your (health care) plan, you can keep your (health care) plan". "If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor".
Did you already have a health care plan when your messiah took Jonathan Gruber's advice and lied repeatedly a knowing lie about healthcare ?
Did you like the plan, if you had one at that time ?
Did you keep that same exact plan from when owebuma Grubered ?
Did you have a doctor at the time owebuma Gribered ?
Did you like your doctor if you had a doctor from the time owebuma Grubered ?
Did you keep your doctor you might have had at the time owebuma Gribered ?
My guess is you used semantics and polemics to be dishonest yet again.
Post by: BuzzClik on April 05, 2015, 04:41:10 PM
I owe you all an apology. Put it on my tab. :rofl:
Post by: txradioguy on April 05, 2015, 04:44:36 PM
Oh, my. I seem to have stirred the hive.You think waaaay too much of your posting skills and your effect on us n00b.anic:
I owe you all an apology. Put it on my tab. :rofl:
That's what you get for limiting your world view to an echo chamber.
Post by: BuzzClik on April 05, 2015, 04:56:37 PM
You think waaaay too much of your posting skills and your effect on us n00b.
I am fully aware of my capabilities and my limitations. Additionally, I have quickly sized up the aptitudes of those posting here. For 90% of you, a winning argument is to call me a liar or finding inventive ways of suggesting I'm gay. Or addressing me with a string of obscenities and then immediately warning me to be on my best behavior.
I was proven wrong on one comment I made (and I admitted it to a credible poster), and I underestimated the depth of character of another Cave dweller (I openly admitted that, too).
For the rest -- I ain't impressed.
Post by: txradioguy on April 05, 2015, 05:08:56 PM
I am fully aware of my capabilities and my limitations. Additionally, I have quickly sized up the aptitudes of those posting here. For 90% of you, a winning argument is to call me a liar or finding inventive ways of suggesting I'm gay. Or addressing me with a string of obscenities and then immediately warning me to be on my best behavior.You haven't met 90% of the members of this place.
I was proven wrong on one comment I made (and I admitted it to a credible poster), and I underestimated the depth of character of another Cave dweller (I openly admitted that, too).
For the rest -- I ain't impressed.
You're assessment is not only false...it's...how did you put it...a "broad brush".
Your talking points on Limbaugh were proven false...many times over by better researchers than me and you got called on it.
If you don't like it here...why did you show up?
No one is keeping you here?
We're not the DUmp...you won't get banned for being a Progressive at a Conservative site.
You're mistaken is thinking you can run talking points by the very people who've debunked the same crap for years.
You say something you need to have credible sources to back it up. That's how it works here.
Like I said...coming here is moving up to the Big Leagues...your debate games needs to improve at the same time.
Creating strawman and whinging about minutiae just makes you look petulant and childish.
Post by: Bad Dog on April 05, 2015, 05:15:10 PM
I am fully aware of my capabilities and my limitations. Additionally, I have quickly sized up the aptitudes of those posting here. For 90% of you, a winning argument is to call me a liar or finding inventive ways of suggesting I'm gay. Or addressing me with a string of obscenities and then immediately warning me to be on my best behavior.
I was proven wrong on one comment I made (and I admitted it to a credible poster), and I underestimated the depth of character of another Cave dweller (I openly admitted that, too).
For the rest -- I ain't impressed.
Far from it buzzikins, you like most DUmmies are a legend in your own mind. Too many participation trophies in your past.
Post by: Delmar on April 05, 2015, 05:22:53 PM
I am fully aware of my capabilities and my limitations. Additionally, I have quickly sized up the aptitudes of those posting here. For 90% of you, a winning argument is to call me a liar or finding inventive ways of suggesting I'm gay. Or addressing me with a string of obscenities and then immediately warning me to be on my best behavior.(http://i1095.photobucket.com/albums/i475/Delmar59/large_magnum_force_blu-raysubs_magnum_force_blu-ray_zpsoidtdxk6.jpg) (http://s1095.photobucket.com/user/Delmar59/media/large_magnum_force_blu-raysubs_magnum_force_blu-ray_zpsoidtdxk6.jpg.html)
I was proven wrong on one comment I made (and I admitted it to a credible poster), and I underestimated the depth of character of another Cave dweller (I openly admitted that, too).
For the rest -- I ain't impressed.
Post by: Ptarmigan on April 05, 2015, 05:35:51 PM
Post by: obumazombie on April 05, 2015, 06:19:46 PM
They always say Rush is doomed. They say that the nth time! :mental:
Which brings us to today's trivia question...
What is the longest word in the English language with no vowels ?
Post by: Big Dog on April 05, 2015, 06:26:35 PM
Which brings us to today's trivia question...
What is the longest word in the English language with no vowels ?
Pppfffffft!
[youtube] http://youtube.com/watch?v=DlkxQMxJmEU
Post by: 98ZJUSMC on April 06, 2015, 02:50:47 AM
I think BLS is one of those 10 people that spam the Internet with the anti Rush campaign BS.
There are that many?
:)
Post by: docstew on April 06, 2015, 09:06:04 PM
Quote
I've got my healthcare plan.
So, nope.
The implication behind what 0 was saying is that you could keep the plan you had BEFORE 0care was passed, with no changes (hence, the "you can keep" it part). Do you still have that plan? and how much did the premiums increase? And what about the rest of America? Did everyone get to keep their plan?
Post by: obumazombie on April 06, 2015, 09:09:55 PM
The implication behind what 0 was saying is that you could keep the plan you had BEFORE 0care was passed, with no changes (hence, the "you can keep" it part). Do you still have that plan? and how much did the premiums increase? And what about the rest of America? Did everyone get to keep their plan?
If enough people ask him the same question often enough, he might eventually get around to answering it.
Post by: J P Sousa on April 06, 2015, 10:00:18 PM
Quote
project_bluebook (237 posts)
6. He doesn't care
He would just claim the gays ran him out of business and sucker dumbass republicans to donate millions to his cause, kind of like that bigoted pizza shop in Indiana.
:lmao: Rush will never need donations but I do buy "Two If By Tea" (his Iced Tea) raspberry is my favorite. :-)
Post by: Big Dog on April 07, 2015, 12:12:16 AM
Which brings us to today's trivia question...
What is the longest word in the English language with no vowels ?
Did I get it right?
Post by: obumazombie on April 07, 2015, 01:08:57 AM
Did I get it right?
You were close enough for a $1.00 cigar.
Post by: freedumb2003b on April 07, 2015, 01:16:05 AM
Two things: Limbaugh is a documented lying sack of shit. Books have been written... But, the reality is that I didn't accuse Limbaugh of lying. I accused him of being a drug addict. I accused O'Reilly of lying and Coulter of committing voter fraud.
(I'm editing my original post to make that clear. But, don't get me wrong -- Limbaugh's lies are famous. And don't give me the "come up with a straight FACT that was an intended lie" bullshit unless you intend to go on every thread where I've been called a liar and tell these jackasses to back off.)
Yes you did:
Quote
Quote from: txradioguy on April 05, 2015, 01:08:54 PM
What lies has Limbaugh told specifically?QuoteAsking that question is about as dangerous as asking, "Did Al Gore say anything inaccurate in An Inconvenient Truth?"
http://www.politifact.com/personalities/rush-limbaugh/
Enjoy! It's just the beginning, but I won't go further.
You can't even keep your lies straight.
And I pointed out that leftist politifct rated Rush's OPINIONS -- and then you lied some more.
Talk about lying liars -- buzzy, you are one of the biggest liars to ever tread on ANY forum, liberal or smart.
Still waiting for science answers on the other thread btw.