The Conservative Cave

Current Events => Politics => Topic started by: Willow on July 16, 2008, 08:26:55 PM

Title: Smackdown!
Post by: Willow on July 16, 2008, 08:26:55 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nF02z_9S50



race for Senate seat in Colorado. Schaffer vs. Udall!
Title: Re: Smackdown!
Post by: BEG on July 16, 2008, 08:33:34 PM
OMG that was devastating.   :rotf:
Title: Re: Smackdown!
Post by: Rebel on July 16, 2008, 08:51:30 PM
 :lmao:   :nutkick:
Title: Re: Smackdown!
Post by: VelvetElvis on July 16, 2008, 09:53:30 PM
Excellent!!!
More of our guys need to use the same tactic on the Dhimmis.  Dozens of them have done/said similar things when the country was behind the war effort, and then flip flopped when it became politically expedient to do so.

Use their own words to damn them!
Title: Re: Smackdown!
Post by: Chris_ on July 16, 2008, 10:07:07 PM
Brutal!
Title: Re: Smackdown!
Post by: Chris_ on July 16, 2008, 10:10:54 PM
Excellent!!!
More of our guys need to use the same tactic on the Dhimmis.  Dozens of them have done/said similar things when the country was behind the war effort, and then flip flopped when it became politically expedient to do so.

Use their own words to damn them!
Agreed -- time to trot out the rhetoric from when it was easy. 
Title: Re: Smackdown!
Post by: Flame on July 17, 2008, 08:54:45 AM
OUCH....that one's gonna leave a mark!!!  :hammer: :hammer: 

 :rotf: :rotf:
Title: Re: Smackdown!
Post by: Splashdown on July 17, 2008, 09:56:21 AM
That was beautiful. I think I'm getting teary!


I love when hypocrisy gets exposed to sunlight.
Title: Re: Smackdown!
Post by: mamacags on July 17, 2008, 10:01:54 AM
Ohhhhhhhh that was so juicy I want to bask in the afterglow! :rotf:
Title: Re: Smackdown!
Post by: DixieBelle on July 17, 2008, 10:04:47 AM
LOVE IT!!!!!!!!

Reminds me of this......

Quote
In my last article, some readers asked me to help explain the reason we went to war with Iraq. I contend that the situation was very different from the way Michael Moore depicts the events leading up to the war in his film Fahrenheit 9-11. Moore conveniently leaves out much of history in his version of the story. Where he shows kids flying kites and men drinking tea, I see an underlying threat to peace not only in the Middle East but “across the pond” as well. Given Saddam Hussein’s hatred for America, and the fact that he harboured and supported terrorist, the decision to remove him from power was, in my opinon, an inevitable necessity. But I am getting ahead of myself. Let me first bring everyone up to speed on a little history concerning Iraq:

In 1991, Saddam Hussein invaded and occupied Kuwait, losing the support of the United States. The first President Bush assembled a global coalition, including many Arab states, and threw Saddam out after forty-three days of bombing and a hundred hours of ground operations. The U.S.-led coalition then withdrew, leaving the Kurds and the Shiites, who had risen against Saddam Hussein at our urging, to Saddam’s revenge.

As a condition for ending the conflict, the United Nations imposed a number of requirements on Iraq, among them disarmament of all weapons of mass destruction, stocks used to make such weapons, and laboratories necessary to do the work. Saddam Hussein agreed, and an inspection system was set up to ensure compliance. And though he repeatedly lied, delayed, and obstructed the inspections work, the inspectors found and destroyed far more weapons of mass destruction capability than were destroyed in the Gulf War, including thousands of chemical weapons, large volumes of chemical and biological stocks, a number of missiles and warheads, a major lab equipped to produce anthrax and other bio-weapons, as well as substantial nuclear facilities.

In 1998, Saddam Hussein pressured the United Nations to lift the sanctions by threatening to stop all cooperation with the inspectors. In an attempt to resolve the situation, the UN, unwisely in my view, agreed to put limits on inspections of designated “sovereign sites” including the so-called presidential palaces, which in reality were huge compounds well suited to hold weapons labs, stocks, and records which Saddam Hussein was required by UN resolution to turn over. When Saddam blocked the inspection process, the inspectors left. As a result, President Clinton, with the British and others, ordered an intensive four-day air assault, Operation Desert Fox, on known and suspected weapons of mass destruction sites and other military targets.

In 1998, the United States also changed its underlying policy toward Iraq from containment to regime change and began to examine options to effect such a change, including support for Iraqi opposition leaders within the country and abroad.

In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001.

It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security.

OOOOOPS!!!! Did I forget to put that in quotes?  Shame on me. Allow me to clarify:

You just read part of the Floor Speech of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton on S.J. Res. 45, A Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq ,October 10, 2002 speech

http://moorewatch.com/index.php/weblog/comments/the_case_for_war/

 :fuelfire: :rocker2:
Title: Re: Smackdown!
Post by: WinOne4TheGipper on July 17, 2008, 10:08:41 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nF02z_9S50



race for Senate seat in Colorado. Schaffer vs. Udall!

Good job, Schaffer!
Title: Re: Smackdown!
Post by: Chris_ on July 17, 2008, 10:23:41 AM
We're going to have Bob at an Ice Cream social (fundraiser) at my town councilman/radio talk show host/neighbor's home this Sunday. 

I think this just secured my vote for the man.
Title: Re: Smackdown!
Post by: jtyangel on July 17, 2008, 11:02:00 AM
That was sweet!
Title: Re: Smackdown!
Post by: dandi on July 17, 2008, 11:15:26 AM
Just think, if Captain Queeg would do that to Senator Hussein, he might have a lot more support.
Title: Re: Smackdown!
Post by: Chris_ on July 17, 2008, 11:22:01 AM
You and I both know that Senator McLame is too deeply wedded to the principle of bending over and grabbing the ankles for the Democrats to ever show a political spine, or adherance to any principle held by those - such as myself - stupid enough to keep electing His Lordship.
Title: Re: Smackdown!
Post by: dandi on July 17, 2008, 11:27:21 AM
You and I both know that Senator McLame is too deeply wedded to the principle of bending over and grabbing the ankles for the Democrats to ever show a political spine, or adherance to any principle held by those - such as myself - stupid enough to keep electing His Lordship.

Yeah, but he's going to wake up any day now and be Super Conservative!

At least that's what I keep hearing.....