The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: dutch508 on March 11, 2015, 10:59:45 AM
-
How did they sneek legislation into a bill? Were all the (D)s out masterbating to Hillary's presser?
Cali_Democrat (23,399 posts) http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141035612
GOP Sneaks Anti-Abortion Language Into Bipartisan Human Trafficking Bill
Sneaky little shits, aren't they?
OMG! GOPers pulled a (D) trick on them! :yahoo:
Stuart G (9,796 posts)
1. Far beyond "sneaky shits"...bit shits, worse..assholes of the worst kind..Thanks for posting..k & r
This is what they do...so, there is a big discussion going on about some sort of letter written against the President, and the assholes try to get this one passed without telling anyone..with language unnoticed ...It is what they did to screw the post office..same shit.
And it is on purpose, thought about long ahead of time...****en assholes of the worst kind..
That is exactly who they are...!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Maybe they should have said you can read it after we pass it.
elehhhhna (28,700 posts)
2. thats fraud
The irony is so thick in here....
Maineman (759 posts)
3. Deceitful, dishonest, dishonorable, underhanded... just normal Republicans.
I ask again... just how did the (R)s sneek language into the bill? Were all teh (D)s sleeping again?
Stuart G (9,796 posts)
7. A quote from Planned Parenthood about the language..(from the above article..)
Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards said women who are trafficking victims should be able to have access to safe abortions.
"A bill that was supposed to help women is instead being used to hurt women," Richards said. "The Senate should protect victims of human trafficking, but should not do so at the expense of women's access to safe and legal abortion. The majority of human trafficking victims are women and girls, and they need access to the full range of reproductive health care services without barriers."
anything PP puts out is :bs:
GoneFishin (1,709 posts)
10. In any other legal setting obtaining consent from the parties by deception would be fraud. What lying, cheating motherfarckers.
Like.... Obamacare?
Dawson Leery (12,283 posts)
15. This is why I do not support religious charities. Look what Rick Warren did in Africa with the "kill the gays" propaganda.
:stoner:
-
Sneaky little shits, aren't they?
You mean like when Progressives slip little hand grenades into things like the Defense Budget...then go out and slam Republicans for voting down the measure and accuse repubs of hating the military?
-
You mean like when Progressives slip little hand grenades into things like the Defense Budget...then go out and slam Republicans for voting down the measure and accuse repubs of hating the military?
Or take an appropriations bill from the House,strip out every last letter and period,add back in 2000 pages of unread spending and taxes and then say it was legal because it originated as a House bill.
-
What the primitives don't realize is this:
Every so-called "dirty trick" used by Republicans, we learned from the Democrats.
It's not hard, every time the primitives whine about a "dirty trick" by Republicans, to find lots and lots of Democrat precedents.
-
What the primitives don't realize is this:
Every so-called "dirty trick" used by Republicans, we learned from the Democrats.
It's not hard, every time the primitives whine about a "dirty trick" by Republicans, to find lots and lots of Democrat precedents.
Now if they will just learn to take names off tombstones and vote for them....and often....we might get somewhere.
-
Now if they will just learn to take names off tombstones and vote for them....and often....we might get somewhere.
Yeah, that burns me up something bad, whenever a primitive accuses Republicans of stuffing ballot boxes or gerrymandering.
Who the ****'s been doing all these things the past 200 or so years?
-
What the primitives don't realize is this:
Every so-called "dirty trick" used by Republicans, we learned from the Democrats.
It's not hard, every time the primitives whine about a "dirty trick" by Republicans, to find lots and lots of Democrat precedents.
Somehow they are under the mistaken belief that only they are allowed to pull these little tricks.
-
Cali_Democrat (23,399 posts) http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141035612
GOP Sneaks Anti-Abortion Language Into Bipartisan Human Trafficking Bill
Sneaky little shits, aren't they?
Oh, you mean like that VA funding bill that was voted against by the Republicans that you assholes used incessantly to try and label the Republicans as anti-military because it had 61 ****ING AMENDMENTS TO IT?
-
I.e.
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-RodNgdhs3vE/U4oF3qmnrvI/AAAAAAAAQ8Y/QOEqFx7wOrA/s1600/VA+HEALTH+CARE+02.jpg)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023842048
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:SN01982:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/L?d113:./temp/~bda6svH:1[1-61]%28Amendments_For_S.1982%29&./temp/~bdWv0G
Links don't work. It's found here:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/republicans-va-funding_b_5395698.html
-
I.e.
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-RodNgdhs3vE/U4oF3qmnrvI/AAAAAAAAQ8Y/QOEqFx7wOrA/s1600/VA+HEALTH+CARE+02.jpg)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023842048
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:SN01982:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/L?d113:./temp/~bda6svH:1[1-61]%28Amendments_For_S.1982%29&./temp/~bdWv0G
Links don't work. It's found here:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/republicans-va-funding_b_5395698.html
Bu-bu-bu-but that was different!!!
-
The language they are clutching pearls over is the standard language that goes into almost all spending bills that prohibits federal money being spent on abortions except in cases of rape. The language was in the bill when Democrats on the committee voted to approve the bill.