The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: dutch508 on February 22, 2015, 04:48:32 PM
-
boston bean (21,969 posts) http://upload.democraticunderground.com/10026257031
The origin of a RW hack job that some lefties fall for....
Hillary Clinton's ties to corporate donors, lobbyists while secretary of state scrutinized
Hillary Clinton's ties to large corporations have come under more scrutiny after it was revealed that dozens of companies that have donated millions to her family's foundation also lobbied the State Department during her tenure as secretary of state.
The Wall Street Journal reports that the 60 companies who lobbied Clinton's State Department between 2009 and 2013 donated over $26 million to the Clinton Foundation in that period. The donors include instantly recognizable names like General Electric, Exxon Mobil, and Boeing
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/02/20/hillary-clinton-ties-to-corporate-donors-lobbyists-while-secretary-state/
Ok, folks, it FAUX and the WSJ.... Still want to make your case using this flimsy right wing attack machine?
Media Recycle Old News To Attack Hillary Clinton Over Foundation Donors
http://mediamatters.org/research/2015/02/19/media-recycle-old-news-to-attack-hillary-clinto/202564
Use to be a day and time these were recognized for what they were... right wing hatchet jobs ie... LIES, twisted to fit a narrative that is not based in reality.
Yeah... What difference at this point does it matter who is funding Hillary?
MoonRiver (20,606 posts)
2. So sad that even on on DU Hillary haters have to resort to FAUX to make their "case."
Guess that's what people do when they have nothing else, but still.
I would wonder why the left wing media isn't covering news stories and making up others (Scott Walker on Barry's religion)
Enrique (25,883 posts)
4. Hillary's ties to lobbyists aren't a right-wing creation of course Fox News's intentions are not to enlighten, but they are exploiting an issue that is real.
Obama used it against her in 2008, and of course he had lobbyist issues of his own.
VanillaRhapsody (16,324 posts)
145. Oh thats what you think? Could be that you have a preconceived notion based on
apparently bullshit....but I have mountains of evidence that happen to be public records by the way....but you are concerned about what "I" have or havent't read!
How ironic!
More evidence of the Tone Deafness that is afflicting this site!
MFrohike (1,383 posts)
147. It could be. Of course, it could be the fact you're posting stuff that has her taking stands that both support and contradict your claim that she's a liberal on economic matters. If you'd read it, you'd have the sense to edit out, or explain, the stuff that contradicts you. That is how actual arguments work.
OKNancy (33,933 posts)
11. My problem with this and other smears is making a mountain out of a molehill
This really isn't that big a deal. The "oh no, Hillary...blah blah" is ridiculous.
Leith (421 posts)
62. A Reichwinger Tried That On Me
I asked him that I'm supposed to turn against HRC because some company donated to an international charity?
He said "yeah."
I said "scroo that."
And I'm not even a big Clinton supporter (not a detractor, either). I recognized a hatchet job when I saw it.
shitty mole attempt is shitty.
JackRiddler (22,060 posts)
104. Oh my god this is so lame. Foxnews also often gets the weather right. Therefore it's not snowing outside!
-
Hey DUmbasses,why is it that she has to keep silent because her polling numbers drop when she talks?
-
It is funny that the DUmmie OP is using a link to an organization that Hillary (in her own words) help create to defend Hillary.