The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Carl on February 12, 2015, 01:12:00 PM
-
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026216339
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 12:04 PM
Star Member Kurska (4,876 posts)
"If we have same-sex marriage today, we'll have incest and polygamy tomorrow" Good
Sometimes I wonder at the people in this nation, left and right, who seem to lose considerable sleep thinking about the possibility that other consenting adults might be engaging in sexual behaviors that they personally do not approve of. I think about how they seem to lay petrified in their bed, looking concerned at their lover as this thought dominates their mind "How can I love you if I can't enforce our exact sexual behaviors on a nation of 300 million through force of law?".
We see this again and again in our society. There appears to be an overwhelming and to me frankly bizarre desire of many people to micromanage the intimate relations of others. I understand in a way where they are coming from. They are disgusted by the idea that someone could be engaging in anal, incest, a relationship with multiple partners, bondage or a myriad of sexual behaviors that aren't sex in the missionary position for the purpose of procreation. This is a desire driven by disgust. An urge to crush that which they do not like and enforce their standards on others.
They have their alternative explanations. They say it is for good of society (where they got permission to engage is social engineering related to the sex lives of others still alludes me). They claim it violates some sort of natural law as they wear clothing, eat processed foods and zoom around in the sky in planes at speeds factors of 100 higher than any human was "evolved" to travel.
In comes down to this, consenting adults can form any kind of relationship they want to. You may find it disgusting or unnatural, but it isn't about you. It was never about you. You have zero right to ever dictates the terms of two consenting adults sexual behaviors. You do not have a right to engage in social engineering. My sex life is sovereign territory over which I demand exclusive domain. Until I directly, physically and without consent interfere with the domain of another's body, your opinion simply does not matter.
I'm gay myself, but I think gay rights is a merely part of a larger struggle against the sexual tyranny that has existed in most human societies. I like and predict that it will be part of the spear tip that will finally and blessedly slaughters this terrible beast.
My body, my rules.
This is a lesson both the left and the right could do well to learn.
Go **** yourself pervert.
Response to Kurska (Original post)
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 12:09 PM
Star Member COLGATE4 (6,457 posts)
1. There are legitimate medical issues around incest
which can't be brushed away lightly. Polygamy, however seems to not have been a problem in other cultures and times, up to and including today's radical members of Latter Day Saints who have communities practicing polygamy. Wouldn't bother me to see it legitimized rather than being 'hidden in plain sight'.
Response to COLGATE4 (Reply #1)
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 12:11 PM
Star Member Kurska (4,876 posts)
3. Those same issues exist for many couples with recessive genes for terrible disorders.
Yet we don't demand genetic testing prior to the issuance of a marriage certificate.
Well some people have, those people are called eugenicists and they have been rightly run out of society.
Keep in mind this issue is entirely irrelevant for homosexual incest.
:puke:
-
I bet the poster thinks NAMBLA members are "normal" as well....this is just sick.
-
I bet the poster thinks NAMBLA members are "normal" as well....this is just sick.
Peep my sig. They prove it every f'n day.
-
I'm gay myself, but I think gay rights is a merely part of a larger struggle against the sexual tyranny that has existed in most human societies. I like and predict that it will be part of the spear tip that will finally and blessedly slaughters this terrible beast.
I bet the poster thinks NAMBLA members are "normal" as well....this is just sick.
The slippery slope is what pedophiles wanted when they joined the push for ghey marriage. Force ghey marriage on people, then they will accept other perversions like incest, pedophilia and bestiality more easily.
-
I'm gay myself, but I think gay rights is a merely part of a larger struggle against the sexual tyranny that has existed in most human societies. I like and predict that it will be part of the spear tip that will finally and blessedly slaughters this terrible beast.
Laying the groundwork for legitimizing bestiality.
Animals are people too !
-
Laying the groundwork for legitimizing bestiality.
Animals are people too !
I'd screw a badger before I'd do a DUmmy.
-
I'd screw a badger before I'd do a DUmmy.
Honeybadger don't care.
-
I wonder how the OP feels about a couple of consenting adults sharing a 6 year old for a little sexual romp?
-
Honeybadger don't care.
I used to be married to her sister.
-
Incest increases risk for genetic problems and other bad things. Reason why incest is a no-no.
-
Incest increases risk for genetic problems and other bad things. Reason why incest is a no-no.
Yeah, but liberals think love conquers all.
-
Star Member Kurska (4,876 posts)
3. Those same issues exist for many couples with recessive genes for terrible disorders.
Yet we don't demand genetic testing prior to the issuance of a marriage certificate. ...
So ... because existing protections are incomplete all protections should be discarded? I'd say that's the logic of a tantrumming 3YO: It's not FAI----AIR!. Except that would be an insult to tantrumming 3YOs.
But I'll give this gay DU member 3/4 of a kudo for consistency in his/her egoism. If homosexuality is OK - not sure how they square that with their probable belief in materialistic Evolution - then why not incest, polygamy & polyandry, pedophilia, and bestiality.
-
Liberals embracing perversion...I am so not surprised. This is why there are days I will not visit the DUmp with my Mole. Its like wading through a cesspool, the hate, filth and evil wears away at you.
-
DUmmie motto: If it feels good , do it....if it hurts someone, do it....if it degrades society, do it....if it benefits me, do it.
In other words, anything goes.
-
So ... because existing protections are incomplete all protections should be discarded? I'd say that's the logic of a tantrumming 3YO: It's not FAI----AIR!. Except that would be an insult to tantrumming 3YOs.
But I'll give this gay DU member 3/4 of a kudo for consistency in his/her egoism. If homosexuality is OK - not sure how they square that with their probable belief in materialistic Evolution - then why not incest, polygamy & polyandry, pedophilia, and bestiality.
That's a mixed bag, biologically speaking.
Homosexuality is a biological dead end- homos don't pass on the imaginary 'gay genes'.
Polygyny and polyandry would promote genetic diversity,
Pedophilia (sex with prepubescent children) and bestiality would have no effect, from a strictly genetic view.
'Incest' is a legal term, not a biological one, so it can't be pigeonholed into a single genetic category.
-
Liberals embracing perversion...I am so not surprised. This is why there are days I will not visit the DUmp with my Mole. Its like wading through a cesspool, the hate, filth and evil wears away at you.
Much the same way that Catholic priests become drained emotionally and physically after an exorcism.
-
That's a mixed bag, biologically speaking.
Homosexuality is a biological dead end- homos don't pass on the imaginary 'gay genes'.
Polygyny and polyandry would promote genetic diversity,
Pedophilia (sex with prepubescent children) and bestiality would have no effect, from a strictly genetic view.
'Incest' is a legal term, not a biological one, so it can't be pigeonholed into a single genetic category.
Before you know it libs will be trying to mainstream necrophelia.
-
Before you know it libs will be trying to mainstream necrophelia.
'Crack open a cold one' won't be about beer anymore.
Look what happened to 'he blew the tranny'.
-
Before you know it libs will be trying to mainstream necrophelia.
Thanks for supplying a glaring omission from my list of egoists' perversions!
-
Thanks for supplying a glaring omission from my list of egoists' perversions!
(http://static1.squarespace.com/static/537e0722e4b0c3338dfc5521/t/53dd4a9ae4b01c361c9810b4/1407011496490/question-31842991.jpeg)
-
^Inconceivable !
-
(http://static1.squarespace.com/static/537e0722e4b0c3338dfc5521/t/53dd4a9ae4b01c361c9810b4/1407011496490/question-31842991.jpeg)
Egoist: (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/egoist)
1. a self-centered or selfish person (opposed to altruist).
Egoism: (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/egoism)
1
a: a doctrine that individual self-interest is the actual motive of all conscious action
b: a doctrine that individual self-interest is the valid end of all actions
2: excessive concern for oneself with or without exaggerated feelings of self-importance
-
Egoist: (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/egoist)
Egoism: (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/egoism)
I don't see anything there about proclivities to participate in sexual paraphilias or alternative relationships. Something you inferred?
-
Incest increases risk for genetic problems and other bad things. Reason why incest is a no-no.
Being queer increases the risk of autoimmune and intestinal rupture problems and other bad things. Reason why being queer is a no-no :)
-
I don't see anything there about proclivities to participate in sexual paraphilias or alternative relationships. Something you inferred?
I was using "egoist" as a term describing a self-centered narcissistic world view. I guess I was less than clear. Lo siento.