The Conservative Cave
Current Events => General Discussion => Topic started by: obumazombie on February 10, 2015, 09:13:17 AM
-
They only show up because they are forced to when their is no hope of hiding that aspect of their current agenda...
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/scott-whitlock/2015/02/09/rosie-odonnell-brian-williamss-lies-show-journalists-dont-tell-truth (http://newsbusters.org/blogs/scott-whitlock/2015/02/09/rosie-odonnell-brian-williamss-lies-show-journalists-dont-tell-truth)
Rosie is only saying the obvious that has been know for quite some time by conservatives and can no longer be denied.
-
They only show up because they are forced to when their is no hope of hiding that aspect of their current agenda...
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/scott-whitlock/2015/02/09/rosie-odonnell-brian-williamss-lies-show-journalists-dont-tell-truth (http://newsbusters.org/blogs/scott-whitlock/2015/02/09/rosie-odonnell-brian-williamss-lies-show-journalists-dont-tell-truth)
Rosie is only saying the obvious that has been know for quite some time by conservatives and can no longer be denied.
Are you suggesting it's little more than me-too CYA?
-
Are you suggesting it's little more than me-too CYA?
I don't know because I don't understand your question.
I do know that lib journalists spin, distract, omit, take out of context, pervert quotes, and outright lie to advance their lib agenda.
Up until recently no lib in good standing has admitted as much.
They all say the idea of a liberal media is a conservative construct.
-
I don't know because I don't understand your question.
I do know that lib journalists spin, distract, omit, take out of context, pervert quotes, and outright lie to advance their lib agenda.
Up until recently no lib in good standing has admitted as much.
They all say the idea of a liberal media is a conservative construct.
I didn't read far enough in the article to understand where RO'D was coming from. I thought you might be suggesting that she was jumping on the condemn-Brian-Williams bandwagon as future CYA, so she could claim she had condemned him (while in reality having only done so after his lying was blatantly clear). I didn't see that she had shifted into condemning big corporations (one of whom writes her paychecks). As if Brian Williams were a corporate sock-puppet rather than the creature of the MSM that he is.
RO'D's problem with the MSM isn't it's lack of accuracy, but that aren't loony-toony enough!
-
I find it amazing that this cunning stunt (sic) has to search as far afield as Lance Armstrong for a liar of equivalent degree. One would think other, more immediate and accomplished prevaricators would veritably leap to mind...
(http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01687/obama-460_1687354c.jpg)
-
I didn't read far enough in the article to understand where RO'D was coming from. I thought you might be suggesting that she was jumping on the condemn-Brian-Williams bandwagon as future CYA, so she could claim she had condemned him (while in reality having only done so after his lying was blatantly clear). I didn't see that she had shifted into condemning big corporations (one of whom writes her paychecks). As if Brian Williams were a corporate sock-puppet rather than the creature of the MSM that he is.
RO'D's problem with the MSM isn't it's lack of accuracy, but that aren't loony-toony enough!
Interesting...
I don't generally give libs like Rosie credit for that kind of strategizing.
They are devious enough, but I doubt smart enough.
But maybe I am underestimating her, which would be a very dangerous thing to do with any lib.