The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: franksolich on February 05, 2015, 07:36:12 PM

Title: primitives discuss recent edition of Sports Illustrated
Post by: franksolich on February 05, 2015, 07:36:12 PM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026184623

Oh my.

It's a big thread, but one's disappointed none of the Four Horsewomen of the Femapocalyse--BainsBane, redqueen, the seabeyond bitch, or boston bean--have showed up yet.

Quote
adigal (5,157 posts)   Thu Feb 5, 2015, 03:08 PM

Sports Illustrated cover - practically porn?

Wow!! Hannah Davis, Derek Jeter's girlfriend, is wearing practically no bottom on the cover of SI swimsuit edition. Why don't they just stop the pretense and call this porn?? She has her suit pulled so far down, you can see everything but her actual genitalia.

This is a magazine that they have delivered to mailboxes, on the newsstands, and in doctors' offices. I'm amazed and wonder - how far will they go?? I could go on about objectifying women ad nauseum, but obviously, there are many women desperate to be objectified, and do it willingly, but for a mainstream magazine, this is a bridge too far, in my view. I would have hidden this from my teenage sons when I used to get them SI.

(And I wonder what Jeter's very conservative parents make of this - I have a feeling this is the death knell to this relationship since he seems to care so much what they think._

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2940598/Hannah-Davis-named-Sports-Illustrated-swimsuit-edition-s-cover-girl-year-one-magazine-s-revealing-shots-yet.html?offset=0&max=100&reply=76079723&jumpTo=comment-76079723#comment-76079723

Quote
snooper2 (22,811 posts)   Thu Feb 5, 2015, 03:09 PM

1. GREATNESS a SI thread this is just what GD needed after all the vax crack LOL

If someone posts the cover will it be alerted on?

Odds?

Quote
MineralMan (70,227 posts)   Thu Feb 5, 2015, 03:11 PM

4. Of course it will be alerted on.

And then a jury will leave it. No vulva; no hide.

It will still be objectifying women, but won't be hidden on DU.

Quote
AngryAmish (22,014 posts)   Thu Feb 5, 2015, 03:40 PM

37. Every year there is some goofy SI outrage around here.

Willy hears you, Willy don't care.

Quote
hifiguy (17,959 posts)   Thu Feb 5, 2015, 04:40 PM

69. Ain't that the truth, Rex?

I second and endorse your

Religulous psychotics are crucifying people and turning human beings into tiki torches in the Middle East and goofballs in our very own USA are trying to deny same sex couples the right to marry despite court decisions to the contrary and people get worked up about THIS.

Priorities, people, priorities.
Title: Re: primitives discuss recent edition of Sports Illustrated
Post by: Carl on February 05, 2015, 07:56:06 PM
Primitive females hate beautiful women for obvious reasons revealed via their picture threads and primitive males want the beautiful womens husbands.
Title: Re: primitives discuss recent edition of Sports Illustrated
Post by: Ptarmigan on February 05, 2015, 08:00:43 PM
Primitive females hate beautiful women for obvious reasons revealed via their picture threads and primitive males want the beautiful womens husbands.

Envy
Title: Re: primitives discuss recent edition of Sports Illustrated
Post by: diesel driver on February 05, 2015, 08:10:33 PM
Envy

The root of ALL DUmmie problems, real and imagined.
Title: Re: primitives discuss recent edition of Sports Illustrated
Post by: thundley4 on February 05, 2015, 08:19:49 PM
I don't get it. Feminazis act like their only important function in life is to have abortions. Well, it takes men willing to **** them before they can have those abortion.

If anyone needs pron to get it up,it would be those unfortunate males raped by feminazis.
Title: Re: primitives discuss recent edition of Sports Illustrated
Post by: dixierose on February 05, 2015, 08:30:15 PM
You would think that they'd be happy that a plus sized model made the issue this year.

I enjoyed the swimsuit issue when I subscribed to SI.
Title: Re: primitives discuss recent edition of Sports Illustrated
Post by: obumazombie on February 05, 2015, 09:34:47 PM
Swimsuit rape.
Title: Re: primitives discuss recent edition of Sports Illustrated
Post by: jukin on February 05, 2015, 09:41:59 PM
I don't know about any or the other guys here but the SI picture of Cheryl Tiegs (you know which one) got worn out in High school.  Porn? The Sears catalog was porn back then.

Don't even get me started on the red one piece poster of Farah Fawcet. Cold wet one piece.
Title: Re: primitives discuss recent edition of Sports Illustrated
Post by: Maxiest on February 05, 2015, 10:05:27 PM
I don't know about any or the other guys here but the SI picture of Cheryl Tiegs (you know which one) got worn out in High school.  Porn? The Sears catalog was porn back then.

Don't even get me started on the red one piece poster of Farah Fawcet. Cold wet one piece.

Yeah, good I remember when we would get the big ole Sears catalog...  The good ole days.
Title: Re: primitives discuss recent edition of Sports Illustrated
Post by: HawkHogan on February 05, 2015, 10:08:57 PM
Dummies hate free speech.

Title: Re: primitives discuss recent edition of Sports Illustrated
Post by: JohnnyReb on February 05, 2015, 10:10:02 PM
Yeah, good I remember when we would get the big ole Sears catalog...  The good ole days.
....made good use of the back pages in the outhouse. Damn them slick pages.
Title: Re: primitives discuss recent edition of Sports Illustrated
Post by: BlueStateSaint on February 06, 2015, 06:38:33 AM
You would think that they'd be happy that a plus sized model made the issue this year.

I enjoyed the swimsuit issue when I subscribed to SI.

I saw her.  She's just as hot--maybe moreso, IMHO--as the others. :fuelfire: :naughty: :hyper: :hitit:
Title: Re: primitives discuss recent edition of Sports Illustrated
Post by: njpines on February 06, 2015, 12:24:12 PM
I don't know about any or the other guys here but the SI picture of Cheryl Tiegs (you know which one) got worn out in High school.  Porn? The Sears catalog was porn back then.

Don't even get me started on the red one piece poster of Farah Fawcet. Cold wet one piece.

Heh, my brothers had the Raquel Welch poster from 1 Million BC on the wall for YEARS!  :-)

Title: Re: primitives discuss recent edition of Sports Illustrated
Post by: obumazombie on February 06, 2015, 02:44:14 PM
Heh, my brothers had the Raquel Welch poster from 1 Million BC on the wall for YEARS!  :-)

"Fussy Breeches" -Shawshank Redemption-
Title: Re: primitives discuss recent edition of Sports Illustrated
Post by: Mr Mannn on February 06, 2015, 02:47:32 PM
Dummies hate free speech.
Hi5 for the truth.

What is fascinating is this was nothing to them before Hillary started running.
Title: Re: primitives discuss recent edition of Sports Illustrated
Post by: JohnnyReb on February 06, 2015, 02:48:40 PM
HUBBA HUBBA....they also have a 6' 2" size 12 gal from down under too....she would have been my dream girl 50 years ago. :naughty: :naughty:

WTH, she still is, I am not blind yet.
Title: Re: primitives discuss recent edition of Sports Illustrated
Post by: obumazombie on February 06, 2015, 02:51:50 PM
HUBBA HUBBA....they also have a 6' 2" size 12 gal from down under too....she would have been my dream girl 50 years ago. :naughty: :naughty:

WTH, she still is, I am not blind yet.

If you were you would have to run your hands all over her to get an idea of what she "looks" like.
That would be dreadful.
Title: Re: primitives discuss recent edition of Sports Illustrated
Post by: FiddyBeowulf on February 06, 2015, 02:53:15 PM
I don't know about any or the other guys here but the SI picture of Cheryl Tiegs (you know which one) got worn out in High school.

 
It was the grade school library holy grail growing up.  :thumbs:
Title: Re: primitives discuss recent edition of Sports Illustrated
Post by: diesel driver on February 06, 2015, 07:44:04 PM
If you were you would have to run your hands all over her to get an idea of what she "looks" like.
That would be dreadful.

That was dreadful.  Don't know whether to Hi 5 or BS you.

Might have to give you one of each...   :rotf: