The Conservative Cave

Current Events => Breaking News => Topic started by: mrclose on January 27, 2015, 01:13:48 AM

Title: Bergdahl to be charged
Post by: mrclose on January 27, 2015, 01:13:48 AM
Was there ever any doubt? :whistling:

Oh .. wait. :cheersmate:


http://youtu.be/x9y44Nqofjg

Title: Re: Bergdahl to be charged
Post by: thundley4 on January 27, 2015, 01:47:11 AM
This should have been released a long time ago.
Title: Re: Bergdahl to be charged
Post by: obumazombie on January 27, 2015, 03:45:29 AM
Couldn't happen to a nicer guy.
His treachery cost us more than a few good men.
Title: Re: Bergdahl to be charged
Post by: RayRaytheSBS on January 27, 2015, 08:31:40 AM
Good. This little oxygen thief needs to suffer the consequences of his actions. Many good paratroopers died trying to rescue his sorry ass.

Sadly, I can see the DUches making him into a martyr of the big bad MIC like St. Chelsea 'I'm a traitor to my country' Manning. :banghead:
Title: Re: Bergdahl to be charged
Post by: JohnnyReb on January 27, 2015, 08:33:51 AM
Good. This little oxygen thief needs to suffer the consequences of his actions. Many good paratroopers died trying to rescue his sorry ass.

Sadly, I can see the DUches making him into a martyr of the big bad MIC like St. Chelsea 'I'm a traitor to my country' Manning. :banghead:
Manning is a P*ssy....well, he will be.
Title: Re: Bergdahl to be charged
Post by: SVPete on January 27, 2015, 09:26:09 AM
Good. This little oxygen thief needs to suffer the consequences of his actions. Many good paratroopers died trying to rescue his sorry ass.

Sadly, I can see the DUches making him into a martyr of the big bad MIC like St. Chelsea 'I'm a traitor to my country' Manning. :banghead:

Maybe "Oxygen Parasite"? That aside, unless he did/said something horribly un-PC, his "release" is one of BHO's great accomplishments - to them - so he'll be a martyr for something or other to many Libs and Progs.
Title: Re: Bergdahl to be charged
Post by: sargentodiaz on January 27, 2015, 10:59:50 AM
Obama Trying to Cover for Bergdahl

This article confirms what I've been saying for months. The army has a list of charges against him to include desertion and the White House is trying to stop it. A quick search comes up with these:

I just hope the Convening Authority has the balls to perform his duties and convene a General Courts-Martial. If they don't hang him, hope he rots the rest of his life in Leavenworth.

Attorney Has Received Charges But WH Delaying Notice To Public @ http://weaselzippers.us/212260-breaking-report-that-bergdahl-to-be-charged-with-desertion/

BERGDAHL TO BE CHARGED WITH DESERTION @ http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/01/26/report-bergdahl-to-be-charged-with-desertion/

Army General To Determine Fate Of Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl @ http://www.ibtimes.com/bowe-bergdahl-news-update-army-general-determine-fate-sgt-bowe-bergdahl-1765264

I got the original item @ http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2015/01/army-wants-to-charge-bowe-bergdahl-with.html
Title: Re: Bergdahl to be charged
Post by: Libertas on January 27, 2015, 12:02:56 PM
What about Treason?
Title: Re: Bergdahl to be charged
Post by: Zathras on January 27, 2015, 01:00:06 PM
What about Treason?

Or aiding and abetting in the deaths of the seven soldiers who were killed looking for this cowardly waste of skin?
Title: Re: Bergdahl to be charged
Post by: JohnnyReb on January 27, 2015, 03:08:01 PM
Charged? Hey, he looks run down to me....plug him into some 220 AC.
Title: Re: Bergdahl to be charged
Post by: thundley4 on January 27, 2015, 04:58:18 PM
A Pentagon spokesman said that no decision has been made.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/01/27/us-usa-bergdahl-army-idUSKBN0L02HQ20150127
Quote
Army says no decision made in Bergdahl investigation
WASHINGTON Tue Jan 27, 2015 3:05pm EST

(Reuters) - The U.S. Army on Tuesday denied that a decision had been made to bring desertion charges against Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl, who was released last year in a controversial prisoner swap after disappearing from his base in Afghanistan in 2009.

NBC News said earlier on Tuesday that Bergdahl would be charged with desertion, citing senior defense officials.

Major General Ronald Lewis, the Army's head of public affairs, said that report, and another from Fox News, were "patently false."

"To be clear there have been no actions or decisions on the Sergeant Bergdahl investigation," Lewis said in a statement.

"The investigation is still with the commanding general of U.S. Army Forces Command (General Mark Milley) who will determine appropriate action - which ranges from no further action to convening a court-martial," he added.

General Mark Milley has his orders. Keep holding the umbrella and cover Obama's ass.
Title: Re: Bergdahl to be charged
Post by: Ptarmigan on January 27, 2015, 08:14:02 PM
What about Treason?

Throw him into the Mariana Trench.
Title: Re: Bergdahl to be charged
Post by: obumazombie on January 27, 2015, 10:39:09 PM
Maybe "Oxygen Parasite"? That aside, unless he did/said something horribly un-PC, his "release" is one of BHO's great accomplishments - to them - so he'll be a martyr for something or other to many Libs and Progs.
Let's not forget that owebuma bargained with hostage takers and released 5 prisoners in exchange for Bergdahl.


edit...autocorrect.
Title: Re: Bergdahl to be charged
Post by: docstew on January 28, 2015, 08:05:36 AM
Obama Trying to Cover for Bergdahl

This article confirms what I've been saying for months. The army has a list of charges against him to include desertion and the White House is trying to stop it. A quick search comes up with these:

I just hope the Convening Authority has the balls to perform his duties and convene a General Courts-Martial. If they don't hang him, hope he rots the rest of his life in Leavenworth.

Attorney Has Received Charges But WH Delaying Notice To Public @ http://weaselzippers.us/212260-breaking-report-that-bergdahl-to-be-charged-with-desertion/

BERGDAHL TO BE CHARGED WITH DESERTION @ http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/01/26/report-bergdahl-to-be-charged-with-desertion/

Army General To Determine Fate Of Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl @ http://www.ibtimes.com/bowe-bergdahl-news-update-army-general-determine-fate-sgt-bowe-bergdahl-1765264

I got the original item @ http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2015/01/army-wants-to-charge-bowe-bergdahl-with.html

If this is true that Obama has been trying to squash this, that is unlawful command influence. I understand that he doesn't truly fall under UCMJ jurisdiction, but it is an unlawful order.
Title: Re: Bergdahl to be charged
Post by: txradioguy on January 28, 2015, 09:01:38 AM
A Pentagon spokesman said that no decision has been made.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/01/27/us-usa-bergdahl-army-idUSKBN0L02HQ20150127
General Mark Milley has his orders. Keep holding the umbrella and cover Obama's ass.

They have to do that.  Otherwise the facts come out and people learn that the Administration traded 5 terrorists for a deserter.  ANd on top of that...then let the deserters father thank Allah in the Rose Garden.
Title: Re: Bergdahl to be charged
Post by: sargentodiaz on January 29, 2015, 09:39:25 AM
The scumbag left his post in a war zone, clearly with no intention to return.

He gave information and assistance to a group the US military is fighting.

What more does Emir Barry Hussein and his minions want?

Oh yeah - I know!  :fuelfire:

It's to cover his ass!  :censored:
Title: Re: Bergdahl to be charged
Post by: JohnnyReb on January 29, 2015, 10:36:45 AM
The scumbag left his post in a war zone, clearly with no intention to return.

He gave information and assistance to a group the US military is fighting.

What more does Emir Barry Hussein and his minions want?

Oh yeah - I know!  :fuelfire:

It's to cover his ass!  :censored:

It's all alright.....the taliban  aren't terrorist.

copied from jihadwatch.org which got it from the washington times

White House deputy press secretary Eric Schultz argued during Wednesday’s briefing that the United States can negotiate prisoner swaps with Taliban members, because the Taliban is not considered a terrorist group.

ABC News reporter John Karl asked the press briefing rookie whether the Jordanian government’s trade with the Islamic State was similar to the United States trading five Taliban members for Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, the Washington Free Beacon reported.

“As you know, this was highly discussed at the time and prisoner swaps are a traditional end-of-conflict interaction that happens,” Mr. Schultz said. “As the war in Afghanistan wound down, we felt like it was the appropriate thing to do. The president’s bedrock commitment as commander in chief is to leave no man or woman behind. That’s the principle he was operating under.”

“Isn’t that what the Jordanians are operating under?” the ABC reporter argued. “The Taliban are still conducting terror attacks, so you can’t really say the war has ended as far as they’re concerned.”

Mr. Schultz explained: “I would also point out that the Taliban is an armed insurgency. [Islamic State] is a terrorist group. So we don’t make concessions to terrorist groups.”

“You don’t think the Taliban’s a terrorist group?” Mr. Karl interjected.

“I don’t think that the Taliban — the Taliban is an armed insurgency,” Mr. Schultz corrected. “This was the winding down of the war in Afghanistan, and that’s why this arrangement was dealt.”
Title: Re: Bergdahl to be charged
Post by: RayRaytheSBS on January 29, 2015, 03:05:00 PM
It's all alright.....the taliban  aren't terrorist.

copied from jihadwatch.org which got it from the washington times

White House deputy press secretary Eric Schultz argued during Wednesday’s briefing that the United States can negotiate prisoner swaps with Taliban members, because the Taliban is not considered a terrorist group.

ABC News reporter John Karl asked the press briefing rookie whether the Jordanian government’s trade with the Islamic State was similar to the United States trading five Taliban members for Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, the Washington Free Beacon reported.

“As you know, this was highly discussed at the time and prisoner swaps are a traditional end-of-conflict interaction that happens,” Mr. Schultz said. “As the war in Afghanistan wound down, we felt like it was the appropriate thing to do. The president’s bedrock commitment as commander in chief is to leave no man or woman behind. That’s the principle he was operating under.”

“Isn’t that what the Jordanians are operating under?” the ABC reporter argued. “The Taliban are still conducting terror attacks, so you can’t really say the war has ended as far as they’re concerned.”

Mr. Schultz explained: “I would also point out that the Taliban is an armed insurgency. [Islamic State] is a terrorist group. So we don’t make concessions to terrorist groups.”

“You don’t think the Taliban’s a terrorist group?” Mr. Karl interjected.

“I don’t think that the Taliban — the Taliban is an armed insurgency,” Mr. Schultz corrected. “This was the winding down of the war in Afghanistan, and that’s why this arrangement was dealt.”

Tapdance all you want, the fact still remains your boss traded 5 TERRORISTS for one traitorous deserter who cost us the lives of several paratroopers.

Words cannot describe how I feel about this insanity. This is some weapons-grade stupidity right here. And the fact that his Article 32 hearing has been postponed for political expediency is horse shit.

As if our soldiers didn't already have enough to be demoralized about, these idiots add this. :banghead:



Title: Re: Bergdahl to be charged
Post by: thundley4 on January 29, 2015, 03:52:13 PM
Josh Earnest is still pushing the line that the Taliban aren't terrorists, but ISIS is. That jackass twists and turns more than a Chinese contortionist.
Title: Re: Bergdahl to be charged
Post by: obumazombie on January 29, 2015, 04:32:49 PM
Josh Earnest is still pushing the line that the Taliban aren't terrorists, but ISIS is. That jackass twists and turns more than a Chinese contortionist.

The last I heard from owebuma was that ISIS wasn't islamic, or was it a state, even though by definition it's an inescapable part of the abbreviation.
Title: Re: Bergdahl to be charged
Post by: freedumb2003b on January 29, 2015, 06:07:00 PM
Let's not forget that owebuma bargained with hostage takers and released 5 prisoners in exchange for Bergdahl.


edit...autocorrect.

Just was listening to Savage and he said breaking news is one of those 5 has been all but confirmed as returning to be a threat to the USA.

obozo never lets a chance to screw the USA go by...
Title: Re: Bergdahl to be charged
Post by: RayRaytheSBS on January 29, 2015, 10:32:14 PM
Josh Earnest is still pushing the line that the Taliban aren't terrorists, but ISIS is. That jackass twists and turns more than a Chinese contortionist.

Hi5, and good point. I don't understand how an organization that has 'state' in its title is not a government. Possession is nine tenths of the law, and right now, they possess the land making up what they are calling 'the Islamic caliphate'.

 The Taliban will have the land in Afghanistan soon enough. Due to the enormous foreign policy ****ups our current CIC.

A little bit of inconsistency there, Mr. Earnest. How about you live up to your last name and quit pissing down America's leg and telling us it's raining.

And oh by the way, if they are a government, that means Congress can declare war on them. Which means we can turn that 'country' into a sheet of glass. Wishful thinking I know, but I can dream we'd have a president with the stones to do something like that.
Title: Re: Bergdahl to be charged
Post by: Chris_ on January 29, 2015, 10:36:41 PM
The only difference between the Taliban and ISIS is the name.  Once you get past that, they're the same underneath.
Title: Re: Bergdahl to be charged
Post by: RayRaytheSBS on January 29, 2015, 10:38:26 PM
The only difference between the Taliban and ISIS is the name.  Once you get past that, they're the same underneath.

Exactly! And they are both threats to America. The idiocy of the Washington elite is sickening. And scary.
Title: Re: Bergdahl to be charged
Post by: Ptarmigan on February 06, 2015, 01:01:30 AM
Guantanamo adviser: DOJ allowed Pentagon to bypass Congress in Taliban-Bergdahl swap
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/02/05/guantanamo-adviser-doj-allowed-pentagon-to-bypass-congress-in-taliban-bergdahl/?intcmp=latestnews

Quote
Eric Holder's Justice Department green-lighted the decision not to notify Congress -- as required by law -- before the Pentagon traded five Taliban fighters for Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl last year, the Obama administration's point person on Guantanamo Bay policy testified Thursday.

Speaking to the Senate Armed Services Committee, defense official Brian McKeon was questioned on what is still a sore spot for many members of Congress: that the administration went forward with the Taliban-Bergdahl swap without giving Congress the typically required 30-day notification.

Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., asked McKeon why Congress was not informed, "as per the statutes."

That's very wrong and illegal. Isn't this impeachable?
Title: Re: Bergdahl to be charged
Post by: obumazombie on February 06, 2015, 05:50:28 AM
Guantanamo adviser: DOJ allowed Pentagon to bypass Congress in Taliban-Bergdahl swap
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/02/05/guantanamo-adviser-doj-allowed-pentagon-to-bypass-congress-in-taliban-bergdahl/?intcmp=latestnews

That's very wrong and illegal. Isn't this impeachable?

It definitely adds to the list.
Title: Re: Bergdahl to be charged
Post by: Zathras on February 06, 2015, 12:49:54 PM
It definitely adds to the list.

Yeah, but what good does this list do when the GOP establishment are gutless cowards when it comes to upholding the laws of the land in regards to presidential malfeasance.