The Conservative Cave
Current Events => Breaking News => Topic started by: Ralph Wiggum on October 28, 2022, 08:02:23 AM
-
Pelosi spokesperson says 'assailant is in custody,' motivation for San Francisco break-in under investigatio
The husband of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Paul, has been "violently assaulted" this morning in a San Francisco home invasion, the congresswoman’s spokesperson says.
"Early this morning, an assailant broke into the Pelosi residence in San Francisco and violently assaulted Mr. Pelosi," spokesperson Drew Hammill said. "The assailant is in custody and the motivation for the attack is under investigation.
"Mr. Pelosi was taken to the hospital, where he is receiving excellent medical care and is expected to make a full recovery," Hammill added.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nancy-pelosi-husband-paul-assaulted-home-invasion-spokesman-says
:popcorn:
-
So apparently, San Fran Nancy is a 'MEAN DRUNK'???
I guess he'll know better next time... :thatsright:
-
It looks like karma has hit home. To bad nan wasn’t there too. I wonder if they will let the guy go with no bail :-)
-
So apparently, San Fran Nancy is a 'MEAN DRUNK'???
I guess he'll know better next time... :thatsright:
There'll be a warrant sworn out to depose DJT to determine his whereabouts on the night in question. There can be NO DOUBT that MAGA instigated, funded, supervised, and celebrated the attack.
Nancy Pelousy was sleeping off her latest drunk when the attack occurred. No way was she involved, except that she probably was too drunk to turn on the security system. :whatever:
-
There'll be a warrant sworn out to depose DJT to determine his whereabouts on the night in question. There can be NO DOUBT that MAGA instigated, funded, supervised, and celebrated the attack.
Nancy Pelousy was sleeping off her latest drunk when the attack occurred. No way was she involved, except that she probably was too drunk to turn on the security system. :whatever:
Just like 'Whorehouse' Harry Reid, who was attacked by his 'exercise equipment'
-
Going by the news reports I've scanned, this assault happened within the past 6 1/2 hours, so not a lot of info has been released yet. Much as DU-grade Progs want the assailant to be an uber-MAGA R, there are probably more half- and full-crazed homeless people in SF than Rs, and violence committed by some among SF's homeless has been on the increase for years.
-
The media are doubtless feverishly searching for a MAGA hat, bleach, and a noose in nearby dumpsters.
-
The media are doubtless feverishly searching for a MAGA hat, bleach, and a noose in nearby dumpsters.
:rotf:
h5
Jussie Smollett is probably on the scene helping them locate the bleach. That NASCAR driver is also on scene helping them look for the noose.
-
It's bullshit.
Utter bullshit.
I don't believe anything that POS-family says, especially now, about anything.
No motivation yet, eh? Really?
-
:rotf:
h5
Jussie Smollett is probably on the scene helping them locate the bleach. That NASCAR driver is also on scene helping them look for the noose.
SFPD and SFSD are probably rooting through the assailant's junk at his site in the encampment, searching for copies of "RW" books.
-
SFPD and SFSD are probably rooting through the assailant's junk at his site in the encampment, searching for copies of "RW" books.
Anywhere else on the planet, this would be considered SEXUAL ASSAULT and not tolerated. :puke:
-
I swear, you can't make this shit up. :lmao:
That Didn't Take Long: MSNBC Blames Paul Pelosi Attack on Trump
The facts are still coming in regarding the horrific hammer attack on Paul Pelosi, husband of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. MSNBC doesn’t need to wait for the particulars though; they already know who to blame—Donald Trump. An article by opinion columnist Ruth Ben-Ghiat, ostensibly about the assault, doesn’t even mention Mr. Pelosi in the first sentence:
“We fight like hell,” then-President Donald Trump told supporters Jan. 6, 2021. “And if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.”
What on earth does what Donald Trump said almost two years ago have to do with the crime, which is still under investigation? Ben-Ghiat writes:
On Friday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband, Paul Pelosi, was assaulted in a targeted attack. (The suspect reportedly shouted, “Where’s Nancy?” before striking Paul Pelosi with a hammer.) Meanwhile, armed men watch ballot drop boxes, election offices install bulletproof glass and poll workers undergo active-shooter trainings. To face this peril, it is essential to understand how people can be moved from partisan hostility to outright violence.
The level of journalistic irresponsibility on display here boggles the mind. This is an American news outlet, mind you. We don’t even know if this is a partisan attack; in fact, the motive has not been mentioned by the police. The perpetrator might be a former nudist jewelry maker for all we know, so not likely a card-carrying member of the GOP:
And yet here’s MSNBC’s Ben-Ghiat implying that somehow the former president caused a polarized environment which led to this violence… Or something.
We don’t know that this attack is political at all. Just like Adam Kinzinger, Gavin Newsom, and others on the left, Ben-Ghiatt wastes no time in politicizing it. She ignores Mr. Pelosi completely and goes back to waxing poetic about Trump:
Trump’s fateful speech—which directly preceded the breach of the U.S. Capitol—shows how demagogues can get people into this different state of mind. Much ink has been spilled in recent years worrying whether increasing polarization in the United States is to blame for increased likelihood of political violence. But that view misses the mark. Trump and his followers engage in something wholly different from polarization: survivalism.
As of this writing, “the motive for the attack remains under investigation.”
Ben-Ghiatt continues her diatribe, again not bothering to mention the subject of her story, Paul Pelosi, who’s in the hospital with serious injuries:
In the U.S., Jan. 6 further radicalized the Republican Party and broke taboos about the use of violence against police and lawmakers. Trump’s speech was part of a concerted effort to make armed insurrection seem not just acceptable, but also patriotic—a way to save the country from the massive fraud he claimed without evidence was perpetrated by Joe Biden.
By my count, the author mentions Paul Pelosi twice in an article that is ostensibly supposed to be about him. Instead, her entire opinion piece asserts that political tensions driven by Trump’s Jan. 6 speech led to an environment where this could happen. The author supplies exactly zero evidence, however, that a MAGA supporter is behind this.
American journalism in recent years has sunk to shocking new lows, and this drivel is just another example of malpractice. It also shows the mainstream media’s absolute obsession with Jan. 6 even though the rest of the world has moved on.
MSNBC is a joke and should be embarrassed to print stuff like this.
https://redstate.com/bobhoge/2022/10/28/that-didnt-take-long-msnbc-blames-paul-pelosi-attack-on-trump-n650595?bcid=d519b945f8a32ba161895b1c7231c16c5fa3cd48222b27fc1e013476354174f9 (https://redstate.com/bobhoge/2022/10/28/that-didnt-take-long-msnbc-blames-paul-pelosi-attack-on-trump-n650595?bcid=d519b945f8a32ba161895b1c7231c16c5fa3cd48222b27fc1e013476354174f9)
-
It's bullshit.
Utter bullshit.
I don't believe anything that POS-family says, especially now, about anything.
No motivation yet, eh? Really?
Easy, D. This story has evolved into what sounds like a gay lover's quarrel, with the underwear-clad intruder being let into the house. No 'mentally-challenged nudist' can get inside the most guarded compound in California. And SFPD said Pelosi was holding the hammer when they got there. Allegedly.
Oh-oh... Watch for members of the SFPD to 'disappear', while other members of the SFPD become 'official Pelosi explainers', seen on TV daily for the foreseeable future.
-
Easy, D. This story has evolved into what sounds like a gay lover's quarrel, with the underwear-clad intruder being let into the house. No 'mentally-challenged nudist' can get inside the most guarded compound in California. And SFPD said Pelosi was holding the hammer when they got there. Allegedly.
Oh-oh... Watch for members of the SFPD to 'disappear', while other members of the SFPD become 'official Pelosi explainers', seen on TV daily for the foreseeable future.
Well, hey, if Nancy can have her designer ice cream, why can't Paul have some dick? :lmao:
-
Easy, D. This story has evolved into what sounds like a gay lover's quarrel, with the underwear-clad intruder being let into the house. No 'mentally-challenged nudist' can get inside the most guarded compound in California. And SFPD said Pelosi was holding the hammer when they got there. Allegedly.
Oh-oh... Watch for members of the SFPD to 'disappear', while other members of the SFPD become 'official Pelosi explainers', seen on TV daily for the foreseeable future.
Wasn't glued to a TV or the web since the incident was first announced, and would occasionally check my phone yesterday afternoon and evening for the latest updates. I'd never heard of a "radical nudist" before. Knew the story would keep changing and developing as the actual facts came in. Sadly, I don't think we'll ever know.
That being said, I have no love or admiration for Paulie P. But wish him no ill will.
-
Well, hey, if Nancy can have her designer ice cream, why can't Paul have some dick? :lmao:
So is it coming out that Pauli likes to play the skin flute.?
I wonder if he was the mystery passenger the night of the accident.
Maybe the guy was playing Pauline’s flute while he was driving :-)
-
So is it coming out that Pauli likes to play the skin flute.?
I wonder if he was the mystery passenger the night of the accident.
Maybe the guy was playing Pauline’s flute while he was driving :-)
Nothing surprises me any more when it comes to politicians and their spouses. I mean, look at Slick Willie and Hillary -- now that's a match made in Heaven! :whistling:
-
All sorts of stuff coming out about Paul Pelosi, all of which is supposition and conjecture. Whether or not he was cruising gay bars and happened on this nutcase who bashed him in the head with a hammer, etc.
And the nutcase himself is all over the map.
Of course it didn't take long for the Dems to start blaming Trump and the Republicans for this crime.
Elon Musk's response to Hillary's screed was interesting.
But the interesting fact I was not aware of till tonight was that Paul Pelosi did plead guilty to his DUI back in August. Among other things, he was sentenced to 5 days in jail and financially (for him at least) a slap on the wrist to the tune of maybe $5-6K.
I had thought that this entire thing was swept under the rug and certainly it was from the LSM -- but if it was reported by regular news agencies other than LSM, I missed it.
https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/megan-fox/2022/10/30/elon-musk-questions-hillary-clinton-in-epic-takedown-over-paul-pelosis-weird-late-night-encounter-with-nudist-n1641263 (https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/megan-fox/2022/10/30/elon-musk-questions-hillary-clinton-in-epic-takedown-over-paul-pelosis-weird-late-night-encounter-with-nudist-n1641263)
-
https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/23/politics/paul-pelosi-dui-charge/index.html
https://abcnews.go.com/US/nancy-pelosis-husband-paul-pelosi-pleads-guilty-dui/story?id=88748318
https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/paul-pelosi-pleads-guilty-to-napa-county-dui-charge-sentence-includes-5-days-in-jail/
https://people.com/politics/paul-pelosi-pleads-guilty-dui-charge-sentenced-probation/
-
EXCLUSIVE: Former partner of accused Paul Pelosi attacker DePape reveals new details about suspect
https://abc7news.com/gypsy-taub-david-depape-san-francisco-pelosi-assault-who-attacked-paul-conspiracy-theory/12396990/ (https://abc7news.com/gypsy-taub-david-depape-san-francisco-pelosi-assault-who-attacked-paul-conspiracy-theory/12396990/)
AN FRANCISCO (KGO) -- The former partner of the man accused of violently attacking Speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband at their San Francisco home on Friday is revealing new details about the suspect.
"Hello this is Gypsy Taub. I am the ex-life partner of David DePape and the mother of his children," said Oxane Taub, calling from the Californian Institution For Women in Corona, California.
...
"He is mentally ill. He has been mentally ill for a long time," said Taub, who last year was found guilty on 20 counts, including the attempted abduction of a 14-year-old boy near his Berkeley high school.
...
Taub told ABC7 News that she and DePape met more than 20 years ago. Together they raised their two sons and her daughter until about seven years ago.
She described a time DePape returned home after disappearing for a year.
"He came back in very bad shape. He thought he was Jesus. He was constantly paranoid, thinking people were after him," Taub said. "And it took a good year or two to get back to, you know, being halfway normal."
...
Taub: "Well when I met him, he was only 20 years old ,and he didn't have any experience in politics, and he was very much in alignment with my views and I've always been very progressive. ...
-
https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/23/politics/paul-pelosi-dui-charge/index.html
https://abcnews.go.com/US/nancy-pelosis-husband-paul-pelosi-pleads-guilty-dui/story?id=88748318
https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/paul-pelosi-pleads-guilty-to-napa-county-dui-charge-sentence-includes-5-days-in-jail/
https://people.com/politics/paul-pelosi-pleads-guilty-dui-charge-sentenced-probation/
Brilliant, Pete! What a sleuth! :lol:
(Should tell you how little I look at the LSM)
-
I let conservabloggers and DDG root through MSM skews sources.
-
Since it seems Pauli is a swinger I wonder if nan is into some kink as well maybe a little bsdm. O-)
She seems to always appear at the gay parades :thatsright: :-)
-
Paul Pelosi attacker told investigators he planned to break House Speaker's 'kneecaps': affidavit
https://www.foxnews.com/us/paul-pelosi-attacker-told-investigators-he-planned-break-house-speakers-kneecaps-affidavit
David DePape, the 42-year-old illegal immigrant from Canada accused of breaking into the home of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi last week and attacking her husband with a hammer, allegedly wanted to hold the congresswoman hostage and threatened to break "her kneecaps" if he caught her lying, according to court documents.
San Francisco police arrived at the home and encountered Paul Pelosi, 82, and DePape struggling over a hammer. After the officers ordered them to drop the weapon, DePape allegedly seized control of it and swung it into Pelosi’s skull.
Police recovered zip ties in Pelosi’s bedroom, found glass broken at the rear of the house, tape, rope, gloves and a journal, according to the FBI affidavit.
Before Pelosi was taken to a hospital, where he underwent emergency surgery on a fractured skull, he told police from the ambulance that he had never seen DePape before and that the intruder showed up in his bedroom around 2:30 a.m. demanding to talk to "Nancy" – the House Speaker.
David DePape is an illegal immigrant from Canada.
An Immigrations and Customers Enforcement source told Fox News Monday that DePape is in the U.S. illegally after a "longtime" visa overstay.
He was born in Canada and emigrated to the U.S. about 20 years ago.
-
Since it seems Pauli is a swinger ... <snip>
:ohmy:
Old n Grumpy, I also suspect that Paul is a "swinger" and that David Depape was a gay hooker/paid escort that he (Paul) invited into the home for some kinky fun & games . How else was he (David) able to gain entrance by "breaking in" without setting off the alarm?
I also am starting to think that David was the one who broke OUT of the back window trying to get away from Paul when something went terribly wrong between the two of them.
My 2 cents worth, at least!
~ ABC
-
Rather than muddy the waters with a new thread:
Here's Why NBC News Deleted a Report on the Paul Pelosi Attack
On Friday morning's episode of NBC's TODAY Show, National Correspondent Miguel Almaguer reported new details from police on the break-in and assault of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband, Paul. The report was subsequently tweeted out by the official TODAY Show account...and then quietly deleted while a video clip on the TODAY Show's website was also subsequently disabled. Why?
Well, here's what the NBC News' Almaguer explained. "This morning, Paul Pelosi is home back at the house that became a crime scene a week ago today. NBC News learning new details about the moment police arrived," he reported. "Sources familiar with what unfolded in the Pelosi residence now revealing when officers responded to the high priority call, they were seemingly unaware they'd been called to the home of the Speaker of the House."
A bit strange that the dispatcher nor officers were aware that the call was from Pelosi or that the address they were headed for was the Speaker's residence, but not an earth-shattering revelation. But then Almaguer's report got interesting.
"After a 'knock and announce', the front door was opened by Mr. Pelosi. The 82 year old did not immediately declare an emergency or try to leave his home," Almaguer recounted. "But instead, began walking several feet back into the foyer toward the assailant and away from police. It's unclear if the 82 year old was already injured or what his mental state was, say sources," he added.
Those details reported by NBC News appear to directly contradict the sworn affidavit by FBI Special Agent Stephanie Minor. According to the affidavit signed by Minor:
At 2:31 a.m., San Francisco Police Department (“SFPD”) Officer Colby Wilmes responded to the Pelosi residence, California and knocked on the front door. When the door was opened, Pelosi and DEPAPE were both holding a hammer with one hand and DEPAPE had his other hand holding onto Pelosi’s forearm.
So, why the difference in details? And why did NBC News report the new information from their sources without noting that it was seemingly contradictory to the government agents' statement of facts, only to try to deep-six the report entirely?
Almaguer's report for the TODAY Show continued by citing court documents that state "when the [responding] officer asked what was going on, defendant smiled and said 'everything's good,' but instantaneously a struggle ensued as police clearly saw David Depape strike Paul Pelosi in the head with a hammer."
Toward the end of his report, Almaguer pointed to the obvious question: "Why Pelosi didn't try to flee or tell responding officers he was in distress is unclear."
After trying to memory-hole the report, NBC applied a strange note to the now-unplayable video's page: "The piece should not have aired because it did not meet NBC News reporting standards."
As some on Twitter pointed out, mainstream outlets reporting new information, then quickly and quietly trying to pretend they didn't report it, does not do much to help assuage those who think there's more to the story than is being explained.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/spencerbrown/2022/11/04/today-show-report-on-paul-pelosi-deleted-n2615497
-
This story … it’s weird. A lot weird. And so close to Paul almost getting off scot free for DUI. He didn’t get what he deserved, and probably wouldn’t have gotten the slap he did had it not been for Jesse Watters.
KC
-
This story … it’s weird. A lot weird. And so close to Paul almost getting off scot free for DUI. He didn’t get what he deserved, and probably wouldn’t have gotten the slap he did had it not been for Jesse Watters.
KC
And for the most part, the media doesn't care about all these key details.
IIRC, Jesse Watters was covering Paulie's still fully unexplained DUI relentlessly. And recently Governor "Nice Hair & Teeth" Newsom got pissed at Watters for "ginning up right wing hate" by even talking about it.
-
This story … it’s weird. A lot weird. And so close to Paul almost getting off scot free for DUI. He didn’t get what he deserved, and probably wouldn’t have gotten the slap he did had it not been for Jesse Watters.
KC
If the story is at all "weird" it means corruption. Pure and simple. Otherwise, why the weirdness?
-
If the story is at all "weird" it means corruption. Pure and simple. Otherwise, why the weirdness?
Probably because the authorities are very cryptic and ambiguous with their official statements.
If it were a simple home invasion, it would have been a cut & dry story. But with all the obfuscation, something weird is afoot.
-
Probably because the authorities are very cryptic and ambiguous with their official statements.
If it were a simple home invasion, it would have been a cut & dry story. But with all the obfuscation, something weird is afoot.
Agreed. But with the circling of the wagons and the obfuscation for an otherwise straightforward story, I ain't convinced that Mr. Pelosi wasn't doing "things" that don't place his wife in a political quandary.
I don't give a damn what he does with his boyfriends. But I do give a damn what his wife does with truthful information. Therefore, I firmly believe she and her team are doing their best to spin the story to make it look like Mr. Pelosi was the victim when he was most likely the sperm recipient, done completely at his request.
What kind of 82-year-old man is entertaining guests at 2:30 AM?
-
Probably because the authorities are very cryptic and ambiguous with their official statements.
If it were a simple home invasion, it would have been a cut & dry story. But with all the obfuscation, something weird is afoot.
"But with all the obfuscation, something weird is afoot."
Now that I know what "on the down low" means ...
Is no longer "weird" to me. Is nothing but a cover-up for both the Pelosis!
-
Here's Why NBC News Deleted a Report on the Paul Pelosi Attack
More skulduggery:
On Friday morning's episode of NBC's TODAY Show, National Correspondent Miguel Almaguer reported new details from police on the break-in and assault of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband, Paul. The report was subsequently tweeted out by the official TODAY Show account...and then quietly deleted while a video clip on the TODAY Show's website was also subsequently disabled. Why?
Well, here's what the NBC News' Almaguer explained. "This morning, Paul Pelosi is home back at the house that became a crime scene a week ago today. NBC News learning new details about the moment police arrived," he reported. "Sources familiar with what unfolded in the Pelosi residence now revealing when officers responded to the high priority call, they were seemingly unaware they'd been called to the home of the Speaker of the House."
A bit strange that the dispatcher nor officers were aware that the call was from Pelosi or that the address they were headed for was the Speaker's residence, but not an earth-shattering revelation. But then Almaguer's report got interesting.
"After a 'knock and announce', the front door was opened by Mr. Pelosi. The 82 year old did not immediately declare an emergency or try to leave his home," Almaguer recounted. "But instead, began walking several feet back into the foyer toward the assailant and away from police. It's unclear if the 82 year old was already injured or what his mental state was, say sources," he added.
Those details reported by NBC News appear to directly contradict the sworn affidavit by FBI Special Agent Stephanie Minor. According to the affidavit signed by Minor:
At 2:31 a.m., San Francisco Police Department (“SFPD”) Officer Colby Wilmes responded to the Pelosi residence, California and knocked on the front door. When the door was opened, Pelosi and DEPAPE were both holding a hammer with one hand and DEPAPE had his other hand holding onto Pelosi’s forearm.
So, why the difference in details? And why did NBC News report the new information from their sources without noting that it was seemingly contradictory to the government agents' statement of facts, only to try to deep-six the report entirely?
Almaguer's report for the TODAY Show continued by citing court documents that state "when the [responding] officer asked what was going on, defendant smiled and said 'everything's good,' but instantaneously a struggle ensued as police clearly saw David Depape strike Paul Pelosi in the head with a hammer."
Toward the end of his report, Almaguer pointed to the obvious question: "Why Pelosi didn't try to flee or tell responding officers he was in distress is unclear."
Here's the full clip that aired Friday morning and was since removed by NBC News:
(Twitter crap)
After trying to memory-hole the report, NBC applied a strange note to the now-unplayable video's page: "The piece should not have aired because it did not meet NBC News reporting standards."
As some on Twitter pointed out, mainstream outlets reporting new information, then quickly and quietly trying to pretend they didn't report it, does not do much to help assuage those who think there's more to the story than is being explained.
(more Twitter crap)
Authorities still say they will not release body-worn camera footage from the responding officers — which would quickly clear up the disparity between what Almaguer reported and what the FBI affidavit stated — nor the 911 call Pelosi placed. The U.S. Capitol Police have also said they are not planning to release footage their cameras recorded the night of the break-in.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/spencerbrown/2022/11/04/today-show-report-on-paul-pelosi-deleted-n2615497?recip=29140120 (https://townhall.com/tipsheet/spencerbrown/2022/11/04/today-show-report-on-paul-pelosi-deleted-n2615497?recip=29140120)
-
What kind of 82-year-old man is entertaining guests at 2:30 AM?
Ha Ha! ... At 2:30 Am?
Only the sandman & the urgent-need- to get -up -to -piddle fairy I presume! :-)
-
San Francisco DA Vows to Limit Access to Paul Pelosi Attack Evidence ‘As Much as Possible’
For you unfortunates who live in Commiefornia, how does this grab ya? Why would body camera footage be so troubling as to keep it from the public? :whatever:
Well, I think we know the answer to that question. And Nancy doesn't even want the question to be asked, much less answered.
The San Francisco prosecutor investigating the man accused of hitting Paul Pelosi with a hammer last week is vowing to limit the public’s access to evidence surrounding the case.
In an interview with CNN on Wednesday, San Francisco District Attorney Brooke Jenkins said a “very limited number of family members” will be able to access evidence in the case, including police body-camera footage and the 911 call. Pelosi is the longtime husband of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).
“For us, revealing that evidence through the media is just not what we think is appropriate,” Jenkins told the network on Thursday. “We want to make sure that this individual is held accountable for these egregious acts,” she also said. “For us, we’re going to make sure that we limit the evidence as much as possible in order to get that done.”
The evidence includes footage of the alleged hammer attack by David DePape, 42, that sent Paul Pelosi to the hospital for about six days. He was released on Thursday evening, according to the House speaker’s office.
DePape is accused of breaking into the Pelosi home when she wasn’t there before he approached Paul Pelosi while he was sleeping and asked him where his wife was, according to court documents. Later, he allegedly told investigators that he wanted to break Speaker Pelosi’s kneecaps.
In the incident, DePape allowed Pelosi to use the bathroom, where he called the police. When officers arrived, the court papers said, both DePape and Pelosi had their hand on the same hammer. They told the suspect to drop the hammer, and he swung it at Pelosi’s head, officials said.
Jenkins told CNN that DePape has been cooperative with investigators and “submitted to a lengthy interview” before he obtained a lawyer.
“What was going on in his mind as to why he did that, I can’t speak to that. But what is very clear to me from viewing that body worn camera is he tried to kill Mr. Pelosi,” San Francisco police chief Bill Scott told reporters this week.
Questions have emerged about why Pelosi’s home had no security and why Capitol Police were not monitoring cameras at the home amid Democrats’ politically charged claims that extremists are threatening U.S. institutions. Speaker Pelosi is second in line to the presidency after Vice President Kamala Harris.
On Wednesday, the Capitol Police issued a statement saying that it will carry out an internal review of its security protocols following the attack. It said that its Command Center has “access to roughly 1,800 cameras” and said there are cameras “used to actively monitor the Speaker’s San Francisco residence around the clock when she is there.”
Epoch Times (https://www.theepochtimes.com/san-francisco-da-vows-to-limit-access-to-paul-pelosi-attack-evidence-as-much-as-possible_4841988.html?src_src=News&src_cmp=breaking-2022-11-04-3&est=oyKDt69lqZsG8RPEG6S0hFchIG1fy8mTWAzgyG5XMPYUeEJTMeGICjKs%2FtcFehzfCZI%3D)
-
San Francisco DA Vows to Limit Access to Paul Pelosi Attack Evidence ‘As Much as Possible’
For you unfortunates who live in Commiefornia, how does this grab ya? Why would body camera footage be so troubling as to keep it from the public? :whatever:
Well, I think we know the answer to that question. And Nancy doesn't even want the question to be asked, much less answered.
" And Nancy doesn't even want the question to be asked, much less answered."
100% correct Euph! :cheersmate:
Wonder why, huh? :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
And outta here for the night! :bolt:
Night all! ~ ABC
-
Ha Ha! ... At 2:30 Am?
Only the sandman & the urgent-need- to get -up -to -piddle fairy I presume! :-)
The get-up-to-piddle thing is one I am reasonably familiar with. :lmao: But one thing is for sure -- I don't wrestle with some guy in my house over a hammer and I don't have the cops knocking at my door at that hour either. :rofl:
-
The get-up-to-piddle thing is one I am reasonably familiar with. :lmao: But one thing is for sure -- I don't wrestle with some guy in my house over a hammer and I don't have the cops knocking at my door at that hour either. :rofl:
You mean you're not a retired mob assassin mourning the recent loss of your wife to cancer??? :confused:
(https://64.media.tumblr.com/48205af14b9e993dd77408d8ead4c547/tumblr_o52k40ITkK1ryvclko2_250.gif)
-
The get-up-to-piddle thing is one I am reasonably familiar with. :lmao: But one thing is for sure -- I don't wrestle with some guy in my house over a hammer and I don't have the cops knocking at my door at that hour either. :rofl:
Yeah, that 3 a.m. thing is starting to get annoying as I've entered my 50's. :rofl:
I've also never been wearing only tighty whities with a radical nudist at 2:30 in the morning. I prefer the company of women. But hey, consenting adults can do whatever they want to do.
We're never going to hear the whole story. The biggest power of media and the left is the power to suppress information. Until Paulie P. got in that still unexplained DUI wreck, I'd never heard his name nor cared who Bela Pelosi's husband was.
-
Five Lingering Questions About The Bizarre Paul Pelosi Attack
https://quoththeraven.substack.com/p/five-lingering-questions-about-the
The first question we are left to wonder is the obvious: what was DePape’s true motivation?
Both sides in the media have painted the assailant in different lights. For example, Politico wrote that “he subscribed to the discredited narrative that the 2020 presidential election was illegitimate and espoused a range of bigoted and radical beliefs. He expressed anti-Semitic views and appeared to embrace the QAnon movement, which posits a secret cabal of pedophiles has been protected by people in power.”
But then there was this NY Post opinion piece (and Substack post) by Michael Shellenberger, which noted that “DePape lived with a notorious local nudist in a Berkeley home, complete with a Black Lives Matter sign in the window and an LGBT rainbow flag, emblazoned with a marijuana symbol, hanging from a tree”.
The second question is: who is the unidentified person that let law enforcement into the home the morning of the break-in?
Politico reported early this weekend that there was apparently a third person in the home at the time of the incident:
David DePape forced his way into the home through a back entrance, Scott said. Officers arrived at the house, knocked on the front door and were let inside by an unknown person. They discovered DePape and Pelosi struggling for a hammer, and after they instructed them to drop the weapon, Scott said, DePape took the hammer and “violently attacked” Pelosi.
Possible explanation: Was it a housekeeper? Live-in staff? Body cam footage should make this clear.
-
Sorry Ptarmigan, didn't have time to read your link this morning.
As I posted before, somewhere in here ... I will always believe (since I now know what "on the down low"means) that Paul P was up to his eyebrows :-) and was caught in the middle of engaging in his kinky fun & games at 2:30 in the morning! Gross!!!
-
I've also never been wearing only tighty whities with a radical nudist at 2:30 in the morning.
Looking at the photo of that cretin, I find it amazing that any self-respecting nudist colony would allow him through the gates. I mean hell -- even nudist colonies have standards, right? :p
-
Looking at the photo of that cretin, I find it amazing that any self-respecting nudist colony would allow him through the gates. I mean hell -- even nudist colonies have standards, right? :p
What exactly the attraction to "nudism" is I do not know ...
But for some reason I very much doubt it lines up with Mr. Pelosi's lifestyle! (puke, puke!)_
This David guy, was no doubt a paid participant in the whole thing, 'til it went wrong for some reason.
IMO once again! ~ ABC
-
Mercy! Have had enough of this subject! I have I have!
Would much rather have come in here to remind folks to turn their clocks back tomorrow night! :-)
-
Mercy! Have had enough of this subject! I have I have!
Would much rather have come in here to remind folks to turn their clocks back tomorrow night! :-)
Whoa! DST caught me napping! Thanks for the reminder, ABC!
-
Whoa! DST caught me napping! Thanks for the reminder, ABC!
Oops! Should have said "FOR tomorrow" NOT tomorrow night! (blush)
Oh well, Euph ... at least you now know on this Sunday morning, the 6th. of November, that it is one hour earlier than it was yesterday morning! :-)
Hell's bells! For heaven's sake, why do we have to keep changing the hour? ...
Stick to one time!!! ... I know, I know, at one time in the past, there was a reason for doing so, but no longer ...
And I don't give a hang which one is chosen, we as human beings will get used to it!!! We will, we will!
-
Oops! Should have said "FOR tomorrow" NOT tomorrow night! (blush)
Oh well, Euph ... at least you now know on this Sunday morning, the 6th. of November, that it is one hour earlier than it was yesterday morning! :-)
Hell's bells! Ffor heaven's sake, why do we have to keep changing the hour? ...
Stick to one time!!! ... I know, I know, at one time in the past, there was a reason for doing so, but no longer ...
And I don't give a hang which one is chosen, we as human beings will get used to it!!! We will, we will!
Leave it to Homer Simpson to explain your thoughts:
https://youtu.be/QUruzbsxYZY
-
Leave it to Homer Simpson to explain your thoughts:
https://youtu.be/QUruzbsxYZY
Ha! Ha! :cheersmate:
Which of course means +1 for you Ralphie, (you thankfully, heterosexual guy, you !) ... and yes I do read & remember most of the posts in here!
~ ABC
-
And now will get outta here once again & go over to the "Crying in my beer" thread to continue my complaining about the time change! I shall, I shall!
So ... all may continue posting about disgusting Mr. Pelosi in this thread if you wish! :-)
~ ABC