The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: CC27 on April 10, 2024, 07:49:28 AM
-
Irish_Dem (46,108 posts)
Men would never tolerate it.
Men would never tolerate restrictions on their sexuality or related medical care.
Men would never tolerate being sent to a hospital parking lot to die.
Men would never tolerate being sent to prison for health care decisions.
Men would never tolerate their doctors being sent to prison for proving medical care to males.
Is this why the GOP targets only females when it comes to reproductive issues.
Men are half the reproductive equation, but women are the targets.
Irish_Dem (46,108 posts)
3. Insurrection.
What would happen if men's viagra was taken away.
Or masturbation meant a jail sentence?
WhiskeyGrinder (22,270 posts)
7. But men *do* tolerate those things.
Restrictions on gay sexuality took years to turn back, and only because small groups of vocal, revolutionary fringes protested. Mainstream gay men -- white, well off, possibly closeted or down low -- could afford to not have to fight for it. They definitely tolerated it.
Many men are currently tolerating -- and in fact driving the push for -- restricting IVF care.
Are men as a whole tolerating the current moves on abortion and related reproductive care?
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100218849167
They are all worked up over this AZ ruling
-
In the real world, laws forbidding abortion as far back as the 1800s Arizona law (and probably even earlier) included saving the life of the mother as an exception.
In the real word, a Catholic hospital that will not abort a baby for being inconvenient to the mother will readily perform an abortion in the case of an ectopic pregnancy.
Very few abortions performed in the US are true "health care decisions"!
If women not being able to kill inconvenient babies is a "restriction on their sexuality", then being legally forced to provide 18-25 years of support for an inconvenient baby instead of paying half the cost of an abortion is a restriction on men's sexuality.
Irish_Dem (46,108 posts)
3. Insurrection.
What would happen if men's viagra was taken away.
Or masturbation meant a jail sentence?
1. Viagra and masturbation do not kill a human being. Abortion does. There is no analogy between withholding Viagra and forbidding abortion.
2. Thank you for demonstrating that Dems screaming Insurrection! are screaming meaningless demonization.
-
No one is messing with women’s sexuality. All you need to do is use birth control responsibly, and then you can be the biggest slut in all the land. :thatsright:
-
Missing in every leftist diatribe in which rape is not a part, is identifying who is forcing these women to have unprotected sex.
Accountability and responsibility do not exist with modern women and leftists, except when they talk about others who are not modern women or leftists.
-
Irish_Dem (46,108 posts)
Men would never tolerate it.
Men would never tolerate restrictions on their sexuality or related medical care.
Men would never tolerate being sent to a hospital parking lot to die.
Men would never tolerate being sent to prison for health care decisions.
Men would never tolerate their doctors being sent to prison for proving medical care to males.
Is this why the GOP targets only females when it comes to reproductive issues.
Men are half the reproductive equation, but women are the targets.
What does it think about "gender affirming care" for children?
-
WOW! Not have abortion as your preferred form of birth control really interferes with the DUmmies night life.
-
What does it think about "gender affirming care" for children?
Or "toxic masculinity"? Y'all neutered DUmp flies tolerate that just fine.
-
In the real world, laws forbidding abortion as far back as the 1800s Arizona law (and probably even earlier) included saving the life of the mother as an exception.
In the real word, a Catholic hospital that will not abort a baby for being inconvenient to the mother will readily perform an abortion in the case of an ectopic pregnancy.
Very few abortions performed in the US are true "health care decisions"!
If women not being able to kill inconvenient babies is a "restriction on their sexuality", then being legally forced to provide 18-25 years of support for an inconvenient baby instead of paying half the cost of an abortion is a restriction on men's sexuality.
1. Viagra and masturbation do not kill a human being. Abortion does. There is no analogy between withholding Viagra and forbidding abortion.
2. Thank you for demonstrating that Dems screaming Insurrection! are screaming meaningless demonization.
What about some court forcing a man to pay child support for kids that are not theirs or in the case of the men that donate their sperm to some woman only to find out they might be on the hook for child support. How is that fair?