VIDEO: Justin Trudeau Channels His Inner Fidel in Crazed Ukraine War Speech

[pjcomix]

DADA!!! Are you PROUD of your little SONNY BOY now?

Watch as Justin Trudeau channels his inner Fidel Castro in a CRAZED speech supporting the continuation of the bloody Ukraine War. He comes across as every bit the authoritarian as his REAL FATHER. Fortunately, as you can see, many Canadians are now reacting against this growing authoritarianism by Castro's son which he also demonstrated by clamping down on freedoms in his insane response the the 2022 Freedom Convoy in which he went so far as to order bank accounts to be frozen of those who dared to disagree with Little Fidel.

DADA!!! Your little SONNY BOY has become YOU at last!

https://rumble.com/v3kdz9m-justin-trudeau-channels-his-inner-fidel-in-crazed-ukraine-war-speech.html

[Old n Grumpy]

Unless there’s a massive spontaneous uprising nothing will change. If there are small protests he will just clamp down on the protesters and take away more of their freedoms. Power hungry politicians never admit they were wrong and never back down or give up any of their power, they only grab more.

[Ptarmigan]

Zelenskyy, Trudeau Honor Actual 3rd Reich Nazi With Standing Ovation
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/zelenskyy-trudeau-honor-actual-3rd-reich-nazi-standing-ovation

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelenskyy - who commands a battalion of neo-Nazis - honored an actual WWII Nazi with a standing ovation on Friday.



Yaroslav Hunka, 98, fought in a Third Reich military formation accused of war crimes.

On Friday, he was honored during a session of Canadian parliament in which Zelenskyy addressed the lawmakers to thank them for their support since Russia invaded Ukraine, saying that Canada has always been on "the bright side of history."

Hunka stood for standing ovation and saluted, according to Canadian television.

A 98-year old was given standing ovation by the Canadian parliament during Zelensky's speech.

He was hailed as a hero for fighting against the Russians.

Yaroslav Hunk fought for the 14th division of the Waffen SS. pic.twitter.com/1J2lNywBM5

— UNN (@UnityNewsNet) September 24, 2023

According to the Associated Press, Hunka "fought with the First Ukrainian Division in World War II before later immigrating to Canada," another name for the 14th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS, the Nazi party's military wing, also known as the SS Galichina.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelensky celebrated and honored Yaroslav Hunk. Hunk is an actual Waffen-SS from World War II.

[SVPete]

  Hunka is 98. In 2000 he was 75 ... In 1945 he was 20 ... IOW, he was a private or corporal, not someone with command authority.

  This division was formed with the ideal of some sort of independence for Ukraine, not Hitler's master race ideal. Ukrainian nationalism was a cause well before Hitler was born. Both the Czars and Stalin fanned the flames of this ideal. Speaking of Stalin ...

  Ever heard of the Holodomor? It was a famine engineered by Stalin in which 5 or 10 million Ukrainians were starved to death. Why in Hades would Ukrainians owe any loyalty to Stalin?

  The First Ukrainian Division was partly wiped out in the Brody Pocket (Eastern Front). The SS reconstituted the division using forced conscripts. That Hunka survived the war suggests that he was not in the Brody Pocket, but was one of the conscripts.

  As the war was grinding to a close, the division was fighting in Austria. In March 1945 it became part of the independent Ukrainian National Army. The division surrendered in Austria to US and British forces. Several thousand emigrated to the UK and Canada (had they been sent to Stalin they would have died in the Gulags, if they got that far.

Isn't it "funny" how an outrage becomes a fauxrage if you bother to do a little Math and a little more research? The war on the Eastern Front was very different from the West. To Ukrainians, the Germans became enslavers who replaced their previous enslaver Stalin. And the defeat of the Germans meant further slavery under Stalin.

Fast-forwarding into the 21st Century, the Nazis are a thing of two or three generations ago. Russian oppression, OTOH, continued until 1991, and then in 2014, the Russians invaded Crimea. Russian oppression made a partial comeback, and in 2022 Putin decided to just reconquer Ukraine. The insignia that have some Westerners making silly accusations of neo-Nazism are simply Ukrainian mockery of the Russians who want to enslave them.

[Ptarmigan]

Hunka is 98. In 2000 he was 75 ... In 1945 he was 20 ... IOW, he was a private or corporal, not someone with command authority.

  This division was formed with the ideal of some sort of independence for Ukraine, not Hitler's master race ideal. Ukrainian nationalism was a cause well before Hitler was born. Both the Czars and Stalin fanned the flames of this ideal. Speaking of Stalin ...

  Ever heard of the Holodomor? It was a famine engineered by Stalin in which 5 or 10 million Ukrainians were starved to death. Why in Hades would Ukrainians owe any loyalty to Stalin?

  The First Ukrainian Division was partly wiped out in the Brody Pocket (Eastern Front). The SS reconstituted the division using forced conscripts. That Hunka survived the war suggests that he was not in the Brody Pocket, but was one of the conscripts.

  As the war was grinding to a close, the division was fighting in Austria. In March 1945 it became part of the independent Ukrainian National Army. The division surrendered in Austria to US and British forces. Several thousand emigrated to the UK and Canada (had they been sent to Stalin they would have died in the Gulags, if they got that far.

Isn't it "funny" how an outrage becomes a fauxrage if you bother to do a little Math and a little more research? The war on the Eastern Front was very different from the West. To Ukrainians, the Germans became enslavers who replaced their previous enslaver Stalin. And the defeat of the Germans meant further slavery under Stalin.

Fast-forwarding into the 21st Century, the Nazis are a thing of two or three generations ago. Russian oppression, OTOH, continued until 1991, and then in 2014, the Russians invaded Crimea. Russian oppression made a partial comeback, and in 2022 Putin decided to just reconquer Ukraine. The insignia that have some Westerners making silly accusations of neo-Nazism are simply Ukrainian mockery of the Russians who want to enslave them.

Holodomor is genocide. Ukraine was in a bad position no matter how one spins it during World War II and after.

What I do not get is leftists like to accuse anyone they disagree with being a Nazis or white supremacist. The left has a thing for Joseph Stalin. The leftist New York Times even downplayed Holodomor.

Stalin is a monster right next to Adolf Hitler, Mao Zedong, Hideki Tojo, and Pol Pot.

[DefiantSix]

...Stalin is a monster right next to Adolf Hitler, Mao Zedong, Hideki Tojo, and Pol Pot.

Stalin and Mao were monsters who make all the others on your list look like Girl Scouts selling cookies for summer camp. It's not even a close second behind those two.

[Ptarmigan]

Stalin and Mao were monsters who make all the others on your list look like Girl Scouts selling cookies for summer camp. It's not even a close second behind those two.

Pol Pot killed a third of Cambodians. That is really atrocious. Stalin and Mao are just monsters in their own class.

[SVPete]

Holodomor is genocide. Ukraine was in a bad position no matter how one spins it during World War II and after.

What I do not get is leftists like to accuse anyone they disagree with being a Nazis or white supremacist. The left has a thing for Joseph Stalin. The leftist New York Times even downplayed Holodomor.

Stalin is a monster right next to Adolf Hitler, Mao Zedong, Hideki Tojo, and Pol Pot.

It may be dated, because the USSR had not yet fallen, but Robert Conquest's Harvest of Sorrow is a horrifying introduction to the Holodomor. Libs and Progs who have heard of their work hate Conquest and Solzhenitsyn because of what they exposed, all the more because they were correct before Libs and Progs were shamed into admitting what Stalin had done (or into ignoring it).

Ukraine was in an ugly position in WW2. It had been conquered/grafted onto the Russian Empire, mostly during the 18th Century (Crimea, ca. 1800). In their "wisdom", the Czars had worked to suppress the Ukrainian language and culture (as did Soviet leaders throughout the 20th Century). After Lenin and Stalin solidified their empire (failing to conquer Poland in that process), Stalin made starving (by confiscating food) Ukraine part of his collectivization and anti-Kulak efforts.

This starvation was the Holodomor. Conquest estimates, IIRC, that 10 million dies. Other estimates I've seen are in the 5 million range. The NYT's Walter Duranty flakked for Stalin and denied the mass starvation that was happening and Stalin's other brutalities. The NYT received - and to this date has never returned - a Pulitzer Prize for Duranty's lying propaganda.

In terms of innocent humans killed, Stalin is second to Mao and ahead of Hitler, who is third worst. OTOH, in terms of percentage of available victims, Pol Pot may be worst, because he had only the population of Cambodia from which to pick his victims.

That was the context in Ukraine when Hitler invaded the USSR. It may seem bizarre to us, in hindsight, but at first Hitler was viewed by many Ukrainians as a liberator. They had no experience with and little knowledge of Hitler's Master Race garbage. They learned they were wrong, the hard way. Hitler viewed Slavs as inferiors, and Ukrainians were/are Slavic. A split came about between those who realized that Stalin was the Devil they would have in the future and those who thought some degree of Ukrainian independence could be eked out of the fight between Hitler and Stalin. History proved the former correct, as to who would win and Stalin's character.

"What I do not get is leftists like to accuse anyone they disagree with being a Nazis or white supremacist." At present, it is some conservatives who are claiming that Ukraine is neo-Nazis. That was the point of ZeroHedge's post, to smear Zelensky with a nearly 100YO former private or corporal who probably was a conscript. When one wants to believe that Ukraine is neo-Nazis, using a (probable) conscript of 1944 or 1945 who has been living in Canada since 1947 or 1948 being honored by Canada in 2023 to "prove" that Ukraine is neo-Nazis makes sense.

[Ptarmigan]

It may be dated, because the USSR had not yet fallen, but Robert Conquest's Harvest of Sorrow is a horrifying introduction to the Holodomor. Libs and Progs who have heard of their work hate Conquest and Solzhenitsyn because of what they exposed, all the more because they were correct before Libs and Progs were shamed into admitting what Stalin had done (or into ignoring it).

Ukraine was in an ugly position in WW2. It had been conquered/grafted onto the Russian Empire, mostly during the 18th Century (Crimea, ca. 1800). In their "wisdom", the Czars had worked to suppress the Ukrainian language and culture (as did Soviet leaders throughout the 20th Century). After Lenin and Stalin solidified their empire (failing to conquer Poland in that process), Stalin made starving (by confiscating food) Ukraine part of his collectivization and anti-Kulak efforts.

This starvation was the Holodomor. Conquest estimates, IIRC, that 10 million dies. Other estimates I've seen are in the 5 million range. The NYT's Walter Duranty flakked for Stalin and denied the mass starvation that was happening and Stalin's other brutalities. The NYT received - and to this date has never returned - a Pulitzer Prize for Duranty's lying propaganda.

In terms of innocent humans killed, Stalin is second to Mao and ahead of Hitler, who is third worst. OTOH, in terms of percentage of available victims, Pol Pot may be worst, because he had only the population of Cambodia from which to pick his victims.

That was the context in Ukraine when Hitler invaded the USSR. It may seem bizarre to us, in hindsight, but at first Hitler was viewed by many Ukrainians as a liberator. They had no experience with and little knowledge of Hitler's Master Race garbage. They learned they were wrong, the hard way. Hitler viewed Slavs as inferiors, and Ukrainians were/are Slavic. A split came about between those who realized that Stalin was the Devil they would have in the future and those who thought some degree of Ukrainian independence could be eked out of the fight between Hitler and Stalin. History proved the former correct, as to who would win and Stalin's character.

"What I do not get is leftists like to accuse anyone they disagree with being a Nazis or white supremacist." At present, it is some conservatives who are claiming that Ukraine is neo-Nazis. That was the point of ZeroHedge's post, to smear Zelensky with a nearly 100YO former private or corporal who probably was a conscript. When one wants to believe that Ukraine is neo-Nazis, using a (probable) conscript of 1944 or 1945 who has been living in Canada since 1947 or 1948 being honored by Canada in 2023 to "prove" that Ukraine is neo-Nazis makes sense.

Holodomor is genocide, along with the Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution. There was also famine in Kazakhstan at the same time with Ukraine.

As for the New York Times not giving back the Pulitzer Prize, I think that prize is tainted. I avoid New York Times because of it.

I read about what happened in the Killing Fields of Khmer Rouge. Makes you shudder.

The whole Ukraine War is just terrible all around.