The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Tucker on July 03, 2011, 07:01:49 AM

Title: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: Tucker on July 03, 2011, 07:01:49 AM
Why do I think DemoTex is a phony vet? He claims to be a forest ranger. A few months back, he was transferred to another duty station and because he was inexperienced, he wanted to know what kind of gun to buy for bear/wild animal protection while in the sticks.

His avatar is a Vietnam Service Medal.

Quote
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Sat Jul-02-11 10:50 PM
Original message
You will never - in a thousand years - guess the cause of our big fire today.
   
We have a big fire burning at Hole-In-The-Ground (a Maar volcano to
the southwest of me). We (the US Forest Service) have 12 units on the fire, including a
helicopter for bucket drops. Additionally, there are firefighters from the BLM, the Oregon Dept.
of Forestry, and a rural VFD.

The first fire crews to arrive at the fire witnessed ATVs speeding away
from the scene. A fire investigator intercepted those ATVers at their camp,
where they were rapidly packing to leave. He confronted the people and
they admitted to starting the fire. How did they start the fire (this is the absolutely
unbelievable part)? THEY WERE FIRING A 50-CAL WEAPON INTO
HOLE-IN-THE-GROUND! A 50-CAL! They had the weapon with them at their
camp (I don't yet know if it was a single-shot, automatic, or machine
gun).

"What is a 50-caliber?" you ask. It is basically what the VC and NVA
used to shoot down helicopters and low-flying airplanes in Vietnam.
  A
50-cal round can be several combinations of armor-piercing, explosive,
and/or incendiary (and, probably others).

What are idiots like this doing in our National Forest shooting an
anti-aircraft weapon? The only thing as stupid as setting the fire was
their admission - without an attorney present - that they set it. They
are now in a heap-o trouble, facing federal and state charges (and
liable for the entire cost of the firefighting operation).

[several pictures of smoke]

Wind changes everything​," wildland firefighte​rs say. A late afternoon windshift (from southeast to northwest)
and velocity increase played havoc with the Hole-In-Th​e-Ground fire. The fire jumped the fire line and the
firefighte​rs had to pull back. The wind made helicopter bucket drops impossible​.


The VC/NVA used 12/7mm. American forces used the 50 BMG. It seems like he should know this.

Quote
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Sat Jul-02-11 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because the ****ing NRA believes that any asshole should be able to
   
shoot any ****ing weapon they want to where ever they ****ing want to.

**** them.

obama signed the law allowing firearms in National Forests. Take it up with him.

Quote
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Sat Jul-02-11 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. But, but, but
   
Johm McCain told me illegal aliens were to blame! Not Elmer Fudds with 50-cals!

Different state.

Quote
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Sat Jul-02-11 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. The 50 cal is a bad assed weapon. I got to shoot one in the
   
Army. That was during basic. What the **** were they doing bringing that thing to a park? Stupid

(http://www.olive-drab.com/images/firearms_mg_m2.jpg)

Barrett makes several models that can be carried. The Ma Deuce is not a plinking weapon.

Quote
The Big Vetolski (56 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Sat Jul-02-11 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Thanks for posting the picture. Maybe it will do something to
   
dispel the notion that .50 cals are just anti-aircraft weapons. They're also very potent anti-personnel and, for that matter, anti-light vehicle weapons as well. The bullets are about 6 inches long. One of the most ridiculous depictions of their use was in "Rambo," where Sylvester Stallone was firing one from his hip. Absurd! The recoil would knock any human being on his ass, which is why .50 cals are always mounted on something.

I got to shoot one once, too, in the Navy, at the Pacific Ocean. I'd never dream of firing one in a park. That's just nuts. That violates even the NRA's safety standards.

Another clueless DUmmy. Rambo used a M60, which is a 30 cal.

Quote
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Sat Jul-02-11 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. I just used anti-aircraft as an example (because of my intimate experience with 12.7mm)
   
Had the 12.7mm (50-cal) that ripped through my wing in 1970 exploded, as it was designed to do, I probably would not be posting here tonight. I was a lucky-ducky.

Whoops. He's a combat pilot. Who'd thunk it.

Quote
NickB79 (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Sat Jul-02-11 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. The chance they were firing a gun even remotely like your pic is slim
   
Unless they're freaking millionaires, as a legally owned gun like that would retail for close to 6 figures on the civilian market.

Dirty freeper troll.

Quote
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Sat Jul-02-11 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
27. You can thank the NRA and their lackeys in the gungeon for legalizing that. nt

The gungeon is a section on the island that is populated by pro gun democrats(moles). Nice slam. Someone should alert Der Skimmer.

Quote
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Sat Jul-02-11 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. Truth be told, I broke down and bought a carbine for my wilderness situation.
   
I did not want to, but I was just too worried about Nick and the mountain lions out here (I spotted one on this butte in late May). I got a Marlin lever-action 44MAG short-barreled carbine. I hate the mofo. And, now that I have it, I feel that I really don't need it. But, as long as I'm doing these wilderness fire seasons, I'll keep it. Close by.

Quote
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Sun Jul-03-11 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
34. BTW: My day began at 0220 AM with another fire
   
I did not even mention that. So my tail is dragging (as is my tale). A lost camper built a HUGH!! bonfire about 4 miles from my lookout. I got up at 2:20 to take care of nature and saw this bright orange glow at the base of Quartz Mountain. So I watched it - dozing off and on - until dawn. Then I had enough light and plenty of smoke to plot and report that fire. Our crew got in and extinguished the fire, then they led him three miles to his intended camp (with his buddies).

Ching-ching! Overtime! Maybe 17.5 hours today!

I wouldn't be surprised if DemoTex didn't start the fire.





Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on July 03, 2011, 07:33:34 AM
Quote
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Sat Jul-02-11 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because the ****ing NRA believes that any asshole should be able to
   
shoot any ****ing weapon they want to where ever they ****ing want to.

**** them.

TRANSLATION: trees > rights...so stop printing newspapers and books...especially Bibles and books about America!
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: vesta111 on July 03, 2011, 07:41:59 AM
Why do I think DemoTex is a phony vet? He claims to be a forest ranger. A few months back, he was transferred to another duty station and because he was inexperienced, he wanted to know what kind of gun to buy for bear/wild animal protection while in the sticks.

His avatar is a Vietnam Service Medal.
 

The VC/NVA used 12/7mm. American forces used the 50 BMG. It seems like he should know this.

obama signed the law allowing firearms in National Forests. Take it up with him.

Different state.

Barrett makes several models that can be carried. The Ma Deuce is not a plinking weapon.

Another clueless DUmmy. Rambo used a M60, which is a 30 cal.

Whoops. He's a combat pilot. Who'd thunk it.

Dirty freeper troll.

The gungeon is a section on the island that is populated by pro gun democrats(moles). Nice slam. Someone should alert Der Skimmer.

I wouldn't be surprised if DemoTex didn't start the fire.

Wait one minute here, was not the 50 caliber guns at one time called Buffalo Guns  ???

Perhaps a bunch of hungry people decided to bag a wild Buffalo and some how missed the game and started a fire.

The fact that the Buffalow hunters that killed millions in a few short years using 50 caliber guns and never burned down a few states is interesting.      :killemall: :killemall: :sarcasm:
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: franksolich on July 03, 2011, 08:05:50 AM
Uh, question.

I really hate to question, but I must.

If the primitive was a pilot in 1970, how come he's still working, and not retired?

Nineteen-seventy was 41 years ago, and one assumes he had at least a couple of years of pilot-training under his belt when that happened with his airplane.  Surely the primitive would be at least 65 years old now, if not more.
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: Tucker on July 03, 2011, 08:37:13 AM
Uh, question.

I really hate to question, but I must.

If the primitive was a pilot in 1970, how come he's still working, and not retired?

Nineteen-seventy was 41 years ago, and one assumes he had at least a couple of years of pilot-training under his belt when that happened with his airplane.  Surely the primitive would be at least 65 years old now, if not more.

Damn Frank. I wondered that while I was reading it and came up with the same age.
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: Tucker on July 03, 2011, 08:41:17 AM
Wait one minute here, was not the 50 caliber guns at one time called Buffalo Guns  ???

Perhaps a bunch of hungry people decided to bag a wild Buffalo and some how missed the game and started a fire.

The fact that the Buffalow hunters that killed millions in a few short years using 50 caliber guns and never burned down a few states is interesting.      :killemall: :killemall: :sarcasm:

You're thinking cap and ball. That's a whole nuther animal. Think the guns at the Alamo.

Anyway. I think the Buffalo gun was a .62 Hawkin
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: dutch508 on July 03, 2011, 09:10:28 AM
You're thinking cap and ball. That's a whole nuther animal. Think the guns at the Alamo.

Anyway. I think the Buffalo gun was a .62 Hawkin

Depending on who you talk to, the sharpe's .50 was thought of as the buffalo gun. But, but, but...as Frank says, there is more than one answer.
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: ScubaGuy on July 03, 2011, 09:19:11 AM
I love his pictures and I think he's for real. 

From what I can gather he lives in SC and travels to Oregon every year to work at a fire lookout.  He has SC Viet Nam veteran tags on the truck and does look to be in his later 60's.  Maybe he does it for the solitude or loves the high desert.

Nice pictures from the lookout (http://journals.democraticunderground.com/DemoTex)

Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: Tucker on July 03, 2011, 09:27:26 AM
I love his pictures and I think he's for real. 

From what I can gather he lives in SC and travels to Oregon every year to work at a fire lookout.  He has SC Viet Nam veteran tags on the truck and does look to be in his later 60's.  Maybe he does it for the solitude or loves the high desert.

Nice pictures from the lookout (http://journals.democraticunderground.com/DemoTex)



That profile can be created in 15 minutes.

I've read several of his threads. He doesn't know jack shit about guns and he should.

Remember that liberals lie.
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: namvet on July 03, 2011, 09:52:06 AM
"What is a 50-caliber?" you ask. It is basically what the VC and NVA
used to shoot down helicopters and low-flying airplanes in Vietnam.


hmmm. I think maybe the AK-47 was their primary weapon. how they aquired the 50 I have no idea. they also used a cheap ass made machine gun made in Russia. don't remember the caliber but I remember seeing one. the PBR's came out to trade weapons for goodies we had on board. they gave this cheap weapon to our CO. it had a block of wood on the barrel and another one for the shoulder.
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: namvet on July 03, 2011, 09:55:17 AM
I love his pictures and I think he's for real. 

From what I can gather he lives in SC and travels to Oregon every year to work at a fire lookout.  He has SC Viet Nam veteran tags on the truck and does look to be in his later 60's.  Maybe he does it for the solitude or loves the high desert.

Nice pictures from the lookout (http://journals.democraticunderground.com/DemoTex)



I have namvet plates on my truck. but I had to send the DMV something called a DD-214. did he???
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: Tucker on July 03, 2011, 10:16:18 AM
I have namvet plates on my truck. but I had to send the DMV something called a DD-214. did he???

That was my point about a fake profile. He could have taken a pic of your truck and claimed it as his own. How would anyone know?
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: tanstaafl on July 03, 2011, 10:17:00 AM
I love his pictures and I think he's for real. 

From what I can gather he lives in SC and travels to Oregon every year to work at a fire lookout.  He has SC Viet Nam veteran tags on the truck and does look to be in his later 60's.  Maybe he does it for the solitude or loves the high desert.

Nice pictures from the lookout (http://journals.dtemocraticunderground.com/DemoTex)


Looks legit to me, also. I did alot of shooting in the Grasslands in Wyoming over the past 18 months. Mostly .223/5.56, some .308/7.62 and a couple of times with (I presume) Barret Point 5-0. Never started no fires, tho.

The pics on his website were good enough for the enjoyment of the wilderness area. His use of the term "Wild Lands" tells me that the people he encountered on ATV's with a .50 Cal were within their rights, shooting into the crater. "Wild Lands" is the now perferred term for Forest Service lands not inside National Park boundaries which Zero and his enviro-minions want to put off limits for everyday use by citizens and place under the same rules as Parks (No Developement for natural resourse, grazing or casual use by the true owners : US!
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: ScubaGuy on July 03, 2011, 10:19:31 AM
I have namvet plates on my truck. but I had to send the DMV something called a DD-214. did he???

It looks like SC requires a DD-214 or other documentation for VV tags. Not knowing what the other documentation is, he could be a fake.

My opinion on his real status is just based on my gut feeling.  I certainly could be wrong and it wouldn't surprise me if I was wrong.

Posers like AnArmyVet, Monkeyman and Tit were obvious even before they made their big blunders and exposed themselves.  Remember  how AnArmyVet couldn't understand the  "God Bless the Troops (Especially the Snipers)" bumper sticker?

SC special plate requirements. (http://www.scdmvonline.com/DMVNew/PlateGallery.aspx?q=Military)
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: GOBUCKS on July 03, 2011, 10:50:28 AM
Uh, question.

I really hate to question, but I must.

If the primitive was a pilot in 1970, how come he's still working, and not retired?

Nineteen-seventy was 41 years ago, and one assumes he had at least a couple of years of pilot-training under his belt when that happened with his airplane.  Surely the primitive would be at least 65 years old now, if not more.
DUmmy DemoTex was in the air wing of TiT's imaginary Seal Team.
He's a firearms expert who has never heard of a .50 caliber Barrett.
The only NVA weapon he's ever seen was a photo in a magazine, and it had Jane Fonda sitting on it.
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: Skul on July 03, 2011, 11:59:11 AM
Quote
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Sat Jul-02-11 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. I just used anti-aircraft as an example (because of my intimate experience with 12.7mm)
   
Had the 12.7mm (50-cal) that ripped through my wing in 1970 exploded, as it was designed to do, I probably would not be posting here tonight. I was a lucky-ducky.

There are a few types of fifty projectiles.
None of them technically, are explosive.
I suspect a poser.
If demotex is reading this thread, perhaps he could supply us with his flight school class number.
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: Tucker on July 03, 2011, 01:32:16 PM
There are a few types of fifty projectiles.
None of them technically, are explosive.
I suspect a poser.
If demotex is reading this thread, perhaps he could supply us with his flight school class number.

50's don't have a charged projectile. They will light up a vehicle though.  :-)
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: GOBUCKS on July 03, 2011, 01:45:45 PM
You're thinking cap and ball. That's a whole nuther animal. Think the guns at the Alamo. 
Bingo. I would wager that at least 99.998% of all .50 cal. weapons in this country are muzzleloaders used for deer, even if you count miliary weapons.
There are literally millions of us rednecks using them every year.
If you fire one after dark, especially if you've used 100 grains or more of black powder or Pyrodex, it looks like a flame thrower.
It would still be the slimmest of slim chances that it could ever start a brush fire.
DemoTex is a TiTtyboyish liar.
 
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: Tess Anderson on July 03, 2011, 02:51:52 PM
Yes, I've noticed this particular tard before - he's ALWAYS posting nature pictures, I think he's some volunteer fireman.

Quote
DemoTex  (1000+ posts)        Sun Jul-03-11 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
34. BTW: My day began at 0220 AM with another fire
 I did not even mention that. So my tail is dragging (as is my tale). A lost camper built a HUGH!! bonfire about 4 miles from my lookout. I got up at 2:20 to take care of nature and saw this bright orange glow at the base of Quartz Mountain. So I watched it - dozing off and on - until dawn. Then I had enough light and plenty of smoke to plot and report that fire. Our crew got in and extinguished the fire, then they led him three miles to his intended camp (with his buddies). Ching-ching! Overtime! Maybe 17.5 hours today!

But he has all time in the world to post to the DUmp. Check out his blog, full of pics of himself at that damned tower. 
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: FiddyBeowulf on July 03, 2011, 05:11:17 PM
I love his pictures and I think he's for real. 

From what I can gather he lives in SC and travels to Oregon every year to work at a fire lookout.  He has SC Viet Nam veteran tags on the truck and does look to be in his later 60's.  Maybe he does it for the solitude or loves the high desert.

Nice pictures from the lookout (http://journals.democraticunderground.com/DemoTex)


I noticed in his photos we have another DUmmie who supports his union brothers in Detroit by owning a truck made by Toyota.
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: GOBUCKS on July 03, 2011, 05:20:26 PM
Quote
Ching-ching! Overtime! Maybe 17.5 hours today!

Surely a DUmbass smoking weed in a lookout tower all summer doesn't get overtime pay.
And why does such a job even exist?
You could have a half-dozen super hi-def color video cameras panning up there for a tiny fraction of the cost.
And the cameras wouldn't be getting high.
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: skipuno on July 03, 2011, 05:33:12 PM
I have a 50 cal blackpowder rifle. There is also the Desert Eagle 50 cal pistol. Most likely it was one of these.
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: thundley4 on July 03, 2011, 08:02:22 PM
I have a 50 cal blackpowder rifle. There is also the Desert Eagle 50 cal pistol. Most likely it was one of these.

The Desert Eagle was my first thought, too.
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on July 03, 2011, 10:10:26 PM
Quote
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Sat Jul-02-11 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. I just used anti-aircraft as an example (because of my intimate experience with 12.7mm)
   
Had the 12.7mm (50-cal) that ripped through my wing in 1970 exploded, as it was designed to do, I probably would not be posting here tonight. I was a lucky-ducky.

Well, you are an idiot, and if you really did fly in Viet Nam, your survival owes everything to pure, dumb luck and American air dominance, and nothing whatsoever to your thundering ignorance on anything concerning ordnance.

There are no explosive projos for the US .50, the Russkii 12.7, or even the considerably more-powerful Russkii 14.5 (Or the British .55 BOYS, or the Czech/British 15mm BESA, for that matter).  Explosive projectiles start with the 20mm cannon in our gear, or the 23mm in Soviet Bloc weapons.  It is more or less what actually distinguishes a 'Machinegun' from an 'Automatic cannon.'
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: GOBUCKS on July 03, 2011, 10:32:12 PM
Quote
DemoTex  (1000+ posts)        Sun Jul-03-11 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #117
120. Exactly right. Thanks. 
 I have no idea what weapon fired this 50-cal round, but I do know that the projectile had incendiary characteristics. The USFS fire investigators know that, too. Flint and steel generated sparks do not start a fire as quickly as this one started.

I'm glad you equated the 50-cal to the 12.7mm. That was mt point with the anti-aircraft discussion. If I remember correctly, the 12.7 is a mm or two larger than our 50-cal, so that they can use ammo captured from us but we can't use their ammo. Is that correct?

Does anyone still believe this DUmbass was ever in the military?
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: Chris_ on July 03, 2011, 10:33:47 PM
Does anyone still believe this DUmbass was ever in the military?
I think Click and Clack used that as a puzzler on Car Talk a couple weeks ago. :rofl:
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: Tucker on July 03, 2011, 10:50:16 PM

Does anyone still believe this DUmbass was ever in the military?

See title of thread.
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: JakeStyle on July 03, 2011, 11:19:36 PM
I love his pictures and I think he's for real.  

From what I can gather he lives in SC and travels to Oregon every year to work at a fire lookout.  He has SC Viet Nam veteran tags on the truck and does look to be in his later 60's.  Maybe he does it for the solitude or loves the high desert.

Nice pictures from the lookout (http://journals.democraticunderground.com/DemoTex)

I've been reading his stuff for a couple years now and I think he's legit, he has even posted pictures of himself in uniform standing in front of his aircraft.  He may be a DUmbass but I don't doubt that he served.
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: GOBUCKS on July 03, 2011, 11:28:41 PM
Quote
DemoTex  (1000+ posts)        Sun Jul-03-11 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #118
122. I'm very familiar with the "black powder" genre.  
 Edited on Sun Jul-03-11 11:45 PM by DemoTex
But I did not try to tell you much about the weapon, did I? Go back and read my post. I told you what the fire investigator found (and/or, what the perps admitted to). But I concentrated on the round size and the damage the round did. Period.

I used the AA example as illustrative. Personal experience, that I doubt you have. I never said what type of gun this was.

Argue with that. WTF does it matter, other that the FACT that an incendiary round (50-cal by their admission) caused this incredibly destructive, dangerous, and expensive fire?

What the hell is your beef?

Now DUmmy DemoTex is getting touchy. Just like TiTtyboy would do whenever doubt was cast on one of his fantastical tales.

DemoTex is the second most highly decorated enlisted carrier pilot of the Viet Nam era. He flew a specially-equipped B-52 off the Kitty Hawk, and on one memorable mission dropped a nuclear weapon on Haiphong Harbor.

Unfortunately, due to a drunken long-haired SEAL river boat pilot who was doing TDY on board the Kitty Hawk as a fill-in nuclear weapons guard, a saboteur damaged the bomb trigger, and it failed to detonate.

It was that incident, along with elevator and hangar difficulties, that caused the Navy to terminate the program to adapt B-52 bombers for carrier launch and recovery. DUmmy DemoTex was among the few pilots with enough skill to bring the huge bomber safely aboard a carrier, owing to its enormous wingspan, which was nearly 60 feet wider than the carrier itself.

Leaving the pilot ranks, DUmmy DemoTex became the top enlisted small arms weapons advisor to the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The last ten years of his career were spent developing explosive projectiles for the M-16. He is still regarded as the father of the .22 cal. high-explosive anti-tank round, the mother of which is, of course, nadin.

Really. Seriously.
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: Big Dog on July 04, 2011, 01:46:48 AM

Now DUmmy DemoTex is getting touchy. Just like TiTtyboy would do whenever doubt was cast on one of his fantastical tales.

DemoTex is the second most highly decorated enlisted carrier pilot of the Viet Nam era.

I think DemoTex is a legitimate Vietnam Veteran. The pictures on page 6 of his journal are real-deal; the aircraft (Lockheed SP-2E Neptune) and Army unit (1st Radio Research Company) he mentioned check out. Also, given the general DUmbass attitude toward Veterans, especially Vietnam Veterans, he would get a lot more DU street cred by claiming to be an anti-war protestor.

It's really not so surprising that he is ignorant about weapons. As an Army pilot, he may have qualified once with an M-14 or M-16, and carried a .38 revolver (or less likely a .45 pistol) after that. He may have had absolutely no experience with firearms before or after his Army service. I served with many pilots who had not even held an M-16 in 10 years or more, and were just as ignorant about firearms as DemoTex.

Edit: I found this on page 7: "I have been unarmed since about 9/28/1970, two days before I DEROSed Viet Nam. I ain't re-arming anytime soon." That explains it.

I'd expect DemoTex to know the nomenclature and capabilities of the enemy's anti-aircraft weapons, but a lot of details could have washed away after 40 years (like the bit about 12.7s firing .50 BMG ammo).

DemoTex is a good photographer, and his dog Nick looks happy and healthy, so he clearly treats his best friend well. I respect his service, past and present, but he's still a DUmbass.
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: Tucker on July 04, 2011, 06:46:38 AM

Now DUmmy DemoTex is getting touchy. Just like TiTtyboy would do whenever doubt was cast on one of his fantastical tales.

DemoTex is the second most highly decorated enlisted carrier pilot of the Viet Nam era. He flew a specially-equipped B-52 off the Kitty Hawk, and on one memorable mission dropped a nuclear weapon on Haiphong Harbor.

Unfortunately, due to a drunken long-haired SEAL river boat pilot who was doing TDY on board the Kitty Hawk as a fill-in nuclear weapons guard, a saboteur damaged the bomb trigger, and it failed to detonate.

It was that incident, along with elevator and hangar difficulties, that caused the Navy to terminate the program to adapt B-52 bombers for carrier launch and recovery. DUmmy DemoTex was among the few pilots with enough skill to bring the huge bomber safely aboard a carrier, owing to its enormous wingspan, which was nearly 60 feet wider than the carrier itself.

Leaving the pilot ranks, DUmmy DemoTex became the top enlisted small arms weapons advisor to the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The last ten years of his career were spent developing explosive projectiles for the M-16. He is still regarded as the father of the .22 cal. high-explosive anti-tank round, the mother of which is, of course, nadin.

Really. Seriously.

H5.

Only thing missing is 11Bravo's life was saved by the failure to detonate. 11Boo then went on to sell his story to Hollywood, which was made into the movie, Hamburger Hill.
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: Skul on July 04, 2011, 08:42:07 AM
<<<It's really not so surprising that he is ignorant about weapons. As an Army pilot, he may have qualified once with an M-14 or M-16, and carried a .38 revolver (or less likely a .45 pistol) after that. He may have had absolutely no experience with firearms before or after his Army service. I served with many pilots who had not even held an M-16 in 10 years or more, and were just as ignorant about firearms as DemoTex.>>>
He was not Army, if he purports to have been with P2's. That's Navy.
Yes, both 14 and 16.  The .45 was standard issue, not the .38.
The .45 was often worn placed between the legs while flying, to protect the family jewels.
I also carried at times the M1A1 TSMG, M3 (not he A1 varient), and AK.
The AK was traded for a .38 which I carried along with the .45.

He may have been there, but, I suspect as a crew member, not a peter pilot.

BTW, this is what a 12.7 can do to a Huey.

Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: USA4ME on July 04, 2011, 09:58:22 AM
The DemoTex primitive used to live down the road from where I do about 45 minutes.  He may still, but he's been doing the forest ranger thing in Oregon for 3-4 years now.  When I was moling on the island back around 2004-05, I PM'd him and was going to meet him at a BBQ restaurant about half-way between where we live, and I was going to take him flying in my Piper, but it never worked out.  He's just another of many Vets who raised his hand and swore to defend the US Constitution who later on decided to turn his back on the country and become a liberal.

.
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: Big Dog on July 04, 2011, 10:04:09 AM
He was not Army, if he purports to have been with P2's. That's Navy.
Yes, both 14 and 16.  The .45 was standard issue, not the .38.
The .45 was often worn placed between the legs while flying, to protect the family jewels.
I also carried at times the M1A1 TSMG, M3 (not he A1 varient), and AK.
The AK was traded for a .38 which I carried along with the .45.

He may have been there, but, I suspect as a crew member, not a peter pilot.

BTW, this is what a 12.7 can do to a Huey.



First thing first: Welcome home, Brother, and happy Independence Day.

With respect, I disagree with you on a couple of points.

The Army Security Agency had at least one company of P2s in Vietnam for ELINT. The 1st RRC (AVN), 224th AVN BN was based at Cam Rahn Bay from June 1967 until it cased its guidon in April 1972. The Air Force and CIA also had Neptunes, with one mission being the dropping of ASW sonobouys along the Ho Chi Minh Trail.

The picture on the DUmmie's page shows an Army officer  (either 1LT or warrant officer, hard to tell which) standing beside the portside propeller of a P2 Neptune.

I will defer to your experience on the .38 vs .45. I was a flight medic from 1980-1986 and my issued weapon was a .38. When I transferred to a medical NCO slot in an Air Cav squadron in 1986, my weapon was a .45.

Just one word about the picture: Shit.
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: Skul on July 04, 2011, 10:10:26 AM
First thing first: Welcome home, Brother, and happy Independence Day.

With respect, I disagree with you on a couple of points.

The Army Security Agency had at least one company of P2s in Vietnam for ELINT. The 1st RRC (AVN), 224th AVN BN was based at Cam Rahn Bay from June 1967 until it cased its guidon in April 1972. The Air Force and CIA also had Neptunes, with one mission being the dropping of ASW sonobouys along the Ho Chi Minh Trail.

The picture on the DUmmie's page shows an Army officer  (either 1LT or warrant officer, hard to tell which) standing beside the portside propeller of a P2 Neptune.

I will defer to your experience on the .38 vs .45. I was a flight medic from 1980-1986 and my issued weapon was an old (but very serviceable) Smith and Wesson Model 10 .38. When I transferred to a medical NCO slot in an Air Cav squadron in 1986, my weapon was a .45.

Just one word about the picture: Shit.
Didn't know that.  I was way up north.
Yes, I believe I did. :lmao:  It was noisy, btw.
I'll go try and find that one pic in his page.

(edit)
Unable to find pic.
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: Skul on July 04, 2011, 11:11:15 AM
Gave it some thought.
I think the guy is legit.
He's just ignorant of firearms, and failed to tell the whole truth.
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: Tucker on July 04, 2011, 11:33:43 AM
Gave it some thought.
I think the guy is legit.
He's just ignorant of firearms, and failed to tell the whole truth.

Once a person has established themself as a liar, what can you believe?
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: GOBUCKS on July 04, 2011, 11:38:24 AM
Military pilots are the epitome of the American hero. They're among the main reasons that America is America.

Military pilots are examples of the very best America has to offer.

DUmmy DemoTex is a DUmpmonkey, a lying, leftist, America-hating scum.

Without exception, DUmpmonkeys are traitorous douchebags. Otherwise, they wouldn't be DUmpmonkeys.

I guess that dilemma could be explained by traumatic brain injury, or a surrender to illegal drugs.

So it's possible, though highly unlikely, that at one time DUmmy DemoTex was normal.
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: Big Dog on July 04, 2011, 07:36:34 PM
Didn't know that.  I was way up north.
Yes, I believe I did. :lmao:  It was noisy, btw.
I'll go try and find that one pic in his page.

(edit)
Unable to find pic.

DummyTex's picture page (http://journals.democraticunderground.com/?az=archives&j=135&page=6)

Vietnam pics about 1/4 of the way down.

Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: Skul on July 05, 2011, 12:03:10 AM
DummyTex's picture page (http://journals.democraticunderground.com/?az=archives&j=135&page=6)

Vietnam pics about 1/4 of the way down.


Got it, BD.
Quality sucks.
Guy is most likely an LT.
I appreciate the time you took to find that.
Earns a H5.
Xnks, bud.
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: NHSparky on July 05, 2011, 06:43:26 AM
I'm not a Vietnam veteran, but I'll take a wild-assed guess and say that if there was any small arms used against American aircraft it would START at the ZPU Quad 14.5MM Russian gun, then work up to 20MM, 37MM, and so on up to 85 and 100MM AA rounds before you get into the SAM-2 missiles.

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/06/14%2C5-%D0%BC%D0%BC_%D1%81%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%B7%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D1%83%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D1%83%D0%BA%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%9B%D0%B5%D1%89%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE_%D0%97%D0%9F%D0%A3-4_%281%29.jpg/800px-14%2C5-%D0%BC%D0%BC_%D1%81%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%B7%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D1%83%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D1%83%D0%BA%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%9B%D0%B5%D1%89%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE_%D0%97%D0%9F%D0%A3-4_%281%29.jpg)

Looks a lot like the gun Hanoi Jane squatted on, doesn't it, DUmmies?

.50 cal?  Not so much.  Oh, and if the guy was a fixed wing pilot, I'd love to know what he flew. 
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: NHSparky on July 05, 2011, 06:52:33 AM

Does anyone still believe this DUmbass was ever in the military?

Nope.  Although the .50 cal was a SHORTER round 12.7 mm X 99 mm versus the Soviet 12.7 mm round of 12.7 X 108 mm, notice they are in fact BOTH 12.7 mm, DUmmies.
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: formerlurker on July 05, 2011, 06:54:06 AM
Got it, BD.
Quality sucks.
Guy is most likely an LT.
I appreciate the time you took to find that.
Earns a H5.
Xnks, bud.

Enlisted guys flew in the Army in Vietnam.   I don't see officer rank on his uniform, but it is really not a clear picture.
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: namvet on July 05, 2011, 08:18:44 AM
(http://www.motifake.com/image/demotivational-poster/0912/hanoi-jane-jane-fonda-hanoi-jane-vietnam-anti-air-gun-demotivational-poster-1260373374.jpg)

we caught up with her locally here back 2005

Quote
KANSAS CITY, Mo. -- A man who had waited in line at a book-signing in Kansas City for Academy Award-winning actress Jane Fonda spit tobacco juice in her face Tuesday night.
The suspect, Vietnam veteran Michael A. Smith, 54, Smith said that his actions were planned and he has no regrets. He said he's a Vietnam veteran still angry at Fonda for her trip to Hanoi in 1972.

"She's a traitor, and she cost the lives of a lot of good men," Smith, who was 19 when he was sent to fight in Vietnam, told KMBC-TV in Kansas City. "She didn't do anything to the government -- she slapped us in the face."

In 1972, Fonda, who actively opposed the Vietnam War, was photographed sitting in a North Vietnamese anti-aircraft tank. About her involvement in the Vietnam War, Fonda has publicly apologized for the photo. She has called it an incredible lapse in judgment.

During her Tuesday night visit, Fonda talked to the crowd about her trip to North Vietnam.


(http://www.clickorlando.com/2005/0420/4398579_320X240.jpg)

http://www.clickorlando.com/entertainment/4400956/detail.html
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: NHSparky on July 05, 2011, 08:20:15 AM
All I can say is that when she croaks, she better be buried in an unmarked grave or one with posted guards 24/7, or she'll float away on the river of piss from Vietnam veterans.
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: namvet on July 05, 2011, 08:44:49 AM
Broadcast Over Radio Hanoi
To American Servicemen Involved In The Indochina War
by Jane Fonda
American Actress, Political Activist


The following was reprinted in the report of Hearings before the U.S. Congress House of Repesentatives Committee on Internal Security, Travel to Hostile Areas. Hearings on HR16742, 19 and 25 September 1972 at page 7671.

This is Jane Fonda. During my two week visit in the Democratic Republic of Vietnam, I've had the opportunity to visit a great many places and speak to a large number of people from all walks of life--workers, peasants, students, artists and dancers, historians, journalists, film actresses, soldiers, militia girls, members of the women's union, writers.

I visited the (Dam Xuac) agricultural co-op, where the silk worms are also raised and thread is made. I visited a textile factory, a kindergarten in Hanoi. The beautiful Temple of Literature was where I saw traditional dances and heard songs of resistance. I also saw unforgettable ballet about the guerrillas training bees in the south to attack enemy soldiers. The bees were danced by women, and they did their job well.

In the shadow of the Temple of Literature I saw Vietnamese actors and actresses perform the second act of Arthur Miller's play All My Sons, and this was very moving to me--the fact that artists here are translating and performing American plays while US imperialists are bombing their country.

I cherish the memory of the blushing militia girls on the roof of their factory, encouraging one of their sisters as she sang a song praising the blue sky of Vietnam--these women, who are so gentle and poetic, whose voices are so beautiful, but who, when American planes are bombing their city, become such good fighters.

I cherish the way a farmer evacuated from Hanoi, without hesitation, offered me, an American, their best individual bomb shelter while US bombs fell near by. The daughter and I, in fact, shared the shelter wrapped in each others arms, cheek against cheek. It was on the road back from Nam Dinh, where I had witnessed the systematic destruction of civilian targets-schools, hospitals, pagodas, the factories, houses, and the dike system.

As I left the United States two weeks ago, Nixon was again telling the American people that he was winding down the war, but in the rubble-strewn streets of Nam Dinh, his words echoed with sinister (words indistinct) of a true killer. And like the young Vietnamese woman I held in my arms clinging to me tightly--and I pressed my cheek against hers--I thought, this is a war against Vietnam perhaps, but the tragedy is America's.

One thing that I have learned beyond a shadow of a doubt since I've been in this country is that Nixon will never be able to break the spirit of these people; he'll never be able to turn Vietnam, north and south, into a neo-colony of the United States by bombing, by invading, by attacking in any way. One has only to go into the countryside and listen to the peasants describe the lives they led before the revolution to understand why every bomb that is dropped only strengthens their determination to resist.

I've spoken to many peasants who talked about the days when their parents had to sell themselves to landlords as virtually slaves, when there were very few schools and much illiteracy, inadequate medical care, when they were not masters of their own lives.

But now, despite the bombs, despite the crimes being created--being committed against them by Richard Nixon, these people own their own land, build their own schools--the children learning, literacy--illiteracy is being wiped out, there is no more prostitution as there was during the time when this was a French colony. In other words, the people have taken power into their own hands, and they are controlling their own lives.

And after 4,000 years of struggling against nature and foreign invaders--and the last 25 years, prior to the revolution, of struggling against French colonialism--I don't think that the people of Vietnam are about to compromise in any way, shape or form about the freedom and independence of their country, and I think Richard Nixon would do well to read Vietnamese history, particularly their poetry, and particularly the poetry written by Ho Chi Minh.
http://gos.sbc.edu/f/fonda.html

-------------------------

the North was relying heavily on dissension back in the states to win this war for them. after the TET offensive in 68 they were beaten to a pulp. we were just sittin' around playing cards and waiting for the papers to be signed when LBJ ordered the bombing halt. so Fonda, Kerry and their Ilk did the job.  
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on July 05, 2011, 09:59:07 AM
I'm not a Vietnam veteran, but I'll take a wild-assed guess and say that if there was any small arms used against American aircraft it would START at the ZPU Quad 14.5MM Russian gun, then work up to 20MM, 37MM, and so on up to 85 and 100MM AA rounds before you get into the SAM-2 missiles.

Sparky, the Commie's flexible-mount HMG was the 12.7mm 'Dashka,' and the main AAA weapon encountered in the south.  The i14.5 and higher-caliber stuff was mostly limited to North Viet Nam and other areas which they believed to be secure from ground incursion, because they lack the ability for infantry to quickly break them down and scurry away on foot cross-country.

The 12.7 is for all intents and purposes ballistically identical to our .50 cal, though for my $.02 oure AN-M2HB is a MUCH better made than any version of the DShK, the old Browning does pay a certain weight penalty for that solidity. 

The 14.5 delivers about twice the energy of a 12.7, and although its round descends from the PTRS and PTRD Soviet antitank rifles of WW2, for some reason it has never been employed in a flexible, single gun infantry-transportable mounting, only in multiple-gun AAA towed artillery mounts and as the principal armament of light wheeled armor like the BDRM-2.

Neither 12.7 nor 14.5 projos are explosive, just the normal run of ball/AP/tracer/incendiary rounds like we have for ous .50.   
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: Skul on July 05, 2011, 10:17:10 AM
Enlisted guys flew in the Army in Vietnam.   I don't see officer rank on his uniform, but it is really not a clear picture.
As gunners, crew chiefs, load-masters, etc.  Not as drivers.
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: vesta111 on July 07, 2011, 10:25:52 AM
What a bitch life is.

I at that time also worried about what our president was doing sending our youth--my age into war.    I also did not trust Tricky Dickey , or any of his henchmen.   When the great Dick claimed he was not a crook, years later I would hear another President say, he did not have sex with THAT woman.

However back in time when Jane went to VN and betrayed her Country's youth in POW camps and did her song and dance, I was stunned that this nobody could cause all that horror to our troops all just for I believe publicity.    Hate is a hard word but I came very close to it just thinking about the suffering she caused.

So when Years later McCain ran for president I had not forgotten his action to save his own skin.  I believe he also sold out our youth, survived only by his family's influence and cooperating above and beyond what his captors  expected.

When it came to the Presidential run, I was very scared of McCain, here was a man I believed was not to be trusted----The fact he dumped a wife who spent a few years trying to get him out of that POW camp,  to marry a woman with more money and influence then his wife, this man was just no damn good to my mind.

So what choice did America have but to choose McCain or this total unknown Dude from Chicago????

To top it off, after all these years we still have Jane in the headlines, making her excuses and justifying all the deaths, torture etc she caused without a single tear or regret.

Now Jane is back AGAIN making money on the backs of our dead Youth she caused.  Along comes a man with the balls to stand up to her, to disgrace her, -----this just rolled off her back, no problem folks, just his opinion,no  shame no apology's, morally bankrupt.

I am just one of those evil people that will NEVER forgive HER or McCain for their actions, at least McCain has some kind of reason to help out the Enemy----Jane has no reason but fame and fortune.  Her biggest act of treason in my book was when a POW slipped her a note she did not read it, she handed the note to the Commander of the Camp.  For that act she should have been HUNG.

Got me going here about things that happend long ago but still are alive and happening weraring a different hat today.

Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: Tucker on July 07, 2011, 10:37:03 AM

So when Years later McCain ran for president I had not forgotten his action to save his own skin.  I believe he also sold out our youth, survived only by his family's influence and cooperating above and beyond what his captors  expected.

When it came to the Presidential run, I was very scared of McCain, here was a man I believed was not to be trusted----The fact he dumped a wife who spent a few years trying to get him out of that POW camp,  to marry a woman with more money and influence then his wife, this man was just no damn good to my mind.




I detest McCain the politician. I admire and respect McCain the verteran.
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on July 07, 2011, 10:38:23 AM
Well, vesta, just for my $.02, despite all the half-witted, Camelot-fixated stupid bullshit McCain worked himself into later in the Senate, resulting in him being only the 'Less-horrible' choice in 2008, the time he spent as a POW was about as honorably and bravely done as anyone could ask, and damned few could match.  Your perspective on this one just seems kinda weird.   
Title: Re: Another fake vet tells what caused forest fire in TX- probably a bouncy
Post by: Tucker on July 07, 2011, 10:47:54 AM
Well, vesta, just for my $.02, despite all the half-witted, Camelot-fixated stupid bullshit McCain worked himself into later in the Senate, resulting in him being only the 'Less-horrible' choice in 2008, the time he spent as a POW was about as honorably and bravely done as anyone could ask, and damned few could match.  Your perspective on this one just seems kinda weird.   

Ross Perots running mate, James Stockdale, was another example of duty and honor.