What's really insulting (no surprises) is the incoherence and illogical notions of some of these arguments. God knows I'm not in the mood for a several post debate (how many msgboards must I do it) but I have to take issue with at least a few "ideas" put out there about my religion:
1. Islam is violent because there are parts of the Qur'an that are "violent" or incidents committed in history that are "violent".
First of all, I would like those who share that opinion and quote the Robert Spencer's of the world (who seem to leave out other non-Muslim authors like Karen Armstrong) to list every chapter and verse of said "violent" verses. There are about 20 to 30, I know them by heart btw. Then I would like for you to not only explain why they are violent, but also why these 20-30 versus in your opinion summarizes the book outside of the other 6000 plus verses. Then after that, explain why don't you use the same standard to define other religious books and religions, because I can assure you that you will not find the equivalent of "you shall not leave alive anything that breathes" (Deutronomy 20:10-17) in the Qur'an. Then after that, because we all know that your line of defense will rest in arguments about context and the really knowledgeable in Christian Theology will use words like exegesis, please explain why it is wrong for Muslims to do the same with the Qur'an.
The truth is the numbers go against the arguments. There are more "peaceful" versus in the Qur'an than "violent" by a landslide, and their are hundreds of millions of Muslims more peaceful than violent (hell one sect Ahmaddiyah claims 300 million and their motto is "love for all hatred of none").
The real question is why do you embrace faulty logic? When has it ever been considered logical that anything less than 51% equals the majority? If you can't prove (and you can't) that more than 51% of the Qur'an or Muslims are violent, then by still saying that it/they are, is more of a personal opinion (for God only knows what reasons) and there is no empirical evidence to support your claim(s).
2. Silence=acceptance.
No disrespect but that is just a stupid concept. If that were true, does that mean that because there aren't massive protests in the streets against rape, murder, theft, etc. that Americans all agree with these things? How often is someone raped in America for instance? 76% of 300 Million Americans are Christian, should we state based on this conclusion that the majority of Christians in America agree with the level of violence in this country? What's good for the goose is also good for the gander.
3. Muslims need to speak out.
I have been down this road so many times before that it's driving me crazy! I'm completely convinced that most of those who are anti-Islam are just lying in the public to cover their private opinions. Just state matter of factly that you just hate Muslims plain and simple because they don't look, act, or believe like you. It's better than just making ludicrous statements that make you look simple.
It never ceases to amaze me how some of you can Google and find everything negative you need to find about Islam, yet somehow miss the multitude of statements, speeches, and facts that are out there? It's not that Muslims aren't doing it, it's that many aren't listening, promoting, and giving audience to. I have proven many times in the past that Muslim do in fact speak out. It's not our fault it's not covered on Fox News. Seriously, do you expect Fox News to air a peace rally by Muslims? Don't say yes, because 10K Muslims met in Harrisonburg, PA last year and we reached out to the press and was told by cable news outlets (yes one was Fox) that it was not "newsworthy". Every year in DC we don't a 9/11 interfaith peace rally, it's never covered either. Go to my site and/or blog and there are links to many statements, fatwas, etc. etc. past and present since 9/11 that are against terrorism, these statements are from almost every Islamic group under the sun as well as Islamic scholars, clerics, mufti's, heads of state, etc. etc.
If you truly wanted to see it, then call the executive producer of your favorite news source and ask them why they keep telling Muslim American groups that these things aren't "newsworthy".
Muslim Voices Against Extremism and Terrorism
http://theamericanmuslim.org/tam.php/features/articles/muslim_voices_against_extremism_and_terrorism_2/Muslims against Terrorism
http://www.islamfortoday.com/terrorism.htmWhen I state that we need a new PR person, it's not because the work isn't being done, it's because we haven't done what is necessary to make these producers air our work. Many anti-Muslim types are too lazy to read, so they rely on cable news and a few websites from non and "former" Muslims for their source of information. Muslims need to do what Muslims like Mike Ghouse (
http://worldmuslimcongress.blogspot.com/) is doing and challenge people on the foolishness that many of you recite like parrots. I for one will debate anyone, anywhere, on these issues.
Anyone can pick up a book extract a verse and give it their own opinion. It takes another person to actually study, read, and examine the entire book, in the original tongue, the history, etc. and understand what is being communicated.