http://upload.democraticunderground.com/10022218773
seabeyond (81,772 posts)
do men, who do not believe in white male privilege/entitlement oppose affirmative action?
i ask this because last night my teenage son came to me telling me about the NFL discussing no african american was hired as a coach this year. that it is wrong. they need to hire black coaches every year to get a balance or something.
he was telling me in his view, that if no black coach was as capable as a white, that they should not have to hire a black coach.
he said they are for the win, for the money and they would naturally hire the best person for the job. that it was not about racism.
i had to explain to him, again, about privilege and entitlement. that men who are not racist are still raised in a culture of privilege and entitlement and that they do not always recognize they are denying blacks jobs. but, through those two conditionings, they automatically go to the white person. and that is why we have affirmative action.
i gave him examples and one was a study done on names written on applications. white sounding names got call backs over 50% of black sounding names even when a black sounding name was more qualified.
so, this has me thinking. if you do not believe in privilege and entitlement, i would think you would have to oppose affirmative action.
Is it just me or does anyone else see this when they see seabeyond?
The denture adhesive primitive apparently is a fan of e.e.cummings when it comes to capitalization.
All kidding aside, this is a well populated campfire. I just grabbed a handful of stupid and rowed back over, enjoy.
Romulox (22,304 posts)
6. How does the OP explain that about 70% of NFL players are black? Racism in coaching, merit on the
field?
Response to Romulox (Reply #6)
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 11:28 AM
seabeyond (81,772 posts)
9. big difference between the front office jobs and head coach, and the players on the field.
that would be like looking at a corporation and saying, but look at all the employees on the lower tier that is of minority. forget all the management, upper management and owners are white males.
and that would be 65% and that includes mixed race. i assume that a drop of black blood makes one black and not white. saying, it seems if it is a biracial person they are catagorized as black when they have equal white in them. so i think i will step back from the 65%.
Response to seabeyond (Reply #9)
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 11:32 AM
Romulox (22,304 posts)
15. "Big difference" doesn't explain why the players are selected for merit, but coaches aren't.
WHY is there a "big difference"? If you think racism is the reason, I think an explanation of how and why is in order.
Response to Romulox (Reply #15)
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 11:39 AM
seabeyond (81,772 posts)
20. as i said, i think that there is a conscious and unconscious belief that white male own those
Last edited Sat Jan 19, 2013, 11:39 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
positions of power and authority out of entitlement that is more subconscious than conscious.
hence the need for affirmative action
Response to seabeyond (Reply #20)
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 11:46 AM
Romulox (22,304 posts)
22. When you phrase it like that, I actually agree.
Good point.
Response to seabeyond (Reply #20)
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 11:54 AM
Travis_0004 (739 posts)
26. So if you support affirmite action, should there be less black players?
It looks like White people are underrepresented in football, probably basketball (although I'll admit, overrepresented in hockey). Should affirmative action require more white people to be hired?
I'm going to stand by my previous comment, and say I want the best person for the job. If that means 100% black people, I'm fine with it. If it means 100% white people, I'm fine with it.
Response to Travis_0004 (Reply #26)
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 12:27 PM
seabeyond (81,772 posts)
34. it is with numbers. times. passes. scores. those are clear black and white number to the best
Last edited Sat Jan 19, 2013, 12:27 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
player, firstly. while coach and front office is qualitative/subjective. shoot off a gun for a race and the person at the end of the race with best time, has nothing subjective in the win.
secondly, that thinking totally ignores a history of an oppressed group vs a non oppressed or oppressive group.
your argument does not stand.