Author Topic: " James Holmes is not guilty until found such" (Nad lectures on criminal law)  (Read 1290 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Tess Anderson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4058
  • Reputation: +2697/-30
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002990633
 :rotf:
Quote
nadinbrzezinski (106,587 posts)

 James Holmes is not guilty until found such
That said, I got a sneaky that the competency hearing will be all kinds of fun. If he finds a good lawyer, he might even find himself in the same place Loughner has...who has yet to see more than a competency hearing.

And if he is that nuts and incapable of standing trial, well then, do the same as they've done with Loughner...he's still behind bars, but receiving the care he needs.

I will add this, there is one more victim here, James Holmes himself and his family. Yesterday I avoided a trip to Rancho Peñasquitos, because I know that.

Oh and it goes without saying, pointing out this, is rarely popular in our very vindictive society.
Quote
zappaman (5,467 posts)
7. Gee thanks for educating all us peons how the justice system works.

Truly is there anything you don't lecture us on?
 
:lol:
Quote
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #12)
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 02:20 PM
dionysus (21,461 posts)
29. for a self proclaimed reporter, you should be able to spell 'disqualified" correctly.

but maybe you were in a shootout dodging gunfire when you posted that, so i'll give you a pass.
 
Reply to this post
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink
Quote
WI_DEM (28,980 posts)
16. You think it is your duty to inform us uneducated peons about the judicial system?

 
:rotf:

Offline Delmar

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5186
  • Reputation: +524/-40
Quote
Response to permatex (Reply #27)Sat Jul 21, 2012, 02:22 PM
nadinbrzezinski (106,590 posts)
31. I did as well

I also stated I knew way too much to be able to serve in that jury, assuming I lived in the county.

 :rotf:
"I sat down, and I said, 'America's back' and Mitterrand from Germany — I mean from France — looked at me and said … "Well, how long are you back for?"
Crooked Joe Biden

Offline Bad Dog

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5927
  • Reputation: +313/-313
  • God help me I do love it so
I have this vision of Nads announcing from the jury pool that she has too much knowledge to be on the jury.  I expect both prosecution and defense would be fighting over who got to toss her.

Offline dane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1516
  • Reputation: +117/-24
  • http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-ash2/37017
Quote
Oh and it goes without saying,
And yet, she says it.

As to this
Quote
not guilty until found such
as soon as the first shot was fired, the dude was in fact guilty.  DUmmies tend to get this wrong a lot, this presumption of innocence concept.

edited to add this one:
Quote
zappaman (5,472 posts)
41. Schizophrenia?

What about terrorism?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002992093

Oh, don't forget Stochastic Terrorism
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002982043

How many more threads are you going to start on this tragedy telling us how smart you are?
 
« Last Edit: July 21, 2012, 11:53:48 PM by dane »
This too shall pass.

Offline Kyle Ricky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7596
  • Reputation: +614/-1086
Should we add 'Lawyer' to Nad's resume?

Offline Bad Dog

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5927
  • Reputation: +313/-313
  • God help me I do love it so
Should we add 'Lawyer' to Nad's resume?

Farthest I would go is ejected juror.

Offline Kyle Ricky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7596
  • Reputation: +614/-1086
Farthest I would go is ejected juror.

They probably wouldn't even let her in the court house. One look at her would make people think she is a terrorist or something.

Offline Happy Fun Ball

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2840
  • Reputation: +913/-11
Quote
nadinbrzezinski (106,587 posts)

James Holmes is not guilty until found such

Translation: He's a liberal wacko.

Offline obumazombie

  • Siege engine to lib fortresses
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21814
  • Reputation: +1659/-578
  • Last of the great minorities
Can I get a "needless to say" ?
There were only two options for gender. At last count there are at least 12, according to libs. By that standard, I'm a male lesbian.

Offline txradioguy

  • Minister of Propaganda
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18686
  • Reputation: +1291/-1116
  • Rule 39
Translation: He's a liberal wacko.

Exactly.  Once it came out that he's a registered Dem....the "let's not rush to judgment" call will come out.

Especially since it was just a bunch of white folks he killed.

Unlike George Zimmerman who was automatically guilty.   :whatever:
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Creator of the largest Fight Club thread ever!

http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=83285.0

Offline Skul

  • Sometimes I drink water just to surprise my liver
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12475
  • Reputation: +914/-179
  • Chief of the cathouse
Should we add 'Lawyer' to Nad's resume?
Na, real lawyers are smahter den dat.  :-)

Seems a few more at the DUmp are getting tired of her crap.

Then-Chief Justice John Marshall observed, “Between a balanced republic and a democracy, the difference is like that between order and chaos.”

John Adams warned in a letter, “Remember democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet, that did not commit suicide.”

Offline Big Dog

  • ^^Smokes cigars and knows things.
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15581
  • Reputation: +1954/-213
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002990633
 :rotf: :lol: :rotf:

Some great nadinisms there:

OP: I got a sneaky. Made me think of a shart, for some reason. "Do farts have lumps?"

#15: Okie dockie. First cousin to okie dickey.

#40: the jocker. He's my favorite Buttman character!


Government is the negation of liberty.
  -Ludwig von Mises

CAVE FVROREM PATIENTIS.

Offline formerlurker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9692
  • Reputation: +801/-833
I have this vision of Nads announcing from the jury pool that she has too much knowledge to be on the jury.  I expect both prosecution and defense would be fighting over who got to toss her.

She couldn't do it because she would have no access to the google.   It would be altogether too much for her.

Offline formerlurker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9692
  • Reputation: +801/-833
Quote
Star Member zappaman (5,477 posts)
41. Schizophrenia?

View profile
What about terrorism?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002992093

Oh, don't forget Stochastic Terrorism
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002982043

How many more threads are you going to start on this tragedy telling us how smart you are?

 :rofl:

Offline miskie

  • Mailman for the VRWC
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10449
  • Reputation: +1015/-54
  • Make America Great Again. Deport some DUmmies.
I have to give Nads props for consistency this one time -

She also brought out her 'innocent until proven guilty' speech after the breaking of the Zimmerman/Martin issue. Even though most of DU had already tried, sentenced, and executed Zimmerman.

Offline Bad Dog

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5927
  • Reputation: +313/-313
  • God help me I do love it so
I have to give Nads props for consistency this one time -

She also brought out her 'innocent until proven guilty' speech after the breaking of the Zimmerman/Martin issue. Even though most of DU had already tried, sentenced, and executed Zimmerman.

Resist she much.