Author Topic: **VETERAN NEWSFLASH** The "Messiah" Does Not Trust You/ DHS report on leftwing extremists  (Read 5298 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bluesuiter-Retired

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 464
  • Reputation: +20/-17
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/14/federal-agency-warns-of-radicals-on-right/

Yep, if you are a veteran the communist-in-chief has the DHS keeping an eye on you.

Just proves what I, and many others have stated, the dems and libs are ANTI-MILITARY.  They are scared $hitless that those who really support and DEFEND the U.S. Constitution will take them to task for their SOCIALIST leanings.
America - Love It, or LEAVE

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1707/-151
Man, do those bastards piss me off.
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline SSG Snuggle Bunny

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23048
  • Reputation: +2232/-269
  • Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running
Man, do those bastards piss me off.
That's it Little Mister! You're going on the list you pro-gun, federalistic veteran-type, you!
According to the Bible, "know" means "yes."

Offline ironhorsedriver

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 533
  • Reputation: +28/-1
The sheer incompetence of the Wretched Witch running DHS is mind boggling. She, and apparently her senior staff should be fired, immediately! She should also be prosecuted for even attempting to use her office to go after law abiding citizens, just because they disagree with her bosses socialist agenda.

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2222/-127
The sheer incompetence of the Wretched Witch running DHS is mind boggling. She, and apparently her senior staff should be fired, immediately! She should also be prosecuted for even attempting to use her office to go after law abiding citizens, just because they disagree with her bosses socialist agenda.

Seeing as how she lied about how much Tiller the Killer donated to her as governor, she felt obliged to include anti abortion groups into the list of extremists.

Offline rich_t

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7942
  • Reputation: +386/-429
  • TANSTAAFL
Be afraid...  Be very afraid....

There are only about 40+ million vets in the country and most of them probably own guns.

 :evillaugh:
"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of 'liberalism,' they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened." --Norman Thomas, 1944

Offline SSG Snuggle Bunny

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23048
  • Reputation: +2232/-269
  • Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running
Quote
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said she was briefed before the release of a controversial intelligence assessment and that she stands by the report sent to law enforcement that lists veterans as a terrorist risk to the U.S. and defines "rightwing extremism" as including groups opposed to abortion and immigration.

...

"The document on right-wing extremism sent last week by this department´s Office of Intelligence and Analysis is one in an ongoing series of assessments to provide situational awareness to state, local and tribal law enforcement agencies on the phenomenon and trends of violent radicalization in the United States," Ms. Napolitano said in a statement.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/16/napolitano-stands-rightwing-extremism/

 :bird:
According to the Bible, "know" means "yes."

Offline Thor

  • General Ne'er Do Well, Troublemaker & All Around Meanie!!
  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13103
  • Reputation: +362/-297
  • Native Texan & US Navy (ret)
MY LTTE for the local paper:

Quote
In light of the most recent report from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), I am offended! I left Denison some 34 years ago to serve my country. I served USN for some 20 years. I was part of Desert Shield/ Desert Storm and have a firm belief in my country. I am somewhat disgruntled, however, would that small amount of disgruntlement make me a "terrorist"? Apparently. Am I a "right winged radical" just because I believe in the Constitution, that I had sworn to uphold and protect? According to the most recent DHS report, I am. This disturbs me. MY country, the very country that some of have served, has labelled most of us veterans as potential terrorists. I am sickened, appalled, and outraged by how the DHS has painted us veterans with such a broad brush. The DHS has only submitted ONE example in evidence to label us as such, Timothy McVeigh. How many veterans have served this country, have been released from active duty, and just gone on with their lives? Plenty! ONE example out of MILLIONS of veterans is what the DHS has used. What other evidence does the DHS have to submit?

Then, there's the gun issue. Just because one may believe in the Constitution and in particular, the 2nd Amendment, they are labelled as potential "terrorists"? Perhaps just because some of us may not support abortion or believe that illegal immigration should have a stop put to it, again, they,(the DHS), label us as "extremists". Someone needs to rethink their work. And to believe that WE, the PEOPLE, have paid for this politically biased report. Perhaps the DHS needs to follow suit with the State of Missouri, rescind and apologize to us Americans that have served and/or believe in our founding principles!!

Thor
AT1  USN(ret)
Quartermaster VFW Post 2773
Denison, Tx

Any thoughts, additions or corrections??
"The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation."- IBID

I AM your General Ne'er Do Well, Troublemaker & All Around Meanie!!

"Congress has not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but only those specifically enumerated."-Thomas Jefferson

Offline SSG Snuggle Bunny

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23048
  • Reputation: +2232/-269
  • Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running
Good one Thor...maybe work in a reference such as "Timothy McVeigh--not to be confused with the leftist sympathizer Lee Harvey Oswald--..."

Malkin has a good take on it, mirrors your thoughts to a degree:

You might be a “radicalized rightwing extremist” if…
by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 200

What and who exactly are President Obama’s homeland security officials afraid of these days? If you are a member of an active conservative group that opposes abortion, favors strict immigration enforcement, lobbies to protect Second Amendment rights, protests big government, advocates federalism, or represents veterans who believe in any of the above, the answer is: You.

DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano has turned her attention away from acts of Islamic jihad on American soil (which she now refers to as “man-caused disasters”). Instead, her department is sounding the alarm over an un-quantified “resurgence” in “rightwing extremism activity.” On April 7, DHS sent a nine-page warning memo to law enforcement offices across the country titled “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment.”

The report includes a sweeping definition of the threat:

“Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.”

You cannot ignore the context or the timing of this DHS report. It’s no small coincidence that Napolitano’s agency disseminated the assessment just a week before the nationwide April 15 Tax Day Tea Party protests. The grass-roots events organized by fiscal conservatives, independents, Libertarians, and yes, even some blue Dog Democrats were fueled by the “current economic and political climate” of bipartisan profligate spending and endless taxpayer-funded bailouts. The growing success of the loose-knit movement has invited scorn, ridicule, and fear-mongering from Obama’s supporters. Liberal bloggers have likened the Tea Party movement to neo-Nazis, militias, and even Weather Underground terrorists.

These attempts to demonize the Tea Party movement come on the heels of widespread conservative-bashing over the recent shooting sprees in Pittsburgh and Binghamton, New York. Taking Hillary Clinton’s advice to “never waste a good crisis,” left-wing pundits and analysts have blamed the tragedies on everyone from Rush Limbaugh to Fox News to the NRA.

The DHS spokespeople I talked to on Monday insisted that the report was not a politicized document and that DHS had done similar assessments on “leftwing extremism” in the past. But past domestic terrorism reports have always been very specific in identifying security threats – such as the Animal Liberation Front and the Earth Liberation Front – and very specific in identifying their methods and targets, including repeated physical harassment, arson, and vandalism against pharmaceutical companies, farms, labs, and university researchers.

By contrast, the Obama DHS report is an overarching indictment of conservatives. “Rightwing extremist chatter on the Internet continues to focus on the economy, the perceived loss of U.S. jobs in the manufacturing and construction sectors, and home foreclosures,” the assessment warns. When I asked DHS spokeswoman Sara Kuban to explain who was responsible for this “extremist chatter,” she could not and would not name names.

Moreover, the report relies on the work of the left-leaning Southern Poverty Law Center to stir anxiety over “disgruntled military veterans” – a citation which gives us valuable insight into how DHS will define “hate-oriented” groups. The SPLC, you see, has designated the venerable American Legion a “hate group” for its stance on immigration enforcement. The report offers zero data, but states with an almost resentful attitude toward protected free speech: “Debates over appropriate immigration levels and enforcement policy generally fall within the realm of protected political speech under the First Amendment, but in some cases, anti-immigration or strident pro-enforcement fervor has been directed against specific groups and has the potential to turn violent.”

“Potential to turn violent?” So did the hysterical fervor whipped up by Capitol Hill over the AIG bonuses, which prompted ugly death threats from across the country. No mention here, though. Not “rightwing” enough. Nor will you see Obama DHS warnings to police and sheriff’s departments about self-proclaimed bank terrorists such as Bruce Marks of the aggressive Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America or the mob activists of ACORN who have committed burglary, stormed corporate executives’ homes, and vowed to conduct “civil disobedience” by “any means necessary” in response to the “current economic and political climate.”

If you can redefine dissenting opinion as “hate,” you can brand your political opponents as “extremists” – and you can marginalize electoral threats. “Antigovernment?” “Pro-enforcement?” “Disgruntled?” Feeling taxed enough already and “recruiting” and “radicalizing” your friends and neighbors through “chatter on the Internet?”

We are all rightwing extremists now. Welcome to the club.
According to the Bible, "know" means "yes."

Offline YupItsMe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1121
  • Reputation: +135/-6
Oh I see!  It's wrong to use the term terrorist when referring to the Islamofacists camelf@$kers that have pledged to kill us, but it is OK to use that term when referring to Americans who are pro-life or veterans. 



 :banghead:

Offline SSG Snuggle Bunny

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23048
  • Reputation: +2232/-269
  • Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running
Oh I see!  It's wrong to use the term terrorist when referring to the Islamofacists camelf@$kers that have pledged to kill us, but it is OK to use that term when referring to Americans who are pro-life or veterans. 



 :banghead:
Now you're getting it.
According to the Bible, "know" means "yes."

Offline Hawkgirl

  • Alpha Female
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4291
  • Reputation: +186/-73
What a giant cluster**** of an administration.  I don't think even the terrorists hate us as much as these left wing ****tards....

Offline Ree

  • It's Ree...
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1963
  • Reputation: +110/-42
  • 100+ pounds lighter.. Ain't I hot
What a giant cluster**** of an administration.  I don't think even the terrorists hate us as much as these left wing ****tards....
Ya think???:)
In Tennessee. I came down here to get warm,froze my arse off since I got here..
Just my luck... ;-P

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2222/-127
MY LTTE for the local paper:

Any thoughts, additions or corrections??

Provide a link to the pdf or send it as an attachment?

Offline Ptarmigan

  • Bunny Slayer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23532
  • Reputation: +924/-225
  • God Hates Bunnies
The left wing extremists are more dangerous than Islamic terrorists. They need to be dealt with in a harsh and brutal manner.  :bird:
Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.
-Napoleon Bonaparte

Allow enemies their space to hate; they will destroy themselves in the process.
-Lisa Du

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2222/-127
 It's a PDF File.  It's a bunch of BS that really did nothing more than to provide some political cover for the report on on right wing extremists.

Most of the cyber attacks listed could have been prevented/minimized by the affected backing up their files.

The real left wing terrorists reside on college campuses, both as students and professors.

Offline djones520

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4207
  • Reputation: +181/-146
I found a paper written and presented to the Department of Energy back in 2001 yesterday, that is much more descriptive of the threat of Left Wing Extremism.

http://www.osti.gov/bridge/servlets/purl/780410-SHVVvq/native/780410.PDF
"Chuck Norris once had sex in an 18 wheeler. Some of his semen dripped onto the engine. We now call that truck Optimus Prime."

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2222/-127
I found a paper written and presented to the Department of Energy back in 2001 yesterday, that is much more descriptive of the threat of Left Wing Extremism.

http://www.osti.gov/bridge/servlets/purl/780410-SHVVvq/native/780410.PDF

One country kept coming up in that report as a sponsor and safe haven for leftist extremists.  Cuba.  Is it coincidence that 0Bama wants to open ties to them?

Funny thing that most deaths and destruction have come from the left.



Offline Lord Undies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11388
  • Reputation: +639/-250
I read the report, or as much of it as I could stand to read.  It originates from the Blueprint For Liberalism Survival.  Liberalism cannot exist in actual reality, a world of facts, nor a world aware of accurate history.  Since liberalism cannot stand on its own merits, its only hope to survive and thrive is to lie in its attempts to distort and discredit reality, facts , and history.

The Blueprint For Liberalism Survival states that no threat to liberalism is too small to attack with full force.  It also states that when given the opportunity, such as in those brief periods when liberals actually hold some power, no organized smear of reality, facts, and history is too absurd to be made public.  Whatever mud sticks to the wall of the public psyche is a win for liberals, no matter how small the stain.

We've heard a lot this past week about the "right-wing terrorist" Timothy McVeigh.  I believe he was put to death about eight years ago.  McVeigh poses no current threat to anyone.  He is dead.  As he should be.  

But since McVeigh is the only example the left can point to when bleating about "right-wing terrorists", his ghost is being used to its fullest potential.  He's all they have....and we killed him.  

The irony, or tragedy if you will, which should be footnoted every time Timothy McVeigh is mentioned is that William Ayers, one of many-many left-wing murderers/terrorists, still walks free among us, has a high-placed profile in our nation's academia circus, and is a close friend and adviser to the current democrat/liberal president of the United States.  

Offline MrsSmith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5977
  • Reputation: +465/-54
I read the report, or as much of it as I could stand to read.  It originates from the Blueprint For Liberalism Survival.  Liberalism cannot exist in actual reality, a world of facts, nor a world aware of accurate history.  Since liberalism cannot stand on its own merits, its only hope to survive and thrive is to lie in its attempts to distort and discredit reality, facts , and history.

The Blueprint For Liberalism Survival states that no threat to liberalism is too small to attack with full force.  It also states that when given the opportunity, such as in those brief periods when liberals actually hold some power, no organized smear of reality, facts, and history is too absurd to be made public.  Whatever mud sticks to the wall of the public psyche is a win for liberals, no matter how small the stain.

We've heard a lot this past week about the "right-wing terrorist" Timothy McVeigh.  I believe he was put to death about eight years ago.  McVeigh poses no current threat to anyone.  He is dead.  As he should be.  

But since McVeigh is the only example the left can point to when bleating about "right-wing terrorists", his ghost is being used to its fullest potential.  He's all they have....and we killed him.  

The irony, or tragedy if you will, which should be footnoted every time Timothy McVeigh is mentioned is that William Ayers, one of many-many left-wing murderers/terrorists, still walks free among us, has a high-placed profile in our nation's academia circus, and is a close friend and adviser to the current democrat/liberal president of the United States.  
:clap: :clap:
.
.


Antifa - the only fascists in America today.

Offline Thor

  • General Ne'er Do Well, Troublemaker & All Around Meanie!!
  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13103
  • Reputation: +362/-297
  • Native Texan & US Navy (ret)
I read the report, or as much of it as I could stand to read.  It originates from the Blueprint For Liberalism SurvivalSocialist Ideology.  LiberalismSocialism cannot exist in actual reality, a world of facts, nor a world aware of accurate history.  Since liberalismSocialism cannot stand on its own merits, its only hope to survive and thrive is to lie in its attempts to distort and discredit reality, facts , and history.

The Blueprint For Liberalism Survival the institution of Socialism states that no threat to liberalismSocialism is too small to attack with full force.  It also states that when given the opportunity, such as in those brief periods when liberalsSocialists actually hold some power, no organized smear of reality, facts, and history is too absurd to be made public.  Whatever mud sticks to the wall of the public psyche is a win for liberalsSocialists, no matter how small the stain.

We've heard a lot this past week about the "right-wing terrorist" Timothy McVeigh.  I believe he was put to death about eight years ago.  McVeigh poses no current threat to anyone.  He is dead.  As he should be.  

But since McVeigh is the only example the left can point to when bleating about "right-wing terrorists", his ghost is being used to its fullest potential.  He's all they have....and we killed him.  

The irony, or tragedy if you will, which should be footnoted every time Timothy McVeigh is mentioned is that William Ayers, one of many-many left-wing murderers/terrorists, still walks free among us, has a high-placed profile in our nation's academia circus, and is a close friend and adviser to the current democrat/liberal president of the United States.  

Fixed it for you, Undies....

The reason I reworded your sentiments is because our founding Fathers were all "Liberals". The bigger problem is that the left has hijacked the word, "Liberal". By definition, the word "Liberal" means "open to new ideas". It is of certainty that I have concluded that today's "Liberals" are far from that. If anything, they want the Government to run their lives because they cannot. For reference, I give you these definitions:

Quote
4.    favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, esp. as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties.
5.    favoring or permitting freedom of action, esp. with respect to matters of personal belief or expression: a liberal policy toward dissident artists and writers.
6.    of or pertaining to representational forms of government rather than aristocracies and monarchies.
7.    free from prejudice or bigotry; tolerant: a liberal attitude toward foreigners.
8.    open-minded or tolerant, esp. free of or not bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values, etc.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Liberal

As one can see, today's so-called "Liberals" are far from the definition as they would like to believe. Let's call a spade, a spade. They are "Socialists" wanting to impose their ideology on the masses.

By definition, I would consider myself a "Liberal", but definitely NOT in today's terminology.
"The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation."- IBID

I AM your General Ne'er Do Well, Troublemaker & All Around Meanie!!

"Congress has not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but only those specifically enumerated."-Thomas Jefferson

Offline Ptarmigan

  • Bunny Slayer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23532
  • Reputation: +924/-225
  • God Hates Bunnies
I read the report, or as much of it as I could stand to read.  It originates from the Blueprint For Liberalism Survival.  Liberalism cannot exist in actual reality, a world of facts, nor a world aware of accurate history.  Since liberalism cannot stand on its own merits, its only hope to survive and thrive is to lie in its attempts to distort and discredit reality, facts , and history.

The Blueprint For Liberalism Survival states that no threat to liberalism is too small to attack with full force.  It also states that when given the opportunity, such as in those brief periods when liberals actually hold some power, no organized smear of reality, facts, and history is too absurd to be made public.  Whatever mud sticks to the wall of the public psyche is a win for liberals, no matter how small the stain.

We've heard a lot this past week about the "right-wing terrorist" Timothy McVeigh.  I believe he was put to death about eight years ago.  McVeigh poses no current threat to anyone.  He is dead.  As he should be.  

But since McVeigh is the only example the left can point to when bleating about "right-wing terrorists", his ghost is being used to its fullest potential.  He's all they have....and we killed him.  

The irony, or tragedy if you will, which should be footnoted every time Timothy McVeigh is mentioned is that William Ayers, one of many-many left-wing murderers/terrorists, still walks free among us, has a high-placed profile in our nation's academia circus, and is a close friend and adviser to the current democrat/liberal president of the United States.  

Timothy McVeigh wrote a letter decrying slaughter houses. Methinks he is an animal rights activist.
Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.
-Napoleon Bonaparte

Allow enemies their space to hate; they will destroy themselves in the process.
-Lisa Du

Offline Crazy Horse

  • Army 0 Navy 34
  • Topic Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5570
  • Reputation: +236/-143
  • Sex, Booze and Bacon Minion
Fixed it for you, Undies....

The reason I reworded your sentiments is because our founding Fathers were all "Liberals". The bigger problem is that the left has hijacked the word, "Liberal". By definition, the word "Liberal" means "open to new ideas". It is of certainty that I have concluded that today's "Liberals" are far from that. If anything, they want the Government to run their lives because they cannot. For reference, I give you these definitions:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Liberal

As one can see, today's so-called "Liberals" are far from the definition as they would like to believe. Let's call a spade, a spade. They are "Socialists" wanting to impose their ideology on the masses.

By definition, I would consider myself a "Liberal", but definitely NOT in today's terminology.

I agree, but we can't look at our self through history, we've gotta look at out our selves in the here and now.

ps, how's the job, saw an Apache landing Friday
You got off your ass, now get your wife off her back.