Welcome to The Conservative Cave©!Join in the discussion! Click HERE to register.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Wretched Excess on April 22, 2008, 08:49:58 PMHere is the link to the PA secretary of state elections returns page:http://www.electionreturns.state.pa.us/it updates automatically.Oh, shit -- the Ronbots are going to go ape.
Here is the link to the PA secretary of state elections returns page:http://www.electionreturns.state.pa.us/it updates automatically.
Quote from: freedumb2003 on April 22, 2008, 08:51:29 PMQuote from: Wretched Excess on April 22, 2008, 08:49:58 PMHere is the link to the PA secretary of state elections returns page:http://www.electionreturns.state.pa.us/it updates automatically.Oh, shit -- the Ronbots are going to go ape.this is where i usually ask... "Ron Paul is STILL going?"
Okay, 52% in.Messalina up 1, Barry down 1.55%-45%.
I am playing with the county results using the county-by-county map on the PA sec'y state state page, it looks like perhaps the outlying rural areas will be the last to come in. if that is so, and the demographics hold, she could be headed to 12% or better.
Quote from: Wretched Excess on April 22, 2008, 09:15:33 PMI am playing with the county results using the county-by-county map on the PA sec'y state state page, it looks like perhaps the outlying rural areas will be the last to come in. if that is so, and the demographics hold, she could be headed to 12% or better.I was wondering; that's why my question about western Pennsylvania.If western Pennsylvania isn't in yet, Barry's toast.
Sixty-seven percent in; two-thirds of the way there.Messalina inevitably in a rout over Barry, still 54%-46%.However, I do suspect that margin will widen.
Seventy percent now.Messalina still at 54%, Barry 46%.Does anybody know if any of the Obamaite primitives are screaming "vote fraud!" yet?
Quote from: franksolich on April 22, 2008, 09:29:50 PMSixty-seven percent in; two-thirds of the way there.Messalina inevitably in a rout over Barry, still 54%-46%.However, I do suspect that margin will widen.I hope not. I have a bunch of H5s on the line (since I was one of the few who made a specific prediction)
BradBlog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal 08:06 PMResponse to Original message1. OP Updated with much more... Updated at 7:41 PM Kicking to point that out...Will likely be rolling updates all day. Please keep this kicked if you can!-- Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Tue Apr-22-08 08:14 PMResponse to Original message2. kick Nobody could possibly have foreseen....... I'm gettin' tired of saying it.I predicted last night that Hillary would win, 100% to Obama's 55%. That's with a 156% margin of error. With these machines, anything is possible.-- electropop (1000+ posts) Tue Apr-22-08 08:17 PMResponse to Original message3. I can't stand this. How much longer will we use these damned machines? How much longer before we pull the partisans out of running elections? It's disgraceful!-- discerning christian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Wed Apr-23-08 12:42 AMResponse to Reply #339. PULLEEEEEEZE, someone forward this post to K. Olberman at MSNBC right NOW!! I'm sitting here listening to them making excuses as to why the results are so slow in coming in. Even they are being BULLSHITTED. Some one there must "have a clue" yet are keeping America hanging out here to dry!! Also get the information to them about the DOJ monitoring this election. PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE !! Maybe now the powers that be will get rid of those DAMNABLE MACHINES !!! Gov. Rendell needs to have a long talk with the Sec. of State. Can they afford a do-over????????????? Bastards. :nuke:-- truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Tue Apr-22-08 08:25 PMResponse to Original message4. I thought that the state primaries were on paper ballots!?! between the electronic machinery and Ed Weasel Rendell forcing the delegates to go his way or no funding for districts, maybe Hillary will get her 28% above Obama.<sigh>-- Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Tue Apr-22-08 08:55 PMResponse to Reply #48. Yes, it's all true. And there's nothing you can do to stop us!!!! -- natrat (1000+ posts) Journal Tue Apr-22-08 08:39 PMResponse to Original message5. let me guess shillary by 30 -- Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Tue Apr-22-08 08:40 PMResponse to Original message6. Let me guess. Broken machines in Obama strongholds, Obama missing from ballots. So surprising. -- joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Tue Apr-22-08 08:53 PMResponse to Original message7. Yup it's Hilary's fault...the seriousness of these problems denigrated by the Bots trying to make it into another conspiracy theory. Pathetic.-- darue (178 posts) Tue Apr-22-08 09:56 PMResponse to Reply #721. oh for ****s sake... you're so right... why would powerful rich people ever secretly agree to act in concert to accomplish their goals? What lunacy to suggest that they might or EVER HAVE. of course we know our betters would never do such things. republican state election officials have no reason whatsoever to do something that we KNOW they think will help them win the presidency of the most powerful nation on earth. What would even motivate them to try? conspiracy? please, what a joke. there's NEVER been a conspiracy in history has there? Certainly no conspiracy has ever occurred in our perfect and great nation.-- RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Tue Apr-22-08 10:06 PMResponse to Reply #2123. Coming in swinging...sarcasm...on point... Welcome to DU.-- darue (178 posts) Tue Apr-22-08 10:10 PMResponse to Reply #2325. yes a little of the old sarky indeed. thnx 4 the welcome -- Winebrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Tue Apr-22-08 08:56 PMResponse to Original message9. The Dysfunctional States of America -- Faye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Tue Apr-22-08 08:58 PMResponse to Original message10. . -- Obama_for_our_future Donating Member (1000+ posts) Tue Apr-22-08 09:01 PMResponse to Original message11. Kick, those who don't believe these things happen are naive -- defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Wed Apr-23-08 12:51 AMResponse to Reply #1141. ...but, but, but .... that would be a conspiracy . . .. !!! and we would all be wearing "tin foil hats" ---Oh . . . it would be so frightening ---Let's pretend this isn't happening --- it's easier that way!!-- jennied (7 posts) Tue Apr-22-08 09:17 PMResponse to Original message12. Sigh... This makes me mad. I just might close my eyes for a few months, then open them and see who is gonna be our nominee. I can't stand all this crap...-- blackops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Tue Apr-22-08 10:29 PMResponse to Reply #1228. You need Wait Mateâ„¢! Edited on Tue Apr-22-08 10:30 PM by blackopshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJVeHm0QT04&feature=rela...Welcome to DU! :hi:-- The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Tue Apr-22-08 11:41 PMResponse to Reply #2834. Gimme a couple. I can't stand it. -- Progs Rock (1000+ posts) Journal Tue Apr-22-08 09:22 PMResponse to Original message13. kr -- drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Tue Apr-22-08 09:23 PMResponse to Original message14. I voted on one of those damned machines this morning. Edited on Tue Apr-22-08 09:24 PM by drm604This was in Norristown, which should go heavily for Obama. There were no obvious problems, but of course I have no way of knowing whether or not my votes were accurately recorded when I pushed the vote button.-- The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Tue Apr-22-08 09:33 PMResponse to Original message15. Can anyone help? Did Pennsylvania make a verified paper trail illegal for the primary?-- drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Tue Apr-22-08 09:33 PMResponse to Original message16. Here's the machine I voted on. I voted on a "Sequoia Advantage" machine.Here's an instructional video put out by the state of Pennsylvania for that machine (if you can stomach the silly cartoon).http://www.votingbooth.state.pa.us/media/instructional_...-- bushmeister0 (495 posts) Journal Tue Apr-22-08 09:52 PMResponse to Reply #1619. I think I used a somwhat older version of that one. I was a little more rickety. Damn, I wish I'd thought to write in "John Doe." The bass player of the band "X" is so much cooler than anyone running in this primary.-- AllyCat (1000+ posts) Tue Apr-22-08 09:42 PMResponse to Original message17. Is anyone surprised? Anyone? n/t -- truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Tue Apr-22-08 09:46 PMResponse to Original message18. error message -- You have already recommended that discussion -- nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Journal Tue Apr-22-08 09:56 PMResponse to Original message20. ... -- demo dutch (1000+ posts) Tue Apr-22-08 10:02 PMResponse to Original message22. Just the normal crap, it happens in every state of the union! -- truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Tue Apr-22-08 11:28 PMResponse to Reply #2233. No in other states of the Union there were primaries held where The votes were counted on paper ballots.And some states are now going with paper. For even the General Eections.-- Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Tue Apr-22-08 10:07 PMResponse to Original message24. Thanks Brad. :kick:-- ohio2007 (1000+ posts) Tue Apr-22-08 10:11 PMResponse to Original message26. (problems) particularly in and around Philly Philly always had problems going back more then a couple of years now-- Stevepol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Tue Apr-22-08 10:22 PMResponse to Original message27. As reported elsewhere, PA is 85% touchscreen (no paper at all). In other words, almost total faith-based voting, even tho PA state law requires the verification of the vote.-- WIllo Donating Member (421 posts) Journal Tue Apr-22-08 10:38 PMResponse to Original message29. K&R -- vickiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Tue Apr-22-08 10:39 PMResponse to Original message30. Columbus, PA pop. 1700, 2 machines, both down first thing. Paper ballots used for 33 people before 'fixed'. First person could not 'fix' machines, tech person called in. Finally 'fixed' about 8:45am.Not my district, but was until 2003.-- humbled_opinion (1000+ posts) Journal Tue Apr-22-08 11:06 PMResponse to Original message31. Figures... You'd think people would have figured this stuff out by now...-- lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Tue Apr-22-08 11:13 PMResponse to Original message32. Well oh my ****ing dee dee ****ing dee! :eyes:-- chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Tue Apr-22-08 11:52 PMResponse to Original message35. "Machines break down, 100's leave without voting, Obama's name not on provisional ballot!" Edited on Tue Apr-22-08 11:54 PM by chill_wind"I just came from voting. Finally got my vote in at 49 ward, 07 division....after waiting for (the only) 2 voting machines to be repaired."I was able to cast my vote for Obama after waiting 1 and 1/2 hours. During that time at least 100 voters left without voting.....possibly not to return."I immediately called every News channel I could get through to. Persons who answered at the stations informed me that my ward was not the only one with broken machines and 'Paper ballots (as an alternative) without Obama's name on it. These provisional ballots did have Hiliary's name on them."http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/politics/More_voting...http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5918-- Prophet 451 (1000+ posts) Journal Tue Apr-22-08 11:55 PMResponse to Original message36. Well, that was predictable Updated at 5:49 PM Haven't we learned by now that those things are a f'ing nightmare?-- Prophet 451 (1000+ posts) Journal Tue Apr-22-08 11:55 PMResponse to Original message37. Well, that was predictable Updated at 5:49 PM Haven't we learned by now that those things are a f'ing nightmare?-- DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Tue Apr-22-08 11:59 PMResponse to Original message38. The "problem" with e-voting... is that the dipshits forgot to make the shortcomings invisible to us, their rubes. When voters know their votes are being switched, not counted or lost, they tend to get a little irate.Personally, I hope PA is such a debacle that every vote in the GE will be done on a paper ballot, from coast to coast.-- defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Wed Apr-23-08 12:48 AMResponse to Original message40. Looks like they are now engineering the win for HRC . . . 8:47 pm Central NJ . . . ???? -- happygoluckytoyou (837 posts) Wed Apr-23-08 01:04 AMResponse to Original message42. WELCOME TO THE JUNGLE.... HOW JOHN "THE REPUBLICAN" WILL WIN IN 2008 -- trickyguy (43 posts) Wed Apr-23-08 01:43 AMResponse to Original message43. How could I be so naive as to think there wouldn't be any problems. I was so caught up in Obama fever that I forgot about the scumbags out therewho like to ruin things for a lot of honest Americans. Like mess with their votes.And now I'm nervous as hell about the whole primary process.Gotta think positive now. Maybe if I go and do some yoga that would help. :evilfrown:
Something is ****ING WRONG .. CNN VS. STATE Reporting .. One has it wrongAt 54% CNN was reporting H: 54 O: 46 But the state website at: http://www.electionreturns.state.pa.us / is reporting it at: 52.7 (53) H 47.3 (47%) Obama Which ****ing site should I believe now?!!
