Send Us Hatemail ! mailbag@conservativecave.com
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Danascot (1000+ posts) Tue Sep-08-09 08:11 PMOriginal messageWhat will the moonbat crazies lose their minds over next? "The speech" is over, Van Jones is history, healthcare reform is on life support and fading fast. What can a post-dumb rabid right winger get hysterical about next?I've got it! The H1N1 flu vaccinations!Obama will force everyone to get vaccinated!Fake vaccinations for him and his family were just water!Microchips will be secretly implanted with the shots!White people will get sick and die!It will make everyone passive communist sheep!They're massing troops and building prisons for the patriots who refuse to get vaccinated!All this and more; lots & lots more!Get used to it, we'll be hearing about this ad nauseum for months.Party game idea: make your own list and take a drink every time you hear about it on Fox, Free Republic or Limbaugh.
LuvNewcastle (413 posts) Tue Sep-08-09 08:18 PMResponse to Original message4. Immigration reform should be interesting.
DanascotWhat will the moonbat crazies lose their minds over next?
emdee (1000+ posts) Tue Sep-08-09 09:11 PMResponse to Original message 12. Textbooks All throughout the Labor Day weekend, as I flipped through the channel guide, Fox ran a special on "Do You Know What Is In Your Children's Textbooks?"History? Science? I didn't watch the "special" but I think we could all write their manufactured outrages ourselves. But, they are, thankfully, showing just how desperate and crazy they are.I hope they lose many followers as they get crazier & crazier.
There isn't going to be immigration reform with unemployment near 10%, DUmmie.
That was a pretty dumb mistake. Anybody who follows the blogosphere knows that THEY are moonbats, and WE are wingnuts (and proud to be one). Oh yes, immigration will be the next one I bet, not the H1N1.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/09/opinion/09friedman.html?_r=2Has anyone seen this? Wow. I have no words. I cannot bring myself to post it.Hey Thomas Friedman
Can you give us a synopsis? I refuse to let the Times put a cookie on my 'puter and that's the only way you can read their left wing trash!
The New York Times Timeless Romance with Communist DictatorshipsBack while Stalin was energetically butchering people by the millions and starving them by the tens of millions, New York Times Reporter Walter Duranty traveled to the Soviet Union and praised Bolshevik Communism as the future of mankind: "Stalin and his associates have carried with them the strongest and most intelligent elements of the Russian people, and have created a national unity and enthusiasm which the Tsarist Empire never knew. They have learnt by their own errors and pulled themselves up by their own bootstraps, and the nation has followed them."Today, the New York Times's Thomas Friedman has similar praise for the butchers of Beijing. One-party autocracy certainly has its drawbacks. But when it is led by a reasonably enlightened group of people, as China is today, it can also have great advantages. That one party can just impose the politically difficult but critically important policies needed to move a society forward in the 21st century. It is not an accident that China is committed to overtaking us in electric cars, solar power, energy efficiency, batteries, nuclear power and wind power. China’s leaders understand that in a world of exploding populations and rising emerging-market middle classes, demand for clean power and energy efficiency is going to soar. Beijing wants to make sure that it owns that industry and is ordering the policies to do that, including boosting gasoline prices, from the top down.Our one-party democracy is worse....We are "worse" because our elected leaders can't roll over the desires of the common citizenry and enact their grand utopian schemes. Of course, Obama now has one czar, John Holdren, who's a big fan of Chinese-style coercive birth control. And another czar, Mark Lloyd, who's a big fan of state control of the media. And the environmental offices are under committed Gaia-worshiping eco-fascists like Stephen Chu and Carol Browner. So, at least some elements of Friedman's idealized Chinese-style government are in place ideologically speaking.By the way, this is the house that Thomas "Concerned About Resource Depletion, Climate Change, and Social Inequalities" Friedman lives in.
Thomas Friedman basically says China has a better government and its more "enlightened". Because it doesn't have factions and protests and disagreements. Yes, Friedman says China has a better government system.
Sure, China is a DUmmy's dream gov...babies are aborted by government decision; "right wing-nuts" are tossed in prison, and then have their organs harvested; there are no "threats" of theocracy from fundie Christofascists; and "no one has more than anyone else," unless they really deserve it.
