Well, I’m back now, but was on the road all night long, and so I’ll be back and involved later today, Monday.
But I wanted to say that while I was gone, I thought a great deal about the primitives, in particular million-dollar Skippy and California Peggy’s degradation of someone ostensibly important to her; I’ll reply on the other thread too.
Anyway.
I think Skippy’s tale is full of holes.
I have no idea where those holes are, but there’s holes in it.
One has to remember that Skippy has a passionate interest in making Obozo look competent, and so he’s probably not above lying, to do it. Remember his mentality; even if people have to suffer and even die just to make Obozo look good, well, then people have to suffer and die.
Skippy’s got his, so he doesn’t care if anybody else doesn’t have his.
- - - - - - - - - -
And so here we come to the basis of franksolich’s cynical skepticism about Skippy’s tale…..
How is it possible for anyone who had medical insurance
before Obozocare, to have even better medical insurance now that Obozocare’s arrived?
Especially desk-sitting governmental employees who
used to have top-of-the-line medical insurance, courtesy the taxpayers?
It seems to me everybody who had medical insurance
before Obozocare, has seen a deterioration in that coverage; higher premiums, higher deductibles, less coverage, fewer choices, &c., &c., &c.
I haven’t yet heard of
anyone whose medical insurance has improved since Obozocare came into force; it seems those once-sterling policies are now hardly even brass or tin.
I think Skippy’s lying about how good his coverage really is—and he’ll lie, to make Obozo look good—but I’m not sure
exactly where he’s lying.
<<<given time, will find the holes in the story.
