Recruitment and retention is going to take a massive hit (true, it did get reversed, but not before the public outrage).
Broken Promise
Plus, the Army is about to publish a new regulation on Wear and Appearance of the Uniform. Nothing abnormal about that, except that this is PUNITIVE. Meaning you can face legal punishment if you don't get a haircut. And then don't get a haircut three times, they can kick you out. And they've stated PUBLICLY that they are going to use this regulation to drawdown the force.
I read up on that and am shaking my head.
Since when is an Army regulation NOT punitive if it's not followed? What kind of bullshit has AR 670-1 been up till now? The way it sounds, having to get haircuts and keeping mustaches a certain length, and wear of various uniform items was all optional. What kind of recourse did the commander have when he had a dirtbag who refused to buck up and fly right? (Besides a blanket party (blanket owners unknown, of course), which smacks of hazing these days and probably gets the commander fired.)
AFAIC, the tattoo thing has gotten completely out of control. I utterly fail to see what's remotely positive about self-mutilation to the point where somebody has to have a tattoo on his face, neck, hands, and probably on the head of his dick. But I digress.