Yes it does.

[CC27]

onecaliberal

Yes it does.
DEAR WHITE PEOPLE
IT TAKES A LOT OF WHITE PRIVILEGE BALLS TO STAND ON THIS STOLEN AND OCCUPIED CONTINENT AND COMPLAIN ABOUT IMMIGRATION.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100219771662

All in caps huh? 🙄

[FlippyDoo]

onecaliberal

Yes it does.
DEAR WHITE PEOPLE
IT TAKES A LOT OF WHITE PRIVILEGE BALLS TO STAND ON THIS STOLEN AND OCCUPIED CONTINENT AND COMPLAIN ABOUT IMMIGRATION.

I'm glad that this idiot brought this up, but it has not provided the points it thinks it has. Let me explain...

Back 25 or 30 years, I was going to buy a business. I'd worked out a price with the current owner. I made an appointment with a Small Business Administration rep because I'd never done anything like buying a business before and needed to know the best way to obtain financing. The SBA rep told me that it would be best if my wife bought the business instead of me. When I asked the rep to explain since my wife did not have any experience in the field while I had over a decade, she told me this, "Although you have experience, you are a white male and are therefore less likely to be able to get a loan. You're wife, although she is white and does not have any experience, is a female which qualifies her as a minority which means she will be much more likely to be approved for a loan." Okay, tell me where my alleged "white privilege" benefited me here. Also for your consideration, almost every single bi-racial person, even the ones who can pass for white, choose to identify as black. If "white privilege" really is a real thing, why would anyone who could pass as white instead choose to identify as black? The answer, even though you will never admit it, is that white privilege does not exist.

Now let's deal with the immigrant portion of your proof of your ignorance...

The indians or native Americans are not actually native. They came here from elsewhere. Yes, they immigrated here. While the US government did indeed do them wrong on many occasions (which is one of the many proofs that the demonrat desire for a strong mommy state government is stupid), life here before the "white man" came wasn't the peaceful utopia that the left would like to believe. The Indians fought and warred among themselves just like all peoples. Regardless of that, let's say Indians back in the 1600s could see into the future, do you think they would have allowed open access to the white folks? Or would they have strongly fought to keep them out? The logical answer would be that they would fight to keep them out because, even though the demonrats are too stupid too see it or too dishonest to admit it, history shows that if you allow unfettered immigration you open yourself up to potential doom.

Oh, I don't think the all caps thing is effective unless you use a ton of exclamation points also.

[jukin]

Dear DUmbass DUchebag onecaliberal,

Please suck a wet greasy turd out of my White asshole.

Sincerely

Jukin

[Delmar]

I saw that President Trump got 65% of the American Indian vote--that's better than he did with the "WHITE PEOPLE".

Put that in your peace pipe and smoke it, onecaliberal.

[SVPete]

onecaliberal

Yes it does.
DEAR WHITE PEOPLE
IT TAKES A LOT OF WHITE PRIVILEGE BALLS TO STAND ON THIS STOLEN AND OCCUPIED CONTINENT AND COMPLAIN ABOUT IMMIGRATION.

1. Are you leaving now? Or staying and being a hypocrite, proclaiming one thing but doing the opposite.

2. Contrary to the noble savage myth, many/most native American tribes were frequently at war with each other, invading and even conquering each other's claimed territory. E.G., the Lib/Prog-revered Iroquois League was partly a military alliance against another group of tribes. The histories, what can be pieced together, of the Sioux and Apache have similar territorial conquests. Then there's the Aztecs ...

So Native Americans did not have any real concept of fixed territories in their dealings and warfare with each other. Seen that way, whites were just another tribe who unknowingly brought diseases for which Native Americans had no immunity (I've read that up to 80% of the Pre-Columbian indigenous peoples' population was killed by those diseases) and had cultures and technologies that in some ways were better. The only real difference between indigenous tribes taking territory from each other and whites doing the same is that the whites were successful.

[enslaved1]

What was the legal immigration process to the Americas in the 16 and 1700s?  As much as moonbats leave the word out, we are complaining about ILLEGAL immigration (all caps to help the lurkers). 

[SVPete]

What was the legal immigration process to the Americas in the 16 and 1700s?  As much as moonbats leave the word out, we are complaining about ILLEGAL immigration (all caps to help the lurkers).

Since North American indigenous peoples did not have writing, maybe they used smoke signals?

[landofconfusion80]

Since North American indigenous peoples did not have writing, maybe they used smoke signals?

The immigration officials were Indians so they'd declare your citizenship and suddenly take it away

[CollectivismMustDie]

Since North American indigenous peoples did not have writing, maybe they used smoke signals?

Fauxcahontis warren might know...