http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2741275I dunno.
I didn't see the debates, but if Messalina Agrippina came out swinging with boxing gloves on, it must have been great. Messalina Agrippina's got to do more of that.
Anyway.
rsmith6621 (1000+ posts) Tue Jan-22-08 09:14 AM
Original message
In a nutshell: Edwards stomped Obama and Hillary last night!
.....he exposed them for what they are.......DLCers.
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Tue Jan-22-08 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Actually, the only reason he won is because no one needs to pay attention to him. If he were in the running, they would have been all over him because of his complete reversal of everything he ever voted for as a Senator.
book_worm (1000+ posts) Tue Jan-22-08 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #1]
3. he came in second in Iowa and the media made a very deliberate decision at that point to protect the candidate who came in third--Hillary and ignored Edwards.
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Tue Jan-22-08 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yes, astonishing wasn't it? Even fairly well informed people think Clinton came in second in Iowa.
You really had to read between lines in that coverage.
burythehatchet (1000+ posts) Tue Jan-22-08 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. See the connection between Mark Penn and the US Chamber of Commerce.
its sickening
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Tue Jan-22-08 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. well, it was by what...3 10ths of a percent?
Fridays Child (1000+ posts) Tue Jan-22-08 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. They did a pretty good job of exposing each other, too.
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Tue Jan-22-08 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. LOL, I just saw Matt Lauer mention him positively in a discussion with Timbo.
Timbo then explained well, yeah, but see that helps Obama, and then right back to the Obama/Clinton saga.
I guess the MSM can only ignore him if he doesn't actually get seen speaking or campaigning.
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Tue Jan-22-08 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. Edwards is a DLCer (not Obama). You really need to do better research.
Justyce (1000+ posts) Tue Jan-22-08 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. The DLC cut Edwards out - they don't like what he's saying.
Blue State Native (1000+ posts) Tue Jan-22-08 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. So do you, apparently.
dmordue (1000+ posts) Tue Jan-22-08 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. Because he stayed on message
Now, I'm somewhat, uh, skeptical of the primitives, especially since they have Pedro Picasso as their media analyst.
Anybody watch this debate?
Did Edwards win it, or did someone else really win it?