Author Topic: primitives claim John Edwards won debate last night  (Read 2836 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58694
  • Reputation: +3069/-173
primitives claim John Edwards won debate last night
« on: January 22, 2008, 09:07:09 AM »
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2741275

I dunno.

I didn't see the debates, but if Messalina Agrippina came out swinging with boxing gloves on, it must have been great.  Messalina Agrippina's got to do more of that.

Anyway.

Quote
rsmith6621 (1000+ posts)      Tue Jan-22-08 09:14 AM
Original message
In a nutshell: Edwards stomped Obama and Hillary last night!
 
.....he exposed them for what they are.......DLCers.

Quote
Evergreen Emerald  (1000+ posts)       Tue Jan-22-08 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
 
1. Actually, the only reason he won is because no one needs to pay attention to him. If he were in the running, they would have been all over him because of his complete reversal of everything he ever voted for as a Senator.

Quote
book_worm  (1000+ posts)      Tue Jan-22-08 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #1]
 
3. he came in second in Iowa and the media made a very deliberate decision at that point to protect the candidate who came in third--Hillary and ignored Edwards.

Quote
BleedingHeartPatriot  (1000+ posts)       Tue Jan-22-08 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
 
5. Yes, astonishing wasn't it? Even fairly well informed people think Clinton came in second in Iowa.

You really had to read between lines in that coverage.

Quote
burythehatchet  (1000+ posts)       Tue Jan-22-08 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
 
10. See the connection between Mark Penn and the US Chamber of Commerce.

its sickening

Quote
Evergreen Emerald  (1000+ posts)       Tue Jan-22-08 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
 
11. well, it was by what...3 10ths of a percent?

Quote
Fridays Child  (1000+ posts)       Tue Jan-22-08 09:17 AM
Response to Original message

2. They did a pretty good job of exposing each other, too.

Quote
BleedingHeartPatriot  (1000+ posts)       Tue Jan-22-08 09:21 AM
Response to Original message

4. LOL, I just saw Matt Lauer mention him positively in a discussion with Timbo.

Timbo then explained well, yeah, but see that helps Obama, and then right back to the Obama/Clinton saga.

I guess the MSM can only ignore him if he doesn't actually get seen speaking or campaigning.

Quote
Skwmom (1000+ posts)      Tue Jan-22-08 09:24 AM
Response to Original message

6. Edwards is a DLCer (not Obama). You really need to do better research.

Quote
Justyce  (1000+ posts)      Tue Jan-22-08 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #6

8. The DLC cut Edwards out - they don't like what he's saying.

Quote
Blue State Native  (1000+ posts)       Tue Jan-22-08 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #6

9. So do you, apparently.

Quote
dmordue (1000+ posts)     Tue Jan-22-08 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
 
7. Because he stayed on message

Now, I'm somewhat, uh, skeptical of the primitives, especially since they have Pedro Picasso as their media analyst.

Anybody watch this debate?

Did Edwards win it, or did someone else really win it?
apres moi, le deluge

Offline Wretched Excess

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15284
  • Reputation: +485/-84
  • Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happy Hour
Re: primitives claim John Edwards won debate last night
« Reply #1 on: January 22, 2008, 09:34:06 AM »
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2741275

I dunno.

I didn't see the debates, but if Messalina Agrippina came out swinging with boxing gloves on, it must have been great.  Messalina Agrippina's got to do more of that.

Anyway.

Quote
rsmith6621 (1000+ posts)      Tue Jan-22-08 09:14 AM
Original message
In a nutshell: Edwards stomped Obama and Hillary last night!
 
.....he exposed them for what they are.......DLCers.

Quote
Evergreen Emerald  (1000+ posts)       Tue Jan-22-08 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
 
1. Actually, the only reason he won is because no one needs to pay attention to him. If he were in the running, they would have been all over him because of his complete reversal of everything he ever voted for as a Senator.

Quote
book_worm  (1000+ posts)      Tue Jan-22-08 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #1]
 
3. he came in second in Iowa and the media made a very deliberate decision at that point to protect the candidate who came in third--Hillary and ignored Edwards.

Quote
BleedingHeartPatriot  (1000+ posts)       Tue Jan-22-08 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
 
5. Yes, astonishing wasn't it? Even fairly well informed people think Clinton came in second in Iowa.

You really had to read between lines in that coverage.

Quote
burythehatchet  (1000+ posts)       Tue Jan-22-08 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
 
10. See the connection between Mark Penn and the US Chamber of Commerce.

its sickening

Quote
Evergreen Emerald  (1000+ posts)       Tue Jan-22-08 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
 
11. well, it was by what...3 10ths of a percent?

Quote
Fridays Child  (1000+ posts)       Tue Jan-22-08 09:17 AM
Response to Original message

2. They did a pretty good job of exposing each other, too.

Quote
BleedingHeartPatriot  (1000+ posts)       Tue Jan-22-08 09:21 AM
Response to Original message

4. LOL, I just saw Matt Lauer mention him positively in a discussion with Timbo.

Timbo then explained well, yeah, but see that helps Obama, and then right back to the Obama/Clinton saga.

I guess the MSM can only ignore him if he doesn't actually get seen speaking or campaigning.

Quote
Skwmom (1000+ posts)      Tue Jan-22-08 09:24 AM
Response to Original message

6. Edwards is a DLCer (not Obama). You really need to do better research.

Quote
Justyce  (1000+ posts)      Tue Jan-22-08 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #6

8. The DLC cut Edwards out - they don't like what he's saying.

Quote
Blue State Native  (1000+ posts)       Tue Jan-22-08 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #6

9. So do you, apparently.

Quote
dmordue (1000+ posts)     Tue Jan-22-08 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
 
7. Because he stayed on message

Now, I'm somewhat, uh, skeptical of the primitives, especially since they have Pedro Picasso as their media analyst.

Anybody watch this debate?

Did Edwards win it, or did someone else really win it?

I watched all of it until it turned into a therapy session.  edwards got his ass handed to him.  the BarackStar was rather good, and hillary was aggressive.  edwards came off whiney and effeminate, which is probably why the DUmmies think he won.

Offline Splashdown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6729
  • Reputation: +475/-100
  • Out of 9 lives, I spent 7
Re: primitives claim John Edwards won debate last night
« Reply #2 on: January 22, 2008, 10:12:11 AM »

I watched all of it until it turned into a therapy session.  edwards got his ass handed to him.  the BarackStar was rather good, and hillary was aggressive.  edwards came off whiney and effeminate, which is probably why the DUmmies think he won.


Great line! Agreed. Edwards trying to be "above it all" made him seem wimpier than he already is. Although when he piled on, he piled on Barack and not Hillary, it seemed to me.
Let nothing trouble you,
Let nothing frighten you. 
All things are passing;
God never changes.
Patience attains all that it strives for.
He who has God lacks nothing:
God alone suffices.
--St. Theresa of Avila



"No crushed ice; no peas." -- Undies

Offline Wretched Excess

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15284
  • Reputation: +485/-84
  • Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happy Hour
Re: primitives claim John Edwards won debate last night
« Reply #3 on: January 22, 2008, 10:17:54 AM »

I watched all of it until it turned into a therapy session.  edwards got his ass handed to him.  the BarackStar was rather good, and hillary was aggressive.  edwards came off whiney and effeminate, which is probably why the DUmmies think he won.


Great line! Agreed. Edwards trying to be "above it all" made him seem wimpier than he already is. Although when he piled on, he piled on Barack and not Hillary, it seemed to me.

honestly, edwards makes me want to puke.  I don't even have any of the grudging respect for him that I have for the BarackStar or the Hildebeast.  he is a non-entity.  he isn't a has-been, he is a never was.

 

Offline RightCoast

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3438
  • Reputation: +185/-24
  • Semper Fi means more than most will ever know
Re: primitives claim John Edwards won debate last night
« Reply #4 on: January 22, 2008, 08:13:11 PM »
Edwardo will retire from the race soon and I believe he will endorse one of the Clinton's.
nine eleven is a car
nine one one is an emergency service
September 11, 2001 was an attack
Never Forget, or Minimize.

Offline miskie

  • Mailman for the VRWC
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10449
  • Reputation: +1015/-54
  • Make America Great Again. Deport some DUmmies.
Re: primitives claim John Edwards won debate last night
« Reply #5 on: January 23, 2008, 07:09:14 AM »

I watched all of it until it turned into a therapy session.  edwards got his ass handed to him.  the BarackStar was rather good, and hillary was aggressive.  edwards came off whiney and effeminate, which is probably why the DUmmies think he won.


If Edwards were to dye his hair black, and comb it over one of his eyes, he could run for the Emo party.