Send Us Hatemail ! mailbag@conservativecave.com
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Effete Snob (1,106 posts)https://www.democraticunderground.com/100215924511Lin Wood claims 'no plane fragments found' at 9/11 target siteshttps://news.yahoo.com/lin-wood-claims-no-plane-202900650.htmlWood went on to discuss the World Trade Center towers that were struck by planes, saying, "What appeared to be a plane hit one building, what appeared to be a plane hit another building, then later that night another building fell down. It wasn't hit by a dadgum thing."Wood also claimed that the fall of the WTC 7 building, which came hours after the fall of the towers due to flames inside the tower, was where "the papers were about the missing money," the attorney added, referring to alleged "stolen" and "missing" money from the U.S. Defense budget.Wood alleged the Pentagon "got hit by a missile" and said, "There were no plane fragments found at any of the sites — New York, Pennsylvania, the Pentagon." Wood suggests that the footage from the incident is fabricated, despite evidence of plane wreckage from the WTC attacks existing in the New York State Museum and evidence of wreckage from the Flight 93 crash in Pennsylvania.
snowybirdie (3,319 posts) 5. Whydo folks keep posting the ridiculous musings of the crazies surrounding rtump? They are nothings and don't deserve any platform. It just serves to rev up the liberal/progressive folks. Basically clickbait.
Star Member essaynnc (426 posts) 7. I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but.....I've always wanted to know why world trade 7 fell on 9/11. I know nothing about Pentagon money, But what the hell happened? A small fire on the ground floor of a large office building does not cause the whole thing to fall on its tracks.I'm sure there's lots of Q conspiracy theories in this one!!!
Star Member essaynnc (426 posts)7. I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but.....I've always wanted to know why world trade 7 fell on 9/11. I know nothing about Pentagon money, But what the hell happened? A small fire on the ground floor of a large office building does not cause the whole thing to fall on its tracks.I'm sure there's lots of Q conspiracy theories in this one!!!
snowybirdie (3,319 posts)5. Whydo folks keep posting the ridiculous musings of the crazies surrounding rtump? They are nothings and don't deserve any platform. It just serves to rev up the liberal/progressive folks. Basically clickbait.
Some enterprising individual needs to break out the chickenwire and cinder blocks and put this matter to rest, with SCIENCE.
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 05:31 PMOriginal messageCan a jet fuel/hydrocarbon fire collapse a steel structure? An experiment.Advertisements [?]Edited on Wed Oct-05-05 06:29 PM by spooked911I set up the following experiment using steel rabbit fencing as the steel structure supporting a heavy cement block.Note, this fencing is easily bendable, has no significant rigidity, and was not reinforced in any way. The fencing was bent into an outer square and an inner rectangle (the core):Just inside where the gash was made in the outer wall, I placed a cup of kerosene (jet fuel), and there was newspaper around the bottom on the structure.Then I put a heavy cement block on top, weighing about 15 pounds. I don't think the wire structure would hold more than three of these blocks, so the "safety factor" was not particularly high.In a second experiment, I used the same wire fence and block set up, but increased the amount of "airplane damage", added in newspaper all around the inside of the structure, and soaked everything thoroughly with kerosene. In this expt, the fire was more intense and lasted significantly longer, but... the structure held up just fine. (Sorry no pictures of this one).What I conclude is that a fairly flimsy steel structure does not distort and bend and collapse very easily from a simple hydrocarbon fire. And thus, it is not clear why the much stronger steel columns in the WTC towers weakened so much from fires that the towers underwent global collapse.If kerosene/jet fuel/hydrocarbon fires can indeed cause steel structures to collapse, it should be quite simple to show this in an experiment-- right?
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 08:43 PMOriginal messageEnough nonsense here-- the WTC towers were nukedThe extreme pulverization of the towers and China syndrome aftermath prove it.There are many indications that 9/11 was an inside job, but the single most pertinent fact of that day was the use of small nuclear bombs to destroy the WTC.All honest 9/11 researchers should realize this
That latter thread is interesting. Even 7 years into the Troofer BS there were still some DUpipo who defended that incoherent crapola, .
