The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: BannedFromDU on October 10, 2021, 07:08:19 PM
-
15 people shot by three men. (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10077599/15-people-shot-woman-20s-killed-shooting-bar-St-Paul-Minnesota.html)
Here's a clue: the shooter's names are: Terry Lorenzo Brown, Jr.; Devondre Trevon Phillips, and Jeffrey Orlando Hoffman, 32.
I mean, these three people had guns in their possession, so they MUST be gun-humpin', card-carrying NRA members who showed up in a jacked-up F150 to kill black people, right?
You'd THINK such a story would make it to DU given threads like this, which is current on DU:
Dirty Socialist (2,295 posts)
A Well Regulated Militia
Gun humpers tell me that the 2nd Amendment covers all guns. Connie constitutional “experts” have also argued that. Like a fool, I took their word for it. But I finally decided to read the amendment. It CLEARLY STATES the amendment is for militias.
“A well regulated militia, necessary for the security of the state, the right to bear arms shall not be infringed.” That’s it. Finis. Nowhere does it mention regular citizens, hunters, or white men with small penises. I have just realized yet another massive Connie hoodwink.
I'm sure these three will be excoriated on DU ANY minute now, but on the other hand I won't hold my breath. (https://www.democraticunderground.com/100215938806)
-
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
“A well regulated militia, necessary for the security of the state, the right to bear arms shall not be infringed.” That’s it. Finis. Nowhere does it mention regular citizens, hunters, or white men with small penises.
DUmmies always lie, even to other DUmmies.
-
15 people shot by three men. (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10077599/15-people-shot-woman-20s-killed-shooting-bar-St-Paul-Minnesota.html)
Here's a clue: the shooter's names are: Terry Lorenzo Brown, Jr.; Devondre Trevon Phillips, and Jeffrey Orlando Hoffman, 32.
I mean, these three people had guns in their possession, so they MUST be gun-humpin', card-carrying NRA members who showed up in a jacked-up F150 to kill black people, right?
You'd THINK such a story would make it to DU given threads like this, which is current on DU:
I'm sure these three will be excoriated on DU ANY minute now, but on the other hand I won't hold my breath. (https://www.democraticunderground.com/100215938806)
Amish.
Clearly, they're Radicalized Amish.
-
Once again, if it only means guns for the militia, then why didn’t the founding fathers demand that citizens turn in their guns when the Bill of Rights was made law? Shouldn’t Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr have been arrested for possessing pistols illegally?
They never answer these types of questions.
.
-
Just another nonsensical left-wing commentary that doesn't consider the language of the time period in which the 2nd Amendment was written.
Just who the hell do they think was supposed to make up the militia?
-
Black lives matter only when a cracker is involved. when it's black on black it's just a cultural thing. :thatsright:
-
15 people shot by three men. (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10077599/15-people-shot-woman-20s-killed-shooting-bar-St-Paul-Minnesota.html)
Here's a clue: the shooter's names are: Terry Lorenzo Brown, Jr.; Devondre Trevon Phillips, and Jeffrey Orlando Hoffman, 32.
I mean, these three people had guns in their possession, so they MUST be gun-humpin', card-carrying NRA members who showed up in a jacked-up F150 to kill black people, right?
...
I'm sure these three will be excoriated on DU ANY minute now, but on the other hand I won't hold my breath. (https://www.democraticunderground.com/100215938806)
Not even if they had truck nuts.
Not only did the shooters have the wrong skin color to get DU attention, it happened in St. Paul, MN, neighbor city to police-defunding Minneapolis.
The FFs realized that a populace with people familiar with shooting, loading, and cleaning guns would save a militia a lot of time training militia members. Keeping and bearing arms was a recognized right - not a right given! - of the people, not states or any other level of government.
-
Black lives matter only when a cracker is involved. when it's black on black it's just a cultural thing. :thatsright:
Clearly the solution to the gun problem in the US is to take rifles away from people who keep them in locked cabinets. These young black men are just casual gun enthusiasts who never mean or cause any harm.
-
Sun Oct 10, 2021, 09:23 AM
Dirty Socialist (2,295 posts)
A Well Regulated Militia
Gun humpers tell me that the 2nd Amendment covers all guns. Connie constitutional “experts” have also argued that. Like a fool, I took their word for it. But I finally decided to read the amendment. It CLEARLY STATES the amendment is for militias.
“A well regulated militia, necessary for the security of the state, the right to bear arms shall not be infringed.” That’s it. Finis. Nowhere does it mention regular citizens, hunters, or white men with small penises. I have just realized yet another massive Connie hoodwink.
It took me a while to figure it out but Connie must be this primitive's nickname for a conservative--That's a new one on me. Maybe that's what conservatives are routinely called on Earth2, where the constitution makes no mention of the rights of the people and Hillary Clinton is serving her second glorious term.
-
15 people shot by three men. (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10077599/15-people-shot-woman-20s-killed-shooting-bar-St-Paul-Minnesota.html)
Here's a clue: the shooter's names are: Terry Lorenzo Brown, Jr.; Devondre Trevon Phillips, and Jeffrey Orlando Hoffman, 32.
I mean, these three people had guns in their possession, so they MUST be gun-humpin', card-carrying NRA members who showed up in a jacked-up F150 to kill black people, right?
You'd THINK such a story would make it to DU given threads like this, which is current on DU:
I'm sure these three will be excoriated on DU ANY minute now, but on the other hand I won't hold my breath. (https://www.democraticunderground.com/100215938806)
All three were arrested, not gunned down, which breaks another DUmp narrative, so it must be ignored.
-
All three were arrested, not gunned down, which breaks another DUmp narrative, so it must be ignored.
The kid who just shot up a school got out on bond, and those a-holes in that recent gunfight DIDN'T EVEN FACE CHARGES. I don't ever want to hear about Roof's hamburger ever again.
-
The kid who just shot up a school got out on bond, and those a-holes in that recent gunfight DIDN'T EVEN FACE CHARGES. I don't ever want to hear about Roof's hamburger ever again.
Considering Roof was extradited from another state to SC, feeding him while in transit was appropriate.
-
Considering Roof was extradited from another state to SC, feeding him while in transit was appropriate.
You know that and I know that. Every liberal in the world pulls that out of their ass when discussing crime and race, however.
-
Dirty Socialist (2,295 posts)
Well Regulated Militia
Gun humpers tell me that the 2nd Amendment covers all guns. Connie constitutional “experts” have also argued that. Like a fool, I took their word for it. But I finally decided to read the amendment. It CLEARLY STATES the amendment is for militias.
“A well regulated militia, necessary for the security of the state, the right to bear arms shall not be infringed.” That’s it. Finis. Nowhere does it mention regular citizens, hunters, or white men with small penises. I have just realized yet another massive Connie hoodwink.
Dearest DUmmy,
In order to properly understand what it is that you're so feebly attempting to understand (and failing), one must read the preamble to tbe bill of rights (be honest, DUmmy, you didn't even know that the bill of rights had a preamble, did you?):
"THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution."
In short, the second amendment authorizes nothing, and restricts only government.
Your first mistake is thinking that protected fundamental constitutional rights have something to do with them being authorized or allowed by government.
That isn't how a negative charter of liberties works.
-
Dirty Socialist
Explains a lot....