redgiant (92 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct-27-11 04:34 PM
Original message
Ethics of a general strike
If a general strike is effective in largely shutting down the economic activity in a city (highly unlikely, but let's assume), it means that hundreds, if not thousands of workers won't be able to work even if they don't want to participate in the strike. This might be because transportation is shut down or the businesses they work for are unable to operate normally. Loss of a day's pay would likely result.
What are the ethics of essentially conscripting the unwilling to participate in a general strike?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x2197295I doubt half a dozen moonbats "striking" on Friday will even be noticed by most people.
I think it's cute that you think that a general strike is actually going to shut down anything.
villager (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct-27-11 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. What are the ethics of keeping our economy "running" the way it currently is?
We can fix that on Jan 20th, 2013.
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct-27-11 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Not a separate issue at all in fact it is the entire point. If the system is bad enough then
Edited on Thu Oct-27-11 04:57 PM by Exultant Democracy
not taking part in it is the most ethical thing you can do. To someone partaking in a general strike the issues you bring up do not matter and from a moral stand point should not matter according to this justification.
If the cause is just and the system is unjust, then the top 1% in power are responsible for the fallout of the general strike. Blaming those on strike is just blaming the victim.
Yeah you all suffer so bad living in this country.
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct-27-11 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Unemployment is over 10% officially. Likely closer to15%
in reality.
People have very little to lose any more.
I could have sworn that we were supposed to be celebrating that 0bama has decreased unemployment down to 9.0%.
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct-27-11 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
22. The point is that the general strike says "Without us, you can't function"
That people not willing to participate can't function is their own problem.
Yeah because God knows that society will collapse overnight if a bunch of chronically unemployed hippies "strike".
For everyone of you jackwagons that "strike" there are probably 10 people willing to take your job and work for the man. These people are commonly known as grownups, they work so they can provide for themselves even if it isn't their dream job.
I really think they are so cute, thinking that they are going to bring the 1% to their knees tomorrow.