Author Topic: Speculators in Commodities  (Read 1826 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Speculators in Commodities
« on: May 22, 2008, 10:22:05 PM »
Interesting chain email, that was sent to me.  Rather obvious for the most part, but a few interesting bits to say the least

Yesterday, former commodity’s trader Michael Masters testified in front of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security about the primary cause of high commodity prices: speculators. You likely won’t see this in the MSM.

Here is the link to his testimony:

http://hsgac.senate.gov/public/_files/052008Masters.pdf

Masters lays out a simple and compelling case that illustrates how over $250Bn of speculative money has poured into the commodities markets since 2003, driving the average cost of commodities indexed up 183% WITHOUT ANY SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN ACTUAL DEMAND.

"What we are experiencing is a demand shock coming from a new category of participant in the commodities futures markets: Institutional Investors. Specifically, these are Corporate and Government Pension Funds, Sovereign Wealth Funds, University Endowments and other Institutional Investors. Collectively, these investors now account on average for a larger share of outstanding commodities futures contracts than any other market participant."

It’s not just oil, there is a chart on page 4 of his presentation that shows how on Jan 1st 2003 sugar futures stockpiled totaled 2.3Bn pounds. On March 12th of this year, speculators had stockpiled 48Bn pounds of sugar. Soybean oil went from 163M pounds to 4.5Bn pounds, corn from 242M bushels to 2.4Bn bushels, coffee from 195M pounds to 2.4Bn pounds. wheat from 166M bushels to 1.1Bn bushels. Even cattle and hogs have had 10-fold increases in speculation. This is your "demand," 10 month supplies of commodities removed from the markets over 5 years and held by speculators who point to the "demand" as evidence of a tight supply.

Speculators "consumed" as much additional oil as China in the past 5 years (848M barrels) while gasoline stockpiles have risen from 1.1Bn gallons to 3.5Bn gallons and natural gas stored by speculators has gone up from 331M BTUs to an insane 2.3 Billion BTUs. Aluminum - 10x, Nickel - 5x, Zinc - 10x, Copper - 7x, Gold - 10x, Silver - 15x.

"In fact, Index Speculators have now stockpiled, via the futures market, the equivalent of 1.1 billion barrels of petroleum, effectively adding eight times as much oil to their own stockpile as the United States has added to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve over the last five years."

"One particularly troubling aspect of Index Speculator demand is that it actually increases the more prices increase. This explains the accelerating rate at which commodity futures prices (and actual commodity prices) are increasing. Rising prices attract more Index Speculators, whose tendency is to increase their allocation as prices rise. So their profit-motivated demand for futures is the inverse of what you would expect from price-sensitive consumer behavior."

Congress and President Bush are enabling this speculation. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission “has granted Wall Street banks an exemption from speculative position limits when these banks hedge over-the-counter swaps transactions. This has effectively opened a loophole for unlimited speculation. When Index Speculators enter into commodity index swaps, which 85-90% of them do, they face no speculative position limits. “

"The really shocking thing about the Swaps Loophole (aka Enron Loophole) is that Speculators of all stripes can use it to access the futures markets. So if a hedge fund wants a $500 million position in Wheat, which is way beyond position limits, they can enter into swap with a Wall Street bank and then the bank buys $500 million worth of Wheat futures. In the CFTC’s classification scheme all Speculators accessing the futures markets through the Swaps Loophole are categorized as “Commercial” rather than “Non-Commercial.” The result is a gross distortion in data that effectively hides the full impact of Index Speculation.

"Additionally, the CFTC has recently proposed that Index Speculators be exempt from all position limits, thereby throwing the door open for unlimited Index Speculator “investment.” The CFTC has even gone so far as to issue press releases on their website touting studies they commissioned showing that commodities futures make good additions to Institutional Investors’ portfolios."
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline jtyangel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9116
  • Reputation: +497/-110
Re: Speculators in Commodities
« Reply #1 on: May 25, 2008, 09:24:32 PM »
We were just discussing just this thing in another thread. There are many legitimate businesses who do buy futures to hedge against prices...Southwest did this many years ago and it helped them keep their prices low since they were able to buy fuel at what those future price contracts were. However, right now there is indeed an influx of money into this commodities market. The talk is that they are currency traders who can't make money in that market presently and are looking for something else to make a profit at. It's not all of the problem. Gas, even without the speculation, was not likely to go below 2 bucks a gallon consistently ever again.

If it is any validation to this, legitimate traders, portfolio fund managers, financial advisors are chit chatting about this being the case as well. There is a lot of buzz going on on this recently. Opec is supposedly at capacity with their production and word recently was that stockpiles here were higher then expected.

As was said on the other thread, the bubble will pop, just like many other bubbles before it popped. And they will hope and pray for it because a smart trader is likely shorting the hell out of oil right now. Right now though, many close those positions on 3 or 4 points so we see this up and down, up and down between 3.75-4.05 because of it. It's nuts, just nuts.

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: Speculators in Commodities
« Reply #2 on: May 25, 2008, 11:10:20 PM »
I'm glad someone else is catching on, because I'm wearing out my mouse here.   :-)

Speculators may account for as much as 60% of the current price of oil.

Congress must move at a snail's pace (or chose to do nothing) because the testimony Engdahl uses is from 2006.
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.