Am I reading this correctly? Gravity is not necessarily a property of mass and can exist independently of it?
Also, the balance between matter and anti matter may be due to the existence of the multiple dimesions?
Gravity,
as we visualize it is a function of mass, but only in the presence of the assumption of time as linear. If one were to view "time" as an infinite variable, gravity is no longer dependent on the presence of mass.
We see it presently as the relationship "force" between two celestial bodies (for example), but in the instance of a "black hole" resulting from a collapsed star, the force known as gravity becomes theoretically infinite (in our present understanding), and the observable mass has disappeared. Mass is mass, whether the mass of a star is nine hundred thousand kilometers in diameter, or collapses to the size of a basketball, theoretically, the mass (sans energy burnoff) should remain approximately the same for sake of argument, so why the monumental increase in the gravitational effect within the event horizon. So now we have thrown a new variable into the mix........a given gravitational force is no longer dependent on the presence of a fixed quantity of mass, but the "density" thereof..........therefore other forces are at work in this example besides our view of gravity as a matter-dependent constant.
The initial thought was that the "gravity" flux in this example becomes so intense that no measurable light can emerge, however other forms of energy do emerge from these singularities, which would nullify the flux theory. So why does the gravitational effect increase in these singularities, when we are dealing with a (relatively) constant presence of mass (regardless of density). Further, why do some forms of energy escape from them, while others do not?
Singularities are not good examples of our understanding (or lack thereof) of quantum level occurrences, as, I suspect, there is much more going on in them than we are aware of.........a dimensional gateway, or rip in "our" space/time continuum.......perhaps, but they are far more complex than we are presently capable of seeing and measuring.
Regarding your second question, since we have yet to observe the presence of antimatter anywhere other than in a laboratory, we don't know whether the balance between these two states is interdimensional, but the suspicion is that it is, based on the cataclysmic results when the two states are intentionally merged The energy released by an intentional combining of the two states far exceeds the calculated conversion levels, therefore the additional energy is coming from somewhere else.........and it is also theorized that it is an area where "time" as we know it becomes spherical, rather than linear.
doc