Recall Election Fraud in Wisconsin? You Betcha!

[Revolution]

When the DUmbshits can e'splain how in the hell there was vote tallies equaling 119% of their full voter registry in Madison, WI and not sound completely full of shit simultaneously, I might be willing to discuss vote fraud in Wisconsin with them.

Had one on my FB tell me it was all because of new voter registrants.

Poor DUmmies actually think that Diebold doesn't cover its tracks so well that no one will ever find out.

I think if we turn the ParGen up anymore, it's gonna break.

[delilahmused]

Now this is a perfect example of Republicans versus Democrats, Freeper said this:

Now I make a comment about not getting polled in years, it turns into a double entendre, now do I

A) whine like a baby and be all offended

B) go all Gloria Steinem

C) because it was funny

What would a Democrat do?

Well, considering how vile they are they're rotting from the inside out so Lord knows what smelly shit is in a DUmmie's snatch. Probably why they go all Gloria Steinem. Would you wanna hit that? Whereas you, Bally, are hawt. So I'd pick 'C'! We all know you could get polled (or pole dance) anytime you want to.

Cindie

[miskie]

When the DUmbshits can e'splain how in the hell there was vote tallies equaling 119% of their full voter registry in Madison, WI and not sound completely full of shit simultaneously, I might be willing to discuss vote fraud in Wisconsin with them.

The primitives claim it's because of same day registration, and tons of Madison residents who have never voted were fired up to oust Walker. I don't buy it. Anyway, I realized a simple way to prove likely voter fraud in Madison this morning.

Check the unemployment numbers for the city. As a control, do the same to maybe a dozen other large WI cities. Figure the percent difference. Using U6 data, one should be able to come up with a ballpark figure on current Madison residents. Then compare the totals.

If Madison is totally out of line, then there is likely a problem.

[Freeper]

Had one on my FB tell me it was all because of new voter registrants.

I think if we turn the ParGen up anymore, it's gonna break.

I saw that on DU as well, granted I don't know exactly how it works , but I would think that when more people register it would be added to the number of registered voters in that county, city, or whatever. For example let's say there was 50k people registered the day before, another 10k registers the day of, now you have 60k registered, out of the now 60K registered 55k vote do you get the % using 50k or the 60K? I suppose if records aren't updated and they still use 50k as the baseline then it would be possible to have a % over 100. Not trying to defend the DUmmies math just trying to find the truth.

[Skul]

I think if we turn the ParGen up anymore, it's gonna break.

R&D is working on that now. Easiest thing would have been running heavier cable to it. Decided not to because the primatives would have tried cutting the thing for a chunk to sell for weed money.
A few of them would have been flash-bulbed before they finally succeeded. 
Anyway, we thought it best to move into the 21st centry and get rid of the old tube unit, and go solid-state. 

I saw that on DU as well, granted I don't know exactly how it works , but I would think that when more people register it would be added to the number of registered voters in that county, city, or whatever. For example let's say there was 50k people registered the day before, another 10k registers the day of, now you have 60k registered, out of the now 60K registered 55k vote do you get the % using 50k or the 60K? I suppose if records aren't updated and they still use 50k as the baseline then it would be possible to have a % over 100. Not trying to defend the DUmmies math just trying to find the truth.

I had wondered about just that thing. You're probably correct.

[GOBUCKS]

119% voter turnout would be a record low in the jug-eared Kenyan's Chicago ward.

And over half of them cast their ballots at 2 a.m.