DFW (43,591 posts)
A medical reason for not getting vaxxed is legit. A "constitutional reason" is not
I have seen quotes recently about how anti-vaxxers are saying it is their constitutional right to refuse vaccination against Covid-19. Well, yes, technically, they are correct. It is also their constitutional right to attempt to swim solo from Maine to Bermuda. Other than feeling slight misgivings about eating tuna caught in the western North Atlantic in the few weeks following such an attempt, I don't care about the idiot swimmer. If a vaccination poses a real dire medical threat to someone, and a competent physician confirms this, THAT is a legitimate reason for passing on getting inoculated. Saying you heard on Fox Noise that it was all a libbrul plot is not.
The anti-vaxxers are walking petri dishes for new mutations that could ultimately kill me or people I care about. Even gun owners who walk around in states with open carry are considered a public menace if they walk around with those guns drawn and pointed at people.
How about this for a Constitutional Amendment? "The right of the people to not be constantly subjected to mortal danger from irrational fanatics, foreign or domestic, shall not be infringed."
How's this for a medical reason?
Lead poisoning would be bad for your health.
TreasonousBastard (38,421 posts)
1. Agreed. I doubt I'm the only one not impressed by amateur historians, would-be lawyers, and...
just plain idiots making claims about things they simply don't understand.
I know it would be wrong on many levels, but sometimes I wish for a serious test to "officially" make it to adulthood.
said the not-a-Ph.D. in Virology
DFW (43,591 posts)
2. There's an idea
Instead of an "Intelligence quotient (IQ)" devise a test for a "Maturity quotient," an MQ, if you will, and make ineligible for public office those who do not possess any.
Shall we traipse over to the mental health forum on DU?
leftieNanner (10,388 posts)
3. Our County is only 46% vaccinated!
Just learned that yesterday. Lots of hippy anti-vaxxers (don't believe in ANY vaccines ever). I never stopped masking and will be going back into lockdown mode. Damn it!
Star Member DFW (43,591 posts)
4. I hear that back home in EU land there is quite a lot of vocal resistance, too
Of course, in France, it is enough for the government to suggest something for some people to take to the streets to protest it. If Macron were to announce a cure for cancer, the Oncologists Union would protest endangering their jobs.
Oh. So, it's not just Trump.
So, what you're saying is: The premise of your own OP is completely unscientific and based solely on political prejudice.
RockRaven (9,004 posts)
5. As far as I'm concerned, they have as much "right" to not get vaxxed as a suicide bomber has
to blow up their bomb in a public space -- none at all. It doesn't matter what they believe, they have no right to harm others by acting upon it.
When suicide bombers were detonating themselves every other day you and your ilk were making excuses for them.
Ms. Toad (27,578 posts)
8. They actually don't have a constitutional right to refuse vaccination.
If there are laws mandating it and they violate those laws, they can be subjected to the appropriate punishment. Precisely BECAUSE there is no constitutional right to refuse vaccination.
Emanations and penumbras, you ****.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100215693849