TexasTowelie (34,245 posts) Mon Feb 6, 2017, 04:51 AM
3. I'm sorry that you are going through all of that,
but at least you are getting paid hourly.
I went through one stretch at my last job where every week I worked at least 70 hours for three months straight and topped out at 83 hours during one week. I arrived at the office at 6:15 a.m. and on several days didn't get home until 10:15 p.m. By the time that I ironed clothes for the next day, ate and unwound it was nearly 1 a.m. and I would have to wake up the next day at 5 a.m. to repeat the process. ...
The thought of quiting a job they did not like never entered its head and went crazy (or crazier) because of it.
There's a very large computer equipment company here in Silicon Valley where 70-90 hours a week is pretty much the norm for engineers. It isn't Apple Computers, BTW. At the company I refer to, an "Excellent" rating on your annual review means your job is in trouble. I usually don't apply for jobs with that company during job searches. In 2002, when I was out of work for 9 months due to the DotBomb recession -
desperation station - I sent my resume' to them. And I've taken a few jobs with long commutes (one was 75 miles round-trip in SF Bay Area traffic) and lousy facilities (one, in 2002, was like walking back into 1978, and they knew where to position benches and buckets to avoid damage and catch drips during a rainstorm). But, yeah. If TT wasn't in a
desperation station survival job (s)he should have found another job and split (without burning bridges).
Back on topic, maybe Tobers should give a little thought to the way the Feds, and maybe IN, have made hiring new people difficult, expensive, and risky. Regs re drivers' licensing and safety records are common sense. The huge $$ burden of adding a new employee, the bureaucratic "I"-dotting and ethnic-head-counting, and the difficulty of firing some one who isn't working out (Or who isn't working! Or who is of one or more of the several "protected" classes! * ) is reprehensible. And if Tobers works in a union shop, that adds a whole 'nother set of layers that discourage hiring a new driver. Not that Tobers would acknowledge - let alone care about - his employer's need to operate at a profit.
*
Some one I know had a coworker who in a 6-9 month period may have had a less than 50% attendance record. But the person was not canned, because the person was "disabled", and is a homosexual (I won't say whether anatomically male or female). Finally the person was placed on unpaid indefinite administrative leave. A person not of a PC-Protected class would have been canned after a month of that kind of @#$%!