Author Topic: Public School funding is more important than educating children.  (Read 1263 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2222/-127
Public School funding is more important than educating children.
« on: February 11, 2010, 01:26:33 PM »
Quote
cjbgreen   (49 posts)           Thu Feb-11-10 01:34 PM
Original message
Poll question: Do you think charter schools contribute to a more segregated society?   
   
Edited on Thu Feb-11-10 01:46 PM by cjbgreen
Charter School Report Finds Widespread Segregation, Including in Minnesota
by Beth Hawkins http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2010/02/11-7
Hawkins cites two recent reports on charter schools and notes:
Text
"In Minnesota, the report found, much of this segregation can be attributed to the fact that many urban charters are targeted at students of a single race or ethnicity. By contrast, in the western United States, where traditional schools are typically more diverse, charters "are havens for white re-segregation from public schools," researchers reported.
A second study released earlier this week found that charters operated by so-called education management organizations - private corporations - segregate by race, income, disability, and language.
"The student population is pushed out to the extremes," researchers at Western Michigan University and the University of Colorado at Boulder concluded. "Most charter schools were divided into either very segregated high-income schools or very segregated low-income schools."}Text

Poll result (21 votes)
Charter schools foster segregation intentionally and unintentionally.    (15 votes, 71%)   Vote
Charter schools do foster segregation in some situations .    (3 votes, 14%)   Vote
Charter schools do not foster segregation.    (3 votes, 14%)   Vote
Segregating students is harmful to children and society.    (0 votes, 0%)   Vote
Integrating students is not an important role of public education.    (0 votes, 0%)   Vote
  http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x7693443

Quote
ixion   (1000+ posts)               Thu Feb-11-10 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. charter schools are what public schools ought to be
   
the difference in the quality and depth of education is considerable, from my experience. In that regard, charter schools contribute to a segregated society.

Not a big fan of the teacher unions, are you?
Quote
Vincardog   (1000+ posts)           Thu Feb-11-10 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. The purpose of charter schools is to de-fund public education. They should not be allowed.

They show that unions are detrimental to education, and that shouldn't be allowed.  FIFY

Quote
alstephenson   (1000+ posts)           Thu Feb-11-10 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's B.S.
   
And you know it. What information do you base this statement on?

Quote
tonysam   (1000+ posts)             Thu Feb-11-10 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. It has EVERYTHING to do with destroying public education
   
Why do you think billionaires are up to their eyeballs funding these things?
Like that evil conservative Rethuglican Bill Gates? :sarcasm:

Quote
Vincardog   (1000+ posts)           Thu Feb-11-10 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I base this on 30 years of watching rePIGlickers implement their anti-education agenda.

Yeah, Education funding goes up every year, union teachers make more money, kids get dumber. Sounds  good to me.

Quote
alstephenson   (1000+ posts)           Thu Feb-11-10 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. Many charter schools are run by mission-oriented non-profits.
   
They choose to serve low-income communities and students with a high percentage of "at risk" students. The fact that these communities and students are comprised primarily of minorities speaks more about our society than it does about charter schools. So charter schools MAY be segregated, but they DO NOT segregate.

That is what I see in the 2 charter schools that I pass by several times a week.  The students are bused from their neighborhoods to nicer schools. Almost every kid is a minority, here that means black. 

Offline The Village Idiot

  • Banned
  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 54
  • Reputation: +96/-15
Re: Public School funding is more important than educating children.
« Reply #1 on: February 11, 2010, 01:31:31 PM »
Thundley,
Charter schools are publicly funded.

DUmmies should love it.

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2222/-127
Re: Public School funding is more important than educating children.
« Reply #2 on: February 11, 2010, 01:35:09 PM »
Thundley,
Charter schools are publicly funded.

DUmmies should love it.

But that money is taken from the schools that support unions.  [/DU mode]  I think charter schools are a good idea where the public schools are failing, and that is in most   cities.

Offline Texacon

  • Super
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12311
  • Reputation: +1250/-55
  • All The Way!
Re: Public School funding is more important than educating children.
« Reply #3 on: February 11, 2010, 01:51:44 PM »
Quote
Vincardog   (1000+ posts)           Thu Feb-11-10 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I base this on 30 years of watching rePIGlickers implement their anti-education agenda.

Can they be any more juvenile? 

Vincardog   how old are you ..... 10?

KC
  Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day.  Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life.

*Stolen

Offline jukin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15750
  • Reputation: +1724/-170
Re: Public School funding is more important than educating children.
« Reply #4 on: February 11, 2010, 01:53:15 PM »
The DUchebags do know that the hard left controls the education system and has for over thirty five years?

When you are the beneficiary of someone’s kindness and generosity, it produces a sense of gratitude and community.

When you are the beneficiary of a policy that steals from someone and gives it to you in return for your vote, it produces a sense of entitlement and dependency.

Offline kenth

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1017
  • Reputation: +1/-0
Re: Public School funding is more important than educating children.
« Reply #5 on: February 11, 2010, 03:30:48 PM »
Two things they don't like about charter schools; non-unionized teachers and students not captive to leftist indoctrination.

Offline The Village Idiot

  • Banned
  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 54
  • Reputation: +96/-15
Re: Public School funding is more important than educating children.
« Reply #6 on: February 11, 2010, 03:32:19 PM »
Two things they don't like about charter schools; non-unionized teachers and students not captive to leftist indoctrination.

true.

Offline Tucker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10935
  • Reputation: +535/-97
  • Making money the old fashioned way- Paid Mole
Re: Public School funding is more important than educating children.
« Reply #7 on: February 11, 2010, 04:48:34 PM »
Two things they don't like about charter schools; non-unionized teachers and students not captive to leftist indoctrination.

Can you say tenure.
Come to think of it, unions do create jobs. Companies have to hire two workers to do the work of one.

Offline delilahmused

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7384
  • Reputation: +1367/-80
  • Devil Mom
Re: Public School funding is more important than educating children.
« Reply #8 on: February 11, 2010, 06:19:23 PM »
If charter schools are funded as part of public education wouldn't they use union teachers? One of the tricks some districts here use is to start an "online" or charter-like school for homeschoolers. The districts get funding for full time students without having students there more than part time. Eventually they try to put more and more rules and restrictions and testing requirements on families to the point that they might as well be in the school system. I know my views are pretty radical but I'd really like to see schools (at least the way they are today) abolished. Every child is autodidactic with an insatiable love of learning. Then they're put into an institution that plays to a single learning style and caters to the lowest common denominator.

Cindie
"If God built me a ladder to heaven, I would climb it and elbow drop the world."
Mick Foley

"I am a very good shot. I have hunted for every kind of animal. But I would never kill an animal during mating season."
Hedy Lamarr

"I'm just like any modern woman trying to have it all. Loving husband, a family. It's just, I wish I had more time to seek out the dark forces and join their hellish crusade."
Morticia Addams

Offline miskie

  • Mailman for the VRWC
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10449
  • Reputation: +1015/-54
  • Make America Great Again. Deport some DUmmies.
Re: Public School funding is more important than educating children.
« Reply #9 on: February 11, 2010, 06:36:26 PM »
We send our oldest to the area charter (she is in 5th - the charter runs 5th through high school)

1- the racial makeup seems to be a reflection of the city, I see no bias in any direction.

2- enrollment is based on lottery (for the first entrant in your family, siblings get automatically accepted) and the names are pulled in public by random people.

3- enrollment is voluntary.

4- the school is funded via public funds, as well as from grants from non-profits. The extra grants definitely help the school remain on the bleeding edge curriculum-wise. Computers, technical and martial arts are taught on top of the usual courses (5th grade) and the students do several projects a year, and have numerous educational field trips as well.

5- the school is classed as a public school - it also has special education teachers, and has to meet or exceed all benchmarks for public schools (rest assured, it exceeds them all)

So -- to the Charter deniers..

Funds aren't "drained" from the other schools, they are supplemented by sources that the other public schools can't use.

Educators are outside of the teacher's unions, and choose to be there voluntarily. Regardless of their personal political affiliation, I am certain that these are teachers who feel they can succeed on their own merit, and not ride along on the tenure bus - meaning they have to be talented, or they will become unemployed. Just like the private sector.

Massachusetts is using the charter schools to pioneer new education techniques that will be spread to the regular public schools- so eventually all will benefit.

finally, to those that are interested, or those primitives who feel Im just blowing smoke http://glcps.org/  -- the website of the charter to which I refer.






« Last Edit: February 11, 2010, 06:39:53 PM by miskie »

Offline blitzkrieg_17

  • The harder they come, the harder they fall
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1880
  • Reputation: +126/-69
Re: Public School funding is more important than educating children.
« Reply #10 on: February 11, 2010, 07:29:51 PM »
Can they be any more juvenile? 

Vincardog   how old are you ..... 10?

KC

Probably. History is not taught in the publik skewlz.
Caught somewhere in time

Offline AllosaursRus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11672
  • Reputation: +424/-293
  • Skip Tracing by Contract Only!
Re: Public School funding is more important than educating children.
« Reply #11 on: February 12, 2010, 01:32:18 AM »
If charter schools are funded as part of public education wouldn't they use union teachers? One of the tricks some districts here use is to start an "online" or charter-like school for homeschoolers. The districts get funding for full time students without having students there more than part time. Eventually they try to put more and more rules and restrictions and testing requirements on families to the point that they might as well be in the school system. I know my views are pretty radical but I'd really like to see schools (at least the way they are today) abolished. Every child is autodidactic with an insatiable love of learning. Then they're put into an institution that plays to a single learning style and caters to the lowest common denominator.

Cindie

These asshats are trying to meld private schools and charter schools!!!!!!!!!!! They aren't even close!

THIS, is what the left does! Their call of racist cannot be applied to "charters". Charters are by far, more diverse than even public schools. Parents try like hell to get their kids into them and away from the frikkin gang violence so prevelant in our inner city schools. They try, without it costing them a damn fortune, and their child's lives!!

Can you blame them?????

DUmmie liberals, would like you to think that they are the same as private schools that, will pick and choose! Much as I hate to dismiss these idiots, (heh), they actually think it's done for race..... believe it or not, privates actually look at ...........wait for it.........academic superiority. Whether or not you can still afford to pay the damn tuition will also make a diff whether or not you get in!

Charters, on the other hand, would recieve Gubmint subsidies on top of tuition from parents, in order to get their children to excell!. Of course this is before the Bummer shut it down! I don't know the number, but Bummer just "****ed" a whole bunch of kids in DC!

In order to get thier kids, out of the hell hole that is our inner city sewege, that has become the "Public School system", they were willing to go BROKE!! Ya think the "Bummer" would help them, wouldn't ya? After all he's half their color! He has stopped the funding for inner city kids. His first stop on this travesty was DC!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

For this, I will never forgive him! The reason these parents were enrolled in this program was to get them the hell out of the gang life! I guess Bummer would rather fund the Teachers and SEIU, before he would help his own out of the gutter!

Yeah, now you can call me RACIST! [/rant] Damn, this guy pisses me off!



ETA: 'cause of a few too many...........
« Last Edit: February 12, 2010, 01:42:22 AM by AllosaursRus »
I'm the guy your mother warned you about!
 

Offline notaDUmmie

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 366
  • Reputation: +60/-7
  • MDT 5/20/96-6/19/15
Re: Public School funding is more important than educating children.
« Reply #12 on: February 12, 2010, 05:45:14 AM »
What Obama and the Dems did to school children in DC is a crime, or at least it should be.  Children from poor families and failing schools were thriving in private schools paid for with vouchers.  And I can't speak for the non-Catholic schools, but the Catholic schools were accepting the vouchers and charging nothing above that amount.

For all the bitching and moaning the left does about private schools, the cold, hard fact is that the public schools would be overwhelmed if all the private school kids registered for the local public schools.  We pay the taxes for the public schools, but the private school kids don't use that money.  In Fairfax county, thousands of kids go to Catholic schools - the public schools would be overwhelmed if we all one day decided to register them at the local public schools.

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2222/-127
Re: Public School funding is more important than educating children.
« Reply #13 on: February 12, 2010, 06:27:16 AM »
What Obama and the Dems did to school children in DC is a crime, or at least it should be.  Children from poor families and failing schools were thriving in private schools paid for with vouchers.  And I can't speak for the non-Catholic schools, but the Catholic schools were accepting the vouchers and charging nothing above that amount.

For all the bitching and moaning the left does about private schools, the cold, hard fact is that the public schools would be overwhelmed if all the private school kids registered for the local public schools.  We pay the taxes for the public schools, but the private school kids don't use that money.  In Fairfax county, thousands of kids go to Catholic schools - the public schools would be overwhelmed if we all one day decided to register them at the local public schools.

I don't know about other places, but the Catholic schools here offer help to lower income families that are members of the Catholic Church.

Offline Celtic Rose

  • All American Girl
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4150
  • Reputation: +303/-32
Re: Public School funding is more important than educating children.
« Reply #14 on: February 12, 2010, 08:45:33 AM »
I don't know about other places, but the Catholic schools here offer help to lower income families that are members of the Catholic Church.

They do that here as well.  I've heard of people who start attending church regularly a few years before their child will start attending school so that they are part of the diocese and their child can get into/get financial aid for local Catholic Schools.

I went to a Catholic high school.  I didn't get in my freshman year because I'm not Catholic, and Catholics of course get priority, but they had space for my sophomore year.  Best decision ever. 

Offline BlueStateSaint

  • Here I come to save the day, because I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32553
  • Reputation: +1560/-191
  • RIP FDNY Lt. Rich Nappi d. 4/16/12
Re: Public School funding is more important than educating children.
« Reply #15 on: February 12, 2010, 09:31:43 AM »
They do that here as well.  I've heard of people who start attending church regularly a few years before their child will start attending school so that they are part of the diocese and their child can get into/get financial aid for local Catholic Schools.

I went to a Catholic high school.  I didn't get in my freshman year because I'm not Catholic, and Catholics of course get priority, but they had space for my sophomore year.  Best decision ever.  

My wife's sister, who is a sort-of moonbat, was thrilled to get her oldest daughter into a local Catholic kindergarten.  They apparently have a long waiting list, too.  I'd take a second job as a McDonald's fry cook, if that would be what it would take to pay for The Heiress (and any future children) to go to Catholic schools.  I went from kindergarten through the end of high school, as did my brother and two sisters.
"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty." - Thomas Jefferson

"All you have to do is look straight and see the road, and when you see it, don't sit looking at it - walk!" -Ayn Rand
 
"Those that trust God with their safety must yet use proper means for their safety, otherwise they tempt Him, and do not trust Him.  God will provide, but so must we also." - Matthew Henry, Commentary on 2 Chronicles 32, from Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible

"These anti-gun fools are more dangerous to liberty than street criminals or foreign spies."--Theodore Haas, Dachau Survivor

Chase her.
Chase her even when she's yours.
That's the only way you'll be assured to never lose her.

Offline AllosaursRus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11672
  • Reputation: +424/-293
  • Skip Tracing by Contract Only!
Re: Public School funding is more important than educating children.
« Reply #16 on: February 12, 2010, 10:15:36 AM »
My wife's sister, who is a sort-of moonbat, was thrilled to get her oldest daughter into a local Catholic kindergarten.  They apparently have a long waiting list, too.  I'd take a second job as a McDonald's fry cook, if that would be what it would take to pay for The Heiress (and any future children) to go to Catholic schools.  I went from kindergarten through the end of high school, as did my brother and two sisters.

My kids, and grandkids, are fortunate enough to have parents that have always lived in conservative areas of the country. We will not allow what happens in the Big City to influence our children's education. It's a sad fact that you have to enroll your children in private schools in order for them to get a decent education nowadays in the "blue" parts of the country.
I'm the guy your mother warned you about!