RamboLiberal (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-16-09 05:16 PM
Original message
Stop Annual Mammograms, Govt. Panel Tells Women Under 50
Source: ABC News
An influential government panel of experts has issued new recommendations on what age women should get screened for breast cancer and how often. The new guidelines have set off a sharp debate over whether mammography screening done at younger ages and more frequently saves enough lives to justify the costs of overtreatment.
Blah, blah, blah....
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4148888Raven (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-16-09 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. My, my, my... a good friend of mine was 42 and had her first mammogram
and has just completed breat cancer treatments and is facing reconstruction. No way of knowing how long the cancer was in her breast and growing...
Delphinus (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-16-09 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why in the world would they
recommend AGAINST teaching breast self-exams?!
pitohui (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-16-09 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. because a false positive can lead to amputation where it wouldn't have been necessary
one of my mom's clients had a lump (you do understand that MOST lumps are cysts, esp. in younger breasts)
she had a biopsy
the biopsy infected her with MRSA
she lost not only the breasts but her arm and both legs
you people who fantasize that "early testing" has no risks are living in a dream world
there are fates worse than death and living the rest of your life unable to walk and with only ONE limb is certainly one of them
the consequences of paranoia are extreme
i for one would rather die a little younger than need be than lose my limbs and my freedom
But, but early detection is what 0BamaCare is all about. Now why would this government group recommend against it? To save the government money once 0BamaCare is enacted, maybe?
Indydem (493 posts) Mon Nov-16-09 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. WTF?
Is this the start of some kind of rationing BS that the government is trying to play a game with?
There is no such thing as "overtreatment" of a simple test that can catch a dreadful, terrible disease such as breast cancer.
Probably a panel made up of men under 50 who know of no one personally with the disease.
The government would be better off to take the salary of these pinhead assholes and pay it into breast cancer research.
Ding, ding, ding , we have a winner, his tombstone is on order.
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-16-09 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. It's the insurance companies who HAVE BEEN RATIONING CARE FOR YEARS.
Right, but the government rationing will be so much better, right? I mean after all, they have to keep their customers happy.
From there it devolves into most people being supportive of the new recommendations.