Send Us Hatemail ! mailbag@conservativecave.com
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
MindPilot (1000+ posts) Sun Apr-27-08 10:47 PMOriginal messageI'm so ****ing pissed off right now I can't even think. Just watched the fawning love-fest 60 minutes piece about Scalia. What a useless ignorant subhuman piece of shit. That mother****er is absolutely gleeful that he single-handedly set in motion the cluster **** of this administration. The treasonous cocksucker needs to be ****ing GONE. And everybody that sat in an audience and laughed at his cutesy quips should be beaten within an inch of their pathetic groveling little lives.
MNBrewer (39 posts) Sun Apr-27-08 11:42 PMResponse to Original message22. If the OP can refer to Scalia as a "cocksucker"If the OP can refer to Scalia as a "COCKSUCKER", why can't I question what's wrong with sucking cock? This is HOMOPHOBIA, pure and simple. Scalia may be many awful things, but he is NOT a cocksucker, and sucking cock isn't an awful thing. I PROTEST!
linky?
Quote from: freedumb2003 on April 27, 2008, 11:10:55 PMlinky?If you insist. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3216230
Quote from: Lord Undies on April 27, 2008, 11:13:59 PMQuote from: freedumb2003 on April 27, 2008, 11:10:55 PMlinky?If you insist. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3216230No need to get huffy!!
Quote from: freedumb2003 on April 27, 2008, 11:25:44 PMQuote from: Lord Undies on April 27, 2008, 11:13:59 PMQuote from: freedumb2003 on April 27, 2008, 11:10:55 PMlinky?If you insist. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3216230No need to get huffy!!:)I'm not mad at you. I am mad at the omission.
Quote from: Lord Undies on April 27, 2008, 11:13:59 PMQuote from: freedumb2003 on April 27, 2008, 11:10:55 PMlinky?If you insist. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3216230No need to get huffy!!:)
Quote from: Lord Undies on April 27, 2008, 11:28:05 PMQuote from: freedumb2003 on April 27, 2008, 11:25:44 PMQuote from: Lord Undies on April 27, 2008, 11:13:59 PMQuote from: freedumb2003 on April 27, 2008, 11:10:55 PMlinky?If you insist. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3216230No need to get huffy!!I'm not mad at you. I am mad at the omission. Well, I guess those faggie smilies work to let you know that I was just joshing you. And FWIIW, I suspect I am almost as old as you are. Almost.
Quote from: freedumb2003 on April 27, 2008, 11:25:44 PMQuote from: Lord Undies on April 27, 2008, 11:13:59 PMQuote from: freedumb2003 on April 27, 2008, 11:10:55 PMlinky?If you insist. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3216230No need to get huffy!!I'm not mad at you. I am mad at the omission.
Quote from: freedumb2003 on April 27, 2008, 11:29:49 PMQuote from: Lord Undies on April 27, 2008, 11:28:05 PMQuote from: freedumb2003 on April 27, 2008, 11:25:44 PMQuote from: Lord Undies on April 27, 2008, 11:13:59 PMQuote from: freedumb2003 on April 27, 2008, 11:10:55 PMlinky?If you insist. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3216230No need to get huffy!!:)I'm not mad at you. I am mad at the omission. Well, I guess those faggie smilies work to let you know that I was just joshing you. And FWIIW, I suspect I am almost as old as you are. Almost.If we outlaw faggie smilies, only faggies will be outlaws.I think you are older than I. My birth year keeps changing.
Quote from: Lord Undies on April 27, 2008, 11:28:05 PMQuote from: freedumb2003 on April 27, 2008, 11:25:44 PMQuote from: Lord Undies on April 27, 2008, 11:13:59 PMQuote from: freedumb2003 on April 27, 2008, 11:10:55 PMlinky?If you insist. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3216230No need to get huffy!!:)I'm not mad at you. I am mad at the omission. Well, I guess those faggie smilies work to let you know that I was just joshing you. And FWIIW, I suspect I am almost as old as you are. Almost.
MindPilot (1000+ posts) Sun Apr-27-08 10:47 PMOriginal message I'm so ****ing pissed off right now I can't even think. Just watched the fawning love-fest 60 minutes piece about Scalia. What a useless ignorant subhuman piece of shit. That mother****er is absolutely gleeful that he single-handedly set in motion the cluster **** of this administration. The treasonous cocksucker needs to be ****ing GONE. And everybody that sat in an audience and laughed at his cutesy quips should be beaten within an inch of their pathetic groveling little lives.
pinto (1000+ posts) Mon Apr-28-08 12:00 AMResponse to Original message 24. Locking. Please find some other phrasing than "cocksucker" to describe that sad excuse for a jurist, Scalia.Thanks.Play ball!
Since when can one not use the term "cocksucker" on DU?
Scalia's pursuit of strict interpretation, judicial restraint, and bright-line distinctions in the law has led him to surprising votes in his years on the bench.
QuoteMindPilot (1000+ posts) Sun Apr-27-08 10:47 PMOriginal messageI'm so ****ing pissed off right now I can't even think. Just watched the fawning love-fest 60 minutes piece about Scalia. What a useless ignorant subhuman piece of shit. That mother****er is absolutely gleeful that he single-handedly set in motion the cluster **** of this administration. The treasonous cocksucker needs to be ****ing GONE. And everybody that sat in an audience and laughed at his cutesy quips should be beaten within an inch of their pathetic groveling little lives.Yada Yada Yada...20 or so mindless and predictable DUmmie posts of mental diarrhea.....and then:QuoteMNBrewer (39 posts) Sun Apr-27-08 11:42 PMResponse to Original message22. If the OP can refer to Scalia as a "cocksucker"If the OP can refer to Scalia as a "COCKSUCKER", why can't I question what's wrong with sucking cock? This is HOMOPHOBIA, pure and simple. Scalia may be many awful things, but he is NOT a cocksucker, and sucking cock isn't an awful thing. I PROTEST!I think our own Cactus Carlos has another mole.
This proves again that primitives live to be pissed off. What sane person would purposely watch a program that they knew was going to make them angry? not me...I would change the channel and go on with my life..
You were doing well until you showed your command of proper grammar. My grammar, when proper, is a tortured result of lessons my mother taught me when young (I now know this is not common amongst my peers). Your grammar continues to have the gentility of one who was brought up in an era where boys wore short pants.Your written diction does you proud but exposes you for the learned freak of a bygone era."There is good in you, I am sure."