The system we have here, as well as used on sites such as freerepublic and our old home, lists comments in exact chronological order.
As a thread grows, it tends to draw comments referring to comments, and not to the original post.
Here, as at our old home, if a commenter wishes to refer to an earlier comment, instead of punching "reply," he punches "quote," and so when his own comment shows up, the comment to which he was referring also shows up.
As easy as strawberries-and-cream for us, but difficult for those with lesser-developed cerebral capacities to grasp.
At freerepublic, which of course is older, it's a little bit more time-consuming, where one has to do the "<" and ">" stuff, but after one's done it six or half a dozen times, it's easy.
Easy for decent and civilized people, but difficult for those with primitive brains.
The bottom line being, all posts are shown in exact chronological order.
My fellow alum Skins knows the primitives well; he knows the primitives either can't grasp this, or are inconsiderate of others, and not willing to use any sort of "quote" function.
So on Skins's island, a primitive just "replies"--either to the original post or a comment.
And so we get the following happening:
original post
1. comment
2. comment
3. comment
But then a fourth primitive comes along, and instead of wishing to reply to the original post, the primitive wishes to reply to the second comment.
original post
1. comment
2. comment
4. comment
3. comment
After which a fifth primitive, replying not to the original post but to the first comment:
original post
1. comment
5. comment
2. comment
4. comment
3. comment
As a bonfire grows, one ends up with something like this:
original post
1. comment
5. comment
9. comment
2. comment
4. comment
7. comment
3. comment
6. comment
8. comment
One supposes this is okay, except except except.....
Readers of ordinary and greater sophistication read things from the top to the bottom, and sort of generally assume that what's closer to the top pre-dates what's closer to the bottom, of the page.
And don't forget the lying, mendacious nature of the primitives.
Some primitives have become adept at using the system to convolute, to lie, as was discovered during the Scamdal of 2005, taking advantage of the fact that it's natural just to assume the higher (on the page) the comment, the older it is.
That's why when I'm on Skins's island, I pay attention to the numbering sequence of comments; one can catch quite a few primitive lies doing that.
A couple of times here, I have posted bonfires, but not exactly in the order they appeared on Skins's island--instead in exact chronological order, to show the vast extent to which the primitives lie.
But I did that only a couple of times; it's a lot of work to re-arrange a thread.
It's just always easier to automatically assume the primitives are lying, some of the more creative lying ones using this as one means of that.