Hi,
This is my first post. I read an article over the weekend that I found very interesting. This was validated by someone checking the State of AZ website. In a follow up article today the author said the reason states are affirming their sovereignty is that federal mandates are basically unconstitutional and they are bankrupting several states; CA in particular. Not so sure if there may not be more to it that than but we will see.
regards to all conservatives,
5412
Here is the text: The headline was what I posted, "Is this a prelude to secession?"
This week, various state legislatures introduced bills intended to revive
> one of the most important gifts left to us by our forefathers.state
> sovereignty.
>
> No, you won't hear about this on CNBC or Fox News. In fact, we just got word
> of it a few hours ago. All the way from Hawaii to New Hampshire.Georgia and
> California, nine states have so far introduced bills that would reaffirm
> state sovereignty as laid out in the ninth and tenth amendments to the
> constitution.
>
> Now - like I said - we just heard about this news ourselves. And we haven't
> had enough time to really decide what it all means.but there is some strong
> wording in a few of these bills, to say the very least.
>
> This from Arizona's bill, ".if the President or any other federal entity
> attempts to institute martial law or its equivalent without an official
> declaration in one or more of the states without the consent of that state .
> individual members of the military return to their respective states and
> report to the Governor until a new President is elected." [emphasis added]
>
> We'll stay on top of this one and update you next week.