House GOP: Don't get mad over the Omnibus(t) - Get Even. Here's How

[Eupher]

I did a fair amount of bellyaching about that $1.7 trillion POS bill that BOTH of my senators signed off on. One of them, Cotton, did so because he's afraid the military (which is a shadow of its former self, thanks to wokism, Milley, Austin, and the rest of the dangling turds in the Pentagon and DoD) would have not been paid. Boozman signed off because he's a go-along to get-along cretin.

So besides bitching about it, this article lays out what the GOP House SHOULD do in response. Do I have a hope and a prayer that one-tenth of the proposals within it will be done? Hell, no. The GOP, as a political party, is inept, incompetent, and the fools running it are destined to remain so -- even if McCarthy does the right thing and bows out of the Speaker race. (At the very least, the dumbass needs to vacate the Speaker's office itself until and if he's actually voted in. It takes some balls and some chutzpah to move in prematurely, which is odd because McCarthy is well known for not having either of those qualities unless the issue affects him personally.)

oversight, noun /ˈoʊ.vɚ.saɪt/

a mistake caused by a failure to notice or do something
systems or actions to control an activity and make sure that it is done correctly and legally
Cambridge Dictionary

Why do record numbers of poll respondents see America on the wrong track? Perhaps because Congress institutionalizes all too much of the Definition (1) variety of “oversight” – and little, if any, of Definition (2).

Exhibit A: The $1.65 trillion omnibus(t) appropriations bill olé-ed through in the closing hours of the 117th Congress, which sustains the legislative branch’s decades-long “failure” to take notice of its own spending process. The 4,155-page Leviathan, stuffed like a Christmas goose not only with 7,500 earmarks totaling $16 billion but also with stealth substantive statutory changes, represents the norm, not the exception.

Going back more than a decade, such “consolidated appropriations bills” have wrapped up into a single, impenetrable package the annual funding for departments and agencies that is supposed to be appropriated across 12 individual bills required by the 1974 Budget Act. The last time all those bills were actually passed on time? Try fiscal year 1997.

Particularly galling this go-round, however, was that for the first time ever, the lockdown of a full fiscal-year’s outlays occurred in a lame-duck session with one legislative chamber – the House – days away from a changeover in control. Eighteen Republican senators helped pushed across the Democrats’ spendapalooza, understandably incensing members of the newly elected House GOP majority, deprived of the opportunity to instill even a modicum of fiscal discipline.

Yet a cadre of Freedom Caucus members apparently heeded the age-old political advice: don’t get mad, get even. The conservatives insisted they would actively oppose any legislation advanced by any of the returning turncoat senators. Current House GOP leader and, as of this writing, speaker candidate Kevin McCarthy endorsed the view, stating that these senators’ bills “will be dead on arrival in the House.”

That’s one brand of payback, for sure. But here’s an even better one: match the World’s Greatest Deliberative Body’s Definition (1) oversight – carelessly, and callously, ignoring the recently expressed will of American voters – with an aggressive two-step program of Definition (2) oversight.

First, make the new House leadership’s highest order of business to draft and pass all 12 appropriations bills following the “regular order,” including hearings, public markups, and subcommittee, full committee and floor votes. And put the Senate “uniparty” – and the American people – on nine months’ notice that failure on the upper chamber’s part to do the same will result in an epic shutdown showdown that, having been forewarned for three quarters, cannot credibly be pinned on the GOP.

Step Two: In so doing, involve the entire Republican Conference, every committee and subcommittee, and every staffer in a concerted, coordinated crash project to alert the public to each line of spending in the omnibus – and by extension, the Senate GOP’s infamy in abetting it. Every earmark for a local project that has no business being funded out of Washington. Many a head-shaking expenditure on politically correct yet ridiculous research.

Hundreds of millions to facilitate the invasion of our homeland by, and the sustenance of, migrants brazenly breaking our immigration laws. Volumes of propaganda used to advance the perverse LGBTQ+-whatever agenda. Floods of foreign aid and military support for American-scorning “allies,” and in many cases, even enemies, especially assistance doled out to promote values contrary to the host country’s – and our own.

Every greenback of taxpayers’ hard-earned money, and debt being piled on their great-grandchildren, handed out in ways that create and sustain dependency, produce health care market distortions and subpar outcomes, or finance opioids for screen-captive working-age men who have dropped out of the labor force. Every red cent of corporate welfare and crony-capitalist “green” subsidies being funneled into costly, counter-productive renewables production in China as it constructs carbon-belching coal plants to manufacture them.

Every disbursement for tyrannical tax collectors, administrative overlords, and bureaucratic busybodies plaguing small businesses and everyday citizens. And of course, each and every shekel shelled out to propagate prevarications, throttle truth, and persecute patriots.

As part of that process, set in motion a continuous flow of heretofore unaccountable agency heads, entrenched swamp creatures, and deep-state minions to the Hill to defend all that spending: specifically, channeling Mitch Daniels to require explanations of programmatic purposes and objectives and “link funding to results.”

Make them justify why any given dollar for any given program creates more bang than that same buck kept in the hands of citizens and business owners to invest in their own aspirations. And why the $80 billion in new IRS funding won’t be directed to improving the agency’s sorry customer service rather than harassing harried households.

Meanwhile, let loose a 24/7 tweet storm that makes Hurricane Ian look like a balmy zephyr, along with a flood of factoids and press releases that keep the slop of waste and corruption continuously seeping from the muck at the top of the news cycle.

Sunlight, they say, is the best disinfectant. And true, Definition (2) oversight is the best way to let the sunshine in to clean up the swamp.

Bob Maistros is a messaging and communications strategist, crisis specialist, and former political speechwriter. He can be reached at bob@rpmexecutive.com.

https://issuesinsights.com/2023/01/05/house-gop-dont-get-mad-over-the-omnibust-get-even-heres-how/

[Drafe Hoblin]

I think it's obvious to McCarthy that he should 'be a man' and bow-out. 

I'd do it.  -Put myself in a place where I can symbolize 'I toldja so' every time the cameras go to me.

But it looks like McCarthy'd rather 'be a coronated Hillary'... pockets wide-open to any lobbyist dump-truck that lumbers into the landfill. 

As for Trump's so-called 'endorsement' of him, I notice that dems-and-their-media have been stymied from continuing their TDS-bullshit for the longest stretch of time in 7-years.

[DefiantSix]

If I were God for a day, there would be another amendment to the Constitution on the books, requiring Congress' budget to balance and remain balanced, and that any deficit allowed would be divided amongst the Congress-shits that incurred it and a debt owned individually and severally by the Congress-shits under whose tenure that deficit arose. Further, that debt could not be forgiven on the death of the Congress-shit but would fall to s/h/its heirs and assignees until it was repaid in full, and it could not be relieved in bankruptcy court.

I know it'll never happen in my lifetime, but a guy can dream, can't he? 

[Eupher]

If I were God for a day, there would be another amendment to the Constitution on the books, requiring Congress' budget to balance and remain balanced, and that any deficit allowed would be divided amongst the Congress-shits that incurred it and a debt owned individually and severally by the Congress-shits under whose tenure that deficit arose. Further, that debt could not be forgiven on the death of the Congress-shit but would fall to s/h/its heirs and assignees until it was repaid in full, and it could not be relieved in bankruptcy court.

I know it'll never happen in my lifetime, but a guy can dream, can't he? 

Definitely agree with that, and H5, sir.

Another Amendment, perhaps No. 29, that would say something like this:

Term limits and Age of Mandatory Retirement: No person serving in the Congress of the United States shall serve in their elected role beyond 8 years (for U.S. representatives) and 12 years (for U.S. senators). No person serving in the Congress of the United States shall serve beyond the age of 72. No person serving in the Congress of the United States shall serve in a lobbyist role, or on a corporate board following their retirement from the Congress.

(Retirement means RETIREMENT, gentlemen.)

There is lots that can be done with something like this, including the argument that "We already have term limits! They're called ELECTIONS!" True enough, but the counterargument to that is, the system is rigged to keep electing those to office who play by the rules, go-along-to-get-along, and otherwise shut up and do what they're told -- like 92% of Congress.

The moneychangers control everything. And that means the leadership gigs in the 2-party (broken) system, the leadership gigs in Congress (which is why gigs like the Speaker and Senate Leader and Whips are sought), and ultimately the cushy setup whereby those who are cutting the checks get what they want -- more money bilked out of the taxpayer and more for them and their pet projects.

Yeah, you bet a guy can dream. 

[Dblhaul]

If I were God for a day, there would be another amendment to the Constitution on the books, requiring Congress' budget to balance and remain balanced, and that any deficit allowed would be divided amongst the Congress-shits that incurred it and a debt owned individually and severally by the Congress-shits under whose tenure that deficit arose. Further, that debt could not be forgiven on the death of the Congress-shit but would fall to s/h/its heirs and assignees until it was repaid in full, and it could not be relieved in bankruptcy court.

I like your thinking!   

[CollectivismMustDie]

If I were God for a day, there would be another amendment to the Constitution on the books, requiring Congress' budget to balance and remain balanced, and that any deficit allowed would be divided amongst the Congress-shits that incurred it and a debt owned individually and severally by the Congress-shits under whose tenure that deficit arose. Further, that debt could not be forgiven on the death of the Congress-shit but would fall to s/h/its heirs and assignees until it was repaid in full, and it could not be relieved in bankruptcy court.

I know it'll never happen in my lifetime, but a guy can dream, can't he? 

I'd start things out, by changing one significant thing.

"Congress shall have the power to enact 1 across the boards tax, and only 1" .

I'd also add to the second amendment another sentence at the end:

"This means that the regulation of the arms of anyone not incarcerated is outside the purview of government with no exceptions" .

I'd add a digital bill of rights full of "government shall not" as well.