Send Us Hatemail ! mailbag@conservativecave.com
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Tue Jan 3, 2023, 08:34 PMStar Member PCIntern (23,168 posts)OK...I may have some "news" here....By way of introduction here, one of my patients whom I consider a friend was in my office today and incidentally, he is known nationally as one of the finest criminal defense attorneys in the country. The list of his clients both domestically and internationally….well, I’ll tell you that it made my jaw drop when we met and he mentioned a number of these. He is a political progressive and really really incisive but he is also , of necessity, a realist.So as I was dismissing him from “the chair”, I asked him, “So what do you think of Trump being indicted?”He began by saying that his sources in Atlanta tell him that it’s going to happen: that they’ve assembled what is considered to be an airtight case against Trump.Now it got interesting: he then said that it would be extremely difficult to prove the insurrection case due to interpretations of language BUT he then said that the classified documents case is also solid. He then said that the indictments are coming soon. I didn’t press him as to what “soon” means but it is important to remember that he has dealt with so many federal cases that he’s basically professional buddies with these US Attorneys. He has never blown smoke or BS’d me in all the decades I’ve known him. He rightly predicted that a certain mob trial in Philly would end with acquittal of the defendants even though they had been tried and convicted in the Press, and he was correct as well in a number of trials he participated in wherein the defendant, his client, was found guilty.And, of course, I understand that nobody, but nobody can guarantee any prediction, but I thought I would just pass this along as well-founded information. Oh, and those of you who know me here know that I don’t make this stuff up…
Response to PCIntern (Original post)Tue Jan 3, 2023, 08:36 PMrepublianmushroom (2,833 posts) 1. 23 months and counting
Tue Jan 3, 2023, 08:34 PMStar Member PCIntern (23,168 posts)OK...I may have some "news" here....By way of introduction here, one of my patients whom I consider a friend was in my office today and incidentally, he is known nationally as one of the finest criminal defense attorneys in the country...[snip]
1) Assuming this is true (fat chance) then said US attorneys should not be leaking this information to their buddies.2) If it truly were an "air tight case" then they'd be talking conviction, not mere indictment.
Trumpdumper (148 posts) 27. DubiousI'm certain that the U.S. attorneys working on this case are not talking to anybody. There just is no way they'd spill anything to anyone. The intel detailed above would have had to have come from someone who testified to the grand jury and was convinced by the nature of the questions that the DOJ has got the goods. Fine. But, still, no one outside the prosecution knows whether the federal indictment is coming "soon." Total speculation.
PCIntern (23,171 posts) 30. Common misconceptionBelieve me…there are people who know stuff.I have known a number of high level Dem fundraisers and stuff they’ve told me over the years no one would think would be bandied about. But it is.
This one time, in band camp...PC Janitor is rapidly becoming the new TominTib.
He then said that the indictments are coming soon.
For those of us keeping an eye on the DUmp, how many times have we read this phrase? Doesn't it seem like thousands or more?Most all of the DUmbasses bought this hook, line, and sinker like they always do.
y way of introduction here, one of my patients whom I consider a friend was in my office today and incidentally, he is known nationally as one of the finest criminal defense attorneys in the country.
And then a cop wearing a disposable mask jumped out of the dental supply cabinet...
