The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: formerlurker on December 26, 2012, 06:43:09 PM

Title: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: formerlurker on December 26, 2012, 06:43:09 PM
Quote
Taverner (51,226 posts)

View profile
If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
The term for you is REGRESSIVE

As in, you want the world to be one, bug painball game or laser tag game - only people really die. Whoopee!!!

Now you can have both, but not BUDGING an INCH on gun safety issues shows you for the thug you are.

There is NO ****ING REASON anyone needs semi-auto weapons.

If you feel your rights are threatened by this, then you don't value MY right to live.

IF you don't value my rights, you are a fascist, plain and simple.

So what is it going to be?

Value life?

Or fetishize weapons?
'
We all know the REAL reason you want big guns, and I'm sorry you were born that way.

Money quote:

Quote
Star Member Taverner (51,226 posts)
70. It's because most of these stories are made up

View profile
Who knows? The gun nut might even believe their own lies...

Strange breed, those gun nuts

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022074786
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: AprilRazz on December 26, 2012, 06:48:25 PM
If I am a thug with a small penis than that only makes you a big *****.
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Chris_ on December 26, 2012, 06:50:03 PM
Quote
Taverner (51,226 posts)

If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Show me one ******* liberal that values any life other than their own.  You fakes and phonies love your murderers and abortion doctors and have no room to lecture anyone about "the right to life".
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Mr Mannn on December 26, 2012, 06:50:23 PM
Quote
RTKBA over the right to life

OK. I'm not up on DUmmy grammar/spelling.
1) What is RTKBA?
2) I'm assuming the right to life has nothing to do with pro-life and abortion. What is this referring to?
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: AprilRazz on December 26, 2012, 06:51:25 PM
OK. I'm not up on DUmmy grammar/spelling.
1) What is RTKBA?
2) I'm assuming the right to life has nothing to do with pro-choice and abortion. What is this referring to?
Right To Keep and Bear Arms
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Mr Mannn on December 26, 2012, 06:52:16 PM
Right To Keep and Bear Arms
Thank you. Hi5
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Tucker on December 26, 2012, 06:57:08 PM
Show me one ******* liberal that values any life other than their own.  You fakes and phonies love your murders and abortion doctors and have no room to lecture anyone about "the right to life".

Out of your damn near 35K posts, this one may be the best.

H5
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Texacon on December 26, 2012, 06:59:04 PM
I support RKBA because I support life. You never shoot to kill, you shoot to live. Get it right DUmmie!!

KC
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Freeper on December 26, 2012, 07:48:17 PM
Quote
If you feel your rights are threatened by this, then you don't value MY right to live.

No Tavs I do not value your right to live. If you think your life is threatened by law abiding citizens having scary black guns then the problem is you, not the gun owners. If one is scared that others have guns then that person must have bad intentions.

If one is a fine outstanding citizen then the only time they will see a gun belonging to someone is when they are showing it off or letting you shoot it at the range or wherever.

When someone like Tavs sees a gun it is because he just broke into their house trying to score some dough to buy his smack.

Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on December 26, 2012, 07:53:36 PM
Quote
If you feel your rights are threatened by this, then you don't value MY right to live.

Well, you know, roots of the Tree of Liberty watered with the blood of patriots and all that.  I can deal with it.

 O-)
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Chris_ on December 26, 2012, 07:57:14 PM
He isn't very good at this 'persuasive argument' thing.
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Tucker on December 26, 2012, 07:57:36 PM
Quote
If you feel your rights are threatened by this, then you don't value MY right to live.

If you think that your life is more important than mine, just remember Trayvon Martin and how he ended up.
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Carl on December 26, 2012, 08:03:01 PM
Well druggie...despite how useless you are your right to life is protected by my right to bear arms.
Kind of puts you in a bad place doesn`t it?
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: WinOne4TheGipper on December 26, 2012, 08:26:35 PM
Money quote:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022074786

Holy moley!  Umm, Taverner, you may want to tone down the right to life talk.  You're still on DU, of course.
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Chris_ on December 26, 2012, 08:28:22 PM
Quote
TheMoreYouKnow (63 posts)
2. Anyone who kicks in the front door of someone's home

clearly doesn't value their own right to life and I'm certainly not going to sit down over coffee to discuss with them what their true intentions are.

When did it become progressive to allow other people to take advantage of you and/or harm you?
So many contradictions in one post... the mind boggles.
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: USA4ME on December 26, 2012, 08:54:35 PM
Quote from:
Taverner

...then you don't value MY right to live.

That's true.

.
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Big Dog on December 26, 2012, 09:18:40 PM
"To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms..."
   - Richard Henry Lee, 1788

"Congress has no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American ...the unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people."
   - Tench Coxe, 1788

Molon labe.
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Traveshamockery on December 26, 2012, 09:24:04 PM
I am constantly amazed by the hypocrisy of DUmmies. 

They want the federal government to stay out of their bedrooms and uteri, but expect the same federal government to pay for their birth control and respect their right to kill their unborn babies. 

Yet, law-abiding citizens who want to protect themselves, their families, and their property are somehow evil. 

You can't make this stuff up. 
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: MrsSmith on December 26, 2012, 09:51:04 PM
Just like a DUmmie, can't stand giving infants a  Right to Life, and has no problem removing the right to defend yourself and your family.  Just spit it out, DUmmy, we know that you "tolerant, loving, caring" libs would love to see 90% of the world population wiped out.   :censored:
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Duke Nukum on December 26, 2012, 10:20:32 PM
Quote
If you feel your rights are threatened by this, then you don't value MY right to live.

Says the guy who values nobody's rights.

Hey numbnuts...Oh never mind.
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Airwolf on December 26, 2012, 10:54:10 PM
Your right we don't value anyone that is a waste of skin. You stopped being of value the minute you though that drugs were more important then being productive. Don't believe me then look up whoa happened to druggies and dealers in countries like Turkey and Russia.
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: 98ZJUSMC on December 26, 2012, 11:40:06 PM
Quote
Taverner (51,226 posts)

If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive

*Whew!* Glad that's cleared up.

Quote
the right to life

Watch out, pill popper.  You're starting a war on wymmyns.
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: 98ZJUSMC on December 26, 2012, 11:42:04 PM
Quote
Taverner

...then you don't value MY right to live.

That's true.

Not in the slightest.
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: shoes off the couch on December 27, 2012, 12:17:35 AM
DUmmie Taverner, I believe, is too late to up his standing in this years DOTY award. This rant alone would have propelled him up my ballot by at least a spot or two. DUmmie Taverner's idiocy is not confined by anything, I know. But, the award season is a clearly defined amount of time- one calendar year. Don't hold back so long next year! :popcorn:
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: delilahmused on December 27, 2012, 02:31:39 AM
Quote
There is NO ****ING REASON anyone needs semi-auto weapons.

If you feel your rights are threatened by this, then you don't value MY right to live.

IF you don't value my rights, you are a fascist, plain and simple.

So, someone living hundreds, even thousands of miles away from him, who will never (thank you Jesus!) come in contact with him is not valuing his right to live? How the hell does he twist his mind into that idiocy? And talk about feeling threatened, what a *****! My pissy little Siamese cat is less bitchy. Oh, and keep your laws off my gun cabinet!

Cindie
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: diesel driver on December 27, 2012, 03:02:49 AM

...Oh, and keep your laws off my gun cabinet!

Cindie

OH, THAT'S GOOD!   :cheersmate:

^5   :hi5:  :thumbs:
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Big Dog on December 27, 2012, 05:59:26 AM
Quote
Taverner

...then you don't value MY right to live.

Not in the slightest.

I wouldn't piss on him if he was on fire.
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Zathras on December 27, 2012, 07:56:34 AM
Not in the slightest.


I wouldn't piss on him if he was on fire.

I'd throw gas on him if he was.
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Rebel on December 27, 2012, 08:09:07 AM
Quote
OrwellwasRight (2,612 posts)
75. Interesting you said shotgun.

A shotgun is not a semi automatic weapon, and the OP is about semiautomatic weapons. No one is trying to pry this woman's shotgun out of her hands and your post provides proff that she did not need a semiautomatic weapon to defend herself.

My Remington Model 1100 12 gauge is most definitely a semi-automatic weapon, DUmbass, as is the Saiga that I'll be inheriting.
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: JohnnyReb on December 27, 2012, 08:10:48 AM
Not in the slightest.


I wouldn't piss on him if he was on fire.

I seldom ever drink but I believe that would be an occasion where I'd have to have a few beers before pissing on him................or his smoldering ashes.
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Rebel on December 27, 2012, 08:20:58 AM
BTW, about those "scary black guns", just for S&G's a while back, I bought a Mosin Nagant M38 for 80 bucks. Wood stock, and pretty much original. I modified it. Is this one of those "scary black guns", DUmbasses? Or is it not because it has a bolt? It now has a rail on top with a scope mounted, with the bolt eventually being modified due to location. Maybe the scope makes it "scary"? Inquiring minds and all...


(http://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h228/burnsk73/IMG_0755.jpg)


Before any of you f'tards say, "no, it's not scary"....


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasili_Zaitsev

Quote
Vasily Grigoryevich Zaytsev; 23 March 1915 – 15 December 1991) was a Soviet sniper during World War II, notable particularly for his activities between 10 November and 17 December 1942, during the Battle of Stalingrad. He killed 225 soldiers and officers of the Wehrmacht and other Axis armies, including 11 enemy snipers.

Prior to 10 November, he had already killed 32 Axis soldiers with the standard-issue Mosin–Nagant rifle effective range of 900 meters. Between October 1942 and January 1943, Zaytsev made an estimated 400 kills some of which were over 1000 meters.
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: AprilRazz on December 27, 2012, 08:40:34 AM
"To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms..."
   - Richard Henry Lee, 1788

"Congress has no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American ...the unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people."
   - Tench Coxe, 1788

Molon labe.

Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense?
Patrick Henry
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: AprilRazz on December 27, 2012, 08:42:17 AM
BTW, about those "scary black guns", just for S&G's a while back, I bought a Mosin Nagant M38 for 80 bucks. Wood stock, and pretty much original. I modified it. Is this one of those "scary black guns", DUmbasses? Or is it not because it has a bolt? It now has a rail on top with a scope mounted, with the bolt eventually being modified due to location. Maybe the scope makes it "scary"? Inquiring minds and all...


(http://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h228/burnsk73/IMG_0755.jpg)


Before any of you f'tards say, "no, it's not scary"....


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasili_Zaitsev

That reminds me. I need to send a nice thank you note to Obama and his cronies. I just sold my Mosin carbine for a several times the $40 I paid for it a while back.
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Karin on December 27, 2012, 10:39:30 AM
Quote
If you feel your rights are threatened by this, then you don't value MY right to live.

:lmao:  Tavs, you walked right into that.  What makes you think you're such a special snowflake?  You're a worthless drug addict, and a terrible father and husband. 
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: GOBUCKS on December 27, 2012, 10:43:08 AM
Quote
Prior to 10 November, he had already killed 32 Axis soldiers with the standard-issue Mosin–Nagant rifle effective range of 900 meters. Between October 1942 and January 1943, Zaytsev made an estimated 400 kills some of which were over 1000 meters.

A reminder that American DUmmy Communists and Russian Communists share a common regard for honesty.

Zaytsev made a great movie character, but he was a creation of the Soviet propaganda industry.
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: miskie on December 27, 2012, 10:45:49 AM
Damnit - And I really love playing bug painball too...
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: wasp69 on December 27, 2012, 10:57:29 AM
Quote
Taverner (51,226 posts)

If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive

Well, God be praised!  At least I won't have to go through life worrying about whether or not I would have to escape that label.

Quote
The term for you is REGRESSIVE

I prefer Constitutional Originalist, Conservative Independent, or Paleo-Conservative but whatever you spew out of your hateful, black heart works for me, "hot shot".

Quote
As in, you want the world to be one, bug painball game or laser tag game - only people really die. Whoopee!!!

Touchy little bitch, aren't you?  Maybe you should have your anger issues addressed before you post - misspelling words when you are typing a tantrum makes you look more like a hormonal teenage drama queen than a rational adult making a salient point.

"...bug painball game..."   :lmao:

Quote
Now you can have both, but not BUDGING an INCH on gun safety issues shows you for the thug you are.

Being called a "thug" by a worthless, Oakland junkie is indeed very high praise, DUmmie.   :lmao:

Seriously, Tavs, the "budging" has gone on long enough to where enough of my rights have been eroded by you over emotional bed-wetters.  This is where the line is drawn and where the hard pushback begins.  You get zero "budge" from me on any more "safety issues", especially where it concerns my right to protect my life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness against obinga's "children" and collectivist scum such as yourself.

Learn it, live it, love it, needlefreak. 

Quote
There is NO ****ING REASON anyone needs semi-auto weapons.

I will decide for myself what I "need" and don't "need" without the assistance of the FEDGOV or you, DUmmie.  That's the beauty of being an American, Tavs, individual liberty and freedom.

Quote
If you feel your rights are threatened by this

My rights are threatened daily by your very existence, fascist, and every word you type is verification of that threat.

Quote
then you don't value MY right to live.

Shouted from atop a mountain of the murdered unborn...

You don't value your own "right to live", junkie, so why should I?

Quote
IF you don't value my rights, you are a fascist, plain and simple.

What "rights"?  You surrendered your "rights" the very second you decided the government needed to be your caretaker and provider.  You don't have any "rights", slave.

Quote
So what is it going to be?

Value life?

Or fetishize weapons?

Or what, smackhead?  An ultimatum from an ignorant, impotent child?  Is this supposed to scare me?

 :lmao:

A law abiding, civilized citizen does not "fetishize" anything, simpleton.  A civilized adult views firearms as tools, not a personality extension.  An educated, disciplined citizen understands the dangers of firearms and handles them accordingly.  An ignorant, childish, petulant fool is not only a detriment to civilized society but also need not ever own a firearm - especially if they don't understand the difference between a "firearm" and a general "weapon".  Anything can be turned into a "weapon", DUmmie, and I don't think you are quite ready to have most everything in your hovel declared illegal to ensure you can't hurt yourself.

Quote
We all know the REAL reason you want big guns, and I'm sorry you were born that way.

Again, your retard ignorance shines through.  "Big guns" are not easily concealed and are really not my personal preference.  I personally carry sub compacts concealed and a "normal sized" on the hip.  My sub compacts range from .22, to 4.10, to .45 Long Colt, to .45 ACP, to .357 Magnum, to .380.  If someone is a big enough asshole to try and deprive me of my life or property, they get to find out what configuration I decided on that morning when I left the house.  Remember what I said about civilized people, firearms, and tools?  Tavs, you need not worry about the tool, be more cautious of the hand that wields it.

The majority of rifles i own would not be touched by any knee jerk legislation from you infantile pukes and the ones I own that scare you would be grandfathered.  Any capital expended by your leper messiah and his party would be meaningless.

Finally, if you are somehow or another intimating that because I own "scary black guns" that I have a small dick, well, I can dig up a few references that would tell you differently.  Conversely, if you are suggesting that because you don't own a firearm that you possess a big dick, then I suggest you spit it out and give it back to the man you took it from.
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: NHSparky on December 27, 2012, 11:11:45 AM
Oh, Tav.  You're so cute when you beat your hollow little chest and pretend you matter.
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: JohnnyReb on December 27, 2012, 12:26:45 PM
RTKBA: right to kick blubbering asses
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Rebel on December 27, 2012, 12:36:12 PM
Keep talking, you wannabe authoritarian Progs. We're listening.

http://www.aimsurplus.com


Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Karin on December 27, 2012, 01:31:43 PM
Anybody going to the tailgate party before the bug painball game?  I'll bring wings. 
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Airwolf on December 27, 2012, 03:15:33 PM
Well, God be praised!  At least I won't have to go through life worrying about whether or not I would have to escape that label.

I prefer Constitutional Originalist, Conservative Independent, or Paleo-Conservative but whatever you spew out of your hateful, black heart works for me, "hot shot".

Touchy little bitch, aren't you?  Maybe you should have your anger issues addressed before you post - misspelling words when you are typing a tantrum makes you look more like a hormonal teenage drama queen than a rational adult making a salient point.

"...bug painball game..."   :lmao:

Being called a "thug" by a worthless, Oakland junkie is indeed very high praise, DUmmie.   :lmao:

Seriously, Tavs, the "budging" has gone on long enough to where enough of my rights have been eroded by you over emotional bed-wetters.  This is where the line is drawn and where the hard pushback begins.  You get zero "budge" from me on any more "safety issues", especially where it concerns my right to protect my life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness against obinga's "children" and collectivist scum such as yourself.

Learn it, live it, love it, needlefreak. 

I will decide for myself what I "need" and don't "need" without the assistance of the FEDGOV or you, DUmmie.  That's the beauty of being an American, Tavs, individual liberty and freedom.

My rights are threatened daily by your very existence, fascist, and every word you type is verification of that threat.

Shouted from atop a mountain of the murdered unborn...

You don't value your own "right to live", junkie, so why should I?

What "rights"?  You surrendered your "rights" the very second you decided the government needed to be your caretaker and provider.  You don't have any "rights", slave.

Or what, smackhead?  An ultimatum from an ignorant, impotent child?  Is this supposed to scare me?

 :lmao:

A law abiding, civilized citizen does not "fetishize" anything, simpleton.  A civilized adult views firearms as tools, not a personality extension.  An educated, disciplined citizen understands the dangers of firearms and handles them accordingly.  An ignorant, childish, petulant fool is not only a detriment to civilized society but also need not ever own a firearm - especially if they don't understand the difference between a "firearm" and a general "weapon".  Anything can be turned into a "weapon", DUmmie, and I don't think you are quite ready to have most everything in your hovel declared illegal to ensure you can't hurt yourself.

Again, your retard ignorance shines through.  "Big guns" are not easily concealed and are really not my personal preference.  I personally carry sub compacts concealed and a "normal sized" on the hip.  My sub compacts range from .22, to 4.10, to .45 Long Colt, to .45 ACP, to .357 Magnum, to .380.  If someone is a big enough asshole to try and deprive me of my life or property, they get to find out what configuration I decided on that morning when I left the house.  Remember what I said about civilized people, firearms, and tools?  Tavs, you need not worry about the tool, be more cautious of the hand that wields it.

The majority of rifles i own would not be touched by any knee jerk legislation from you infantile pukes and the ones I own that scare you would be grandfathered.  Any capital expended by your leper messiah and his party would be meaningless.

Finally, if you are somehow or another intimating that because I own "scary black guns" that I have a small dick, well, I can dig up a few references that would tell you differently.  Conversely, if you are suggesting that because you don't own a firearm that you possess a big dick, then I suggest you spit it out and give it back to the man you took it from.

Not if Di Fi gets her way your guns won't be "Grandfathered in

http://militaryarms.blogspot.com/2012/12/the-awb-of-2013.html
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Tucker on December 27, 2012, 03:20:27 PM
A reminder that American DUmmy Communists and Russian Communists share a common regard for honesty.

Zaytsev made a great movie character, but he was a creation of the Soviet propaganda industry.

Hell, there were women who had over 500 confirmed kills. But then they were in a target rich environment.
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: DefiantSix on December 27, 2012, 03:27:08 PM
Quote
If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive

Thank God that my sanity has been been confirmed so definitively. :foff:
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: JohnnyReb on December 27, 2012, 03:37:54 PM
My weapons will have to be dead grandmothered in.
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on December 27, 2012, 05:20:54 PM
Oh, Tav.  You're so cute when you beat your hollow little chest and pretend you matter.

Drugs are about a hundred times more likely to bring about his translation to the next plane of existence than firearms are anyway, he should just unbunch his panties, rummage around in his stash, and gobble down 12 or 14 random capsules, washing them down with several bargain-basement-brand alcohol drinks, and get it over with.
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: LC EFA on December 27, 2012, 05:51:07 PM
Tav ole buddy ole pal.

How is your right to life in any way effected by the right of anyone else to bear arms ?

Unless of course you decide to infringe upon one of more of their other rights , and get your druggie thug ass perforated for it.
 
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: BlueStateSaint on December 27, 2012, 06:56:46 PM
Tav ole buddy ole pal.

How is your right to life in any way effected by the right of anyone else to bear arms ?

Unless of course you decide to infringe upon one of more of their other rights , and get your druggie thug ass perforated for it.
 

I think you're onto something there, LC.
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Big Dog on December 27, 2012, 07:27:05 PM
DUmbass Tavernwhore doesn't understand that the Right to Keep and Bear Arms is the Right to Life.

Let me spell it out for you, DUmbass:

The Right to Life is the only natural right which is irreplaceable when taken away. In other words, every other right, natural or civil, may be restored by physical or legal means, with the exception of the Right to Life.

The right of a Free Man to keep and bear arms is the cornerstone of the Right to Life. His protection of his life, the lives of his family, his property, his community, his state, and his nation make up the layers of bedrock that constitute his duty as a Man and a Citizen.

MOLON LABE.
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Airwolf on December 27, 2012, 07:58:30 PM
You can bet those store owners in L.A. were happy to have the right to have guns. I guess Tavernturd would like to explain to them why they shouldn't have them or maybe he should tell it to gays and other minorities why his rights are more important. maybe he would tell those in New Orleans why they shouldn't have guns after Katrina struck and looting was the latest past time by thugs of all kinds.

[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tgCiC6qTtjs[/youtube]



Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Tucker on December 27, 2012, 08:16:54 PM
You can bet those store owners in L.A. were happy to have the right to have guns.





It's different though. Those people were little ____________ people

Choose one:  brown, black, yellow, red
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Airwolf on December 27, 2012, 08:24:25 PM
It is a basic human right to have the ability to defend oneself against any that wish to do harm. Don't believe me ask any gay man or woman how they feel if they couldn't defend themselves or any Black or Latino or Asian. Especially an Asian man that had to defend himself and his property during the riots after the Rodney King verdict and it took the threat of sending in the military to calm things down. You can bet those Asian store owners were glad there is a 2nd Amendment to the Constitution.

Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Tucker on December 27, 2012, 08:57:07 PM
My point being is that to a DUmmy, whites have no right to self defense as they have raped, pillaged and plundered minorities for thousands of years. It's karma.
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Karin on December 28, 2012, 07:41:38 AM
I would think that Taverner would like guns, and have one.  His hobby puts him in the vicinity of dangerous people in order to do transactions.  He lives in Oakland to pursue this particular hobby.  I have a vague sense of foreboding...
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: BlueStateSaint on December 28, 2012, 08:48:04 AM
You can bet those store owners in L.A. were happy to have the right to have guns. I guess Tavernturd would like to explain to them why they shouldn't have them or maybe he should tell it to gays and other minorities why his rights are more important. maybe he would tell those in New Orleans why they shouldn't have guns after Katrina struck and looting was the latest past time by thugs of all kinds.

[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tgCiC6qTtjs[/youtube]





This is something about that . . .

http://www.conservativecave.com/index.php/topic,82065.0.html
Title: Re: If you support the RTKBA over the right to life - you are not a progressive
Post by: Rebel on December 28, 2012, 08:53:41 AM
You can bet those store owners in L.A. were happy to have the right to have guns. I guess Tavernturd would like to explain to them why they shouldn't have them or maybe he should tell it to gays and other minorities why his rights are more important. maybe he would tell those in New Orleans why they shouldn't have guns after Katrina struck and looting was the latest past time by thugs of all kinds.

[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tgCiC6qTtjs[/youtube]






Animals.