I can't do it, guys.
There are a lot of reasons to nail DUmmies, but typos or, worse, auto-spell check replacements. All of us do it -- even those all agree are erudite.
Let us judge them on the content of their character and not on the fat on their fingers:
nadinisms due to typos or autocomplete? Au cntrainere!! You welcome!
That smacks of a DUmp noob. Not a single enduring nadinism is an accidental error by someone who knows better.
Every one is a screwup by someone to professes to know everything, but actually almost nothing at all, and who absolutely refuses to admit an error.
The example upthread here is just silly and stupid to point out, and in no way represents the DUmp ignorance we normally highlight. Most of the great minds here would struggle with "brazen". (Needing to use the dictionary to define "braise" is evidence enough of that.)
No need for a kerfunkle, or even fist to cuffs.
Present example excepted, you'll have to search pretty hard to find another place where anything but obvious ignorance has been ridiculed. Ninety-five percent of the time it will be a piece of mangled prose from the award-wining journo.