No you didn't...but it seemed to be implied when you said this:Ok lets say it doesn't take two incomes to sustain a mortgage,what happens when the person making the mortgage payment loses his or her job. Making a purchase the size of a house involves risk no matter what your income. Things happen to people bkg! Things that are out of their control at times. Illness,job loss,divorce,death.....life is risk. You cannot plan for everything. I stand by what i said earlier...I pray to God you never have to eat your words brother....they are awfully bitter going down.
Dude - I'm single. I have one income and have already acknowledged the risk. If you have two incomes, why not buy a house that ONE of those incomes qualifies for rather than both? That way, if one loses their job, the second income will have provided a) opportunity to build a rainy day fund and/or b) a greater chance of having a sustainable ability to make the mortgage.
I don't understand why you're so defensive. I don't care how you purchased or why - it's none of my business. At the same time I ask you this: what is a more bitter pill to swallow? Me eating my words or you losing your house if one spouse loses a job and the other spouse cannot sustain house payments?
Do you really think it's a financially better decision to buy a house on both incomes than one? If so, please explain.