OK, could someone explain to me how this ruling puts any government worker out of a job? Even if DU-Moron
angrychair is employed by the union rather than the state, are there no union members in that state's government?
The only way I can see his/her employment status affected is if
angrychair is employed by the union, but no or almost no state workers are union members. That's rather improbable, so I'm calling
on this
.