The Conservative Cave
Current Events => Terrorism In the US and Around the World => Topic started by: CG6468 on April 26, 2013, 07:29:12 PM
-
A man who calls a spade a spade.
[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9sYgqRtZGg[/youtube]
-
This guy comes on a local radio show about once a month. He was on yesterday... I was reading his website earlier.
http://www.politicalislam.com/
-
He has some other videos on YouTube.
-
A man who calls a spade a spade.
[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9sYgqRtZGg[/youtube]
I love this! Soooo true!
The jihadist brothers were “niceâ€, because deception is the heart of Islam’s dualistic ethics. The shortest hadith is only 3 words: “war is deceit,†says Mohammed. When Mohammed sent out an assassin against a Jewish poet, he said for the assassin to use deceit to get close to the Jew in order to kill him. Mohammed advised deceit if it advanced Islam for there is no Golden Rule in Islam.
But the main reason that the Tsarnaevs were “nice†is that they only started to truly embrace Islam in the past two years. Tamerlan began to pray 5 times a day and become more religious. Before the immersion in Islam, they could actually be a friend to a Kafir. The Koran has 12 verses that say the Muslim can be friendly with a Kafir, but he is never truly their friend. A Muslim is a brother only to another Muslim, never a Kafir. So after becoming religious, they were no longer the true friend of any Kafir.
Bottom line: the measure of a Muslim is not whether they are “nice†but how closely they follow the doctrine of Islam. The media will be filled for the next few weeks about how nice most Muslims are. Remember that every Muslim is bound by the entire Islamic doctrine. A good Muslim must accept all of the Koran, Sunna or Sharia, which includes jihad. All Muslims must believe in jihad if they believe in Islam. They may choose not to follow it, but jihad is always there.
-
Firekraka had a quote excerpt in his post...
The shortest hadith is only 3 words: “war is deceit,†says Mohammed. When Mohammed sent out an assassin against a Jewish poet, he said for the assassin to use deceit to get close to the Jew in order to kill him. Mohammed advised deceit if it advanced Islam for there is no Golden Rule in Islam.
The Nazis almost perfected propaganda, but whatever perfecting that was still needed has been co opted by people who were very cozy with the Nazis...
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/01/11/leaked-emails-show-al-jazeera-editor-has-a-very-different-take-on-the-charlie-hebdo-massacre/ (http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/01/11/leaked-emails-show-al-jazeera-editor-has-a-very-different-take-on-the-charlie-hebdo-massacre/)
When al jazeera flaks for muzzies they show themselves to be even less objective than the owebumaManiaMedia, if that's even possible.
-
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Numbers+31%3A17-18&version=KJV
17 Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him.
18 But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.
Numbers 31:17-18 KJV Bible
-
Here we go again with the defense of the Islamo-Nazis.
-
Here we go again with the defense of the Islamo-Nazis.
I'm not defending them, they are murderous monsters who should be promptly killed. I am saying be consistent with condemnation.
-
Yes...you are defending them. When Christians are conducting all of the terrorism in the world in the same manner the Islamo-Nazis are...you'll have a valid point with your attempts at moral relevance. But as it stands it's not Christians beheading...kidnapping...burning people alive and selling women into slavery. It's radical Islam.
And your pathetic attempt to equivocate what's happening today with some obscure passage from the Old Testament is telling on where your sympathies on a lot of things really is.
Progressives LOVE to pull up OT passages to bash Christians.
You're no different.
-
Yes...you are defending them. When Christians are conducting all of the terrorism in the world in the same manner the Islamo-Nazis are...you'll have a valid point with your attempts at moral relevance. But as it stands it's not Christians beheading...kidnapping...burning people alive and selling women into slavery. It's radical Islam.
And your pathetic attempt to equivocate what's happening today with some obscure passage from the Old Testament is telling on where your sympathies on a lot of things really is.
Progressives LOVE to pull up OT passages to bash Christians.
You're no different.
The icing on the cake is that he claims to have never voted for owebuma...yeah, right.
-
The icing on the cake is that he claims to have never voted for owebuma...yeah, right.
Maybe he did...maybe he didn't. Doesn't matter either way....by his own words on here...quoted so as not to be taken out of context on nuumerous posts...he's proven he's neither a Christian or a Conservative.
-
Maybe he did...maybe he didn't. Doesn't matter either way....by his own words on here...quoted so as not to be taken out of context on nuumerous posts...he's proven he's neither a Christian or a Conservative.
I see your point, and it's ironclad.
-
(http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/index_files/TROP.jpg)
How many acts of "christian" terrorists have there been? I'm guessing slightly less. And by slightly less, I mean near zero.
-
(http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/index_files/TROP.jpg)
How many acts of "christian" terrorists have there been? I'm guessing slightly less. And by slightly less, I mean near zero.
A bakery refused to bake a wedding cake once. It all balances out- to the proglodytes.
-
A bakery refused to bake a wedding cake once. It all balances out- to the proglodytes.
Post of the day.
Which reminds me.
I have been mulling a thread that chronicles all of the awardees of my coveted "post of the day" award.
It could include post of the month, week and year from amongst the post of the day winners.
Then, the post of the year could be awarded during DOTY awards week, showing the DUmmies the gold standard of what they should be striving for.
Any feedback ?