According to sources close to the administration, Gen McChrystal shocked and angered presidential advisers with the bluntness of a speech given in London last week.
The next day he was summoned to an awkward 25-minute face-to-face meeting on board Air Force One on the tarmac in Copenhagen, where the president had arrived to tout Chicago's unsuccessful Olympic bid.
Asked if the president had told the general to tone down his remarks, he told CBS: "I wasn't there so I can't answer that question. But it was an opportunity for them to get to know each other a little bit better. I am sure they exchanged direct views."
An adviser to the administration said: "People aren't sure whether McChrystal is being naïve or an upstart. To my mind he doesn't seem ready for this Washington hard-ball and is just speaking his mind too plainly."
In London, Gen McChrystal, who heads the 68,000 US troops in Afghanistan as well as the 100,000 Nato forces, flatly rejected proposals to switch to a strategy more reliant on drone missile strikes and special forces operations against al-Qaeda.
He told the Institute of International and Strategic Studies that the formula, which is favoured by Vice-President Joe Biden, would lead to "Chaos-istan".
When asked whether he would support it, he said: "The short answer is: No."
He went on to say: "Waiting does not prolong a favorable outcome. This effort will not remain winnable indefinitely, and nor will public support."
The remarks have been seen by some in the Obama administration as a barbed reference to the slow pace of debate within the White House.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/6259582/Barack-Obama-furious-at-General-Stanley-McChrystal-speech-on-Afghanistan.htmlFirst of all, that the WH can rejected a SpecOps general who has the professionalism and ofresight to say this cannot be won exclusively by SpecOps demonstrates a level of professionalism that trumps one's own specialty. Obviously the general is not motivated by territorial pissings--a thing that contribute greatly to the Desert One debacle under Carter.
Second, Joe Biden is a ****ing moron and how anyone could give his plan more credence over a seasoned SpecOps warrior beggars the imagination. Methinks Obama is looking for an easy out and Biden is the fall guy.
Third, AMERICANS ARE DYING WHILE THIS EGOTISTICAL SHITBAG IS WORRIED ABOUT HIS PUBLIC IMAGE. He'll spend untold amounts of "political capital" so he can have Olympic games greet him as he returns home for his last year in office but he can't manage to meet with his theatre commander except to bitch about how his public image is damaged...nevermind trying to win a war he himself campaigned for.
If Obama throws/loses this war the same calls for impeachment that were threatened against Bush when he wanted to go with the surge in Iraq should be brought to bear against Obama and Biden's dumbass can twist right along with it.