The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: dutch508 on January 09, 2019, 07:40:15 PM
-
LongtimeAZDem (1,073 posts)
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100211649664
Pelosi and Schumer need to insist on the presence of reporters in all further meetings
If the GOP is going to try a misinformation tactic, we need to shine a light on the process.
Why it was just a little bit ago it was Chuck and Nancy who didn't want the press to be in on the conversation with the Trump...
guillaumeb (29,632 posts)
1. Recommended.
Insist that the meeting be televised as well.
Oh, yes... I want them on record... :whistling:
-
LongtimeAZDem (1,073 posts)
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100211649664
Pelosi and Schumer need to insist on the presence of reporters in all further meetings
sort of like supervised parental visits...
-
Weren't DUpipo saying the exact opposite several weeks ago concerning that meeting in the WH?
-
Weren't DUpipo saying the exact opposite several weeks ago concerning that meeting in the WH?
Yeah, but that was SO last week. The new memo came out and they're all on board.
KC
-
DUpipo have all but copyrighted talking about an unspecified something, assuming everyone know what that something is. In this case, Chuckles' first account of what happened had Trump asking his simple question, Miss Nancy said "No" and Trump said goodbye. A later version added the embellishment that Trump slammed the table before walking out. Trump denied the embellished version.
Given that Trump would have expected Miss Nancy's response - which is why he asked the question so directly - I believe Chuckles' first account.
-
Obama warns Cantor: ‘Don’t call my bluff’ (https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/171403-obama-warns-cantor-dont-call-my-bluff-in-debt-talks)
What are the odds DUpipo cheered this Obamian tantrum?
-
DUpipo have all but copyrighted talking about an unspecified something, assuming everyone know what that something is. In this case, Chuckles' first account of what happened had Trump asking his simple question, Miss Nancy said "No" and Trump said goodbye. A later version added the embellishment that Trump slammed the table before walking out. Trump denied the embellished version.
Given that Trump would have expected Miss Nancy's response - which is why he asked the question so directly - I believe Chuckles' first account.
I would be very pleased if it was actually "Trump slammed Chuck and Nan's heads on the table before walking out".
-
I would be very pleased if it was actually "Trump slammed Chuck and Nan's heads on the table before walking out".
Or heads together like coconuts, three-stooges style. :yahoo:
-
Or heads together like coconuts, three-stooges style. :yahoo:
You couldn't wield a club, pipe, or 2X4 large enough to knock any sense into those 2 heads...
-
You couldn't wield a club, pipe, or 2X4 large enough to knock any sense into those 2 heads...
:-) Would the Secret Service be upset if I asked you to prove that? :-)
-
:-) Would the Secret Service be upset if I asked you to prove that? :-)
No, because they are not Secret Service protectees. Their personal security is provided by the Capitol Police.
-
No, because they are not Secret Service protectees. Their personal security is provided by the Capitol Police.
Would they be upset? Or relieved ...
-
Obama warns Cantor: ‘Don’t call my bluff’ (https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/171403-obama-warns-cantor-dont-call-my-bluff-in-debt-talks)
What are the odds DUpipo cheered this Obamian tantrum?
Don't call my bluff. I'd forgotten about that one. Who says that? I'm bluffing, but it'd be a big mistake to call me on it. What a simpleton.